Preview

Validity Of Animal Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
217 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Validity Of Animal Testing
Animal testing once again fails when it comes to the reliability of their results. Most people might think that animal tests are somehow certain. Perhaps if these tests were not that certain then labs would not perform them right? Well, that is exactly the problem. These experiments preformed on innocent animals might not have the same effect on human beings. A mouse it is not even close to having the same genes as a person, to begin with. As Leist and Hartung report, the results taken from an analysis which compared the genes of a mouse to 5,000 human beings’ genes, were extremely “shocking”. The results were tremendously deficient. In fact, in the areas where most animals’ are tested, the resemblance between men-mouse is almost inexistent
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experiments
    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experiments

    Therefore most of these animal tests are inaccurate. Diseases that may develop in humans are genetically engineered differently than any other animal. This relates back to the unethical side, as millions of animals are being tortuously killed just to be disposed of. Animal tests have no way of predicting the outcomes or results on a human, medical treatment is very specific to the individual being treated. Prescribed medicines are unique and are tweaked to work for that human specifically, testing on a whole new species does not effectively correspond to the human body.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ama Jane Goodall Analysis
    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ama Jane Goodall Analysis

    One argument the AMA makes is, “humans cannot be substituted for animals in studies where an inbred strain is essential” (681). This is an undeniable truth. It is a fact that this research cannot be done with humans, since it is not possible for humans to be bred like that. Another point the AMA makes is that, “the issue is not what has not been accomplished by animal use in biomedical research, but what has been accomplished” (682). This refutation invalidates the opposition, and reminds the audience of the other side of animal use in research, which is purely beneficial for the human race.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sunrise Over Fallujah Analysis
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sunrise Over Fallujah Analysis

    he word death is the action or fact of dying or being killed. The end of life a person or organism.Death is an emotional rollercoaster that causes great pain to your loved ones and friends. Death is portrayed all through the book ‘Sunrise over Fallujah’ by Dean Walters. In sunrise over Fallujah there's a civil affairs unit in iraq seeing death everyday in large amounts. Seeing the death of innocent people and doing the killing themselves is causing the unit mental state to be compromised with. The unit have seen multiple kids being killed. Seeing the kids being killed played a larger effect on things more than seeing adults being killed. Although they’re from different parts of the world they still have the same emotions as they do.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    Animal testing for scientific or commercial use is wrong and inaccurate because animals are made up differently than humans. Animal testing is procedures done on animals for research to test medicine and commercial items to see if they are harmful or effective for humans. The experiments can cause the animals to have physical and mental suffering and distress. Most of the animals are killed at the end of the experimentation but some are used again in other experiments. The most common animals used for the experiments are fish, mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, farm animals, hamsters, birds, cats, dogs, and monkeys. More than 115 million animals are used in experiments worldwide. Animals are living beings too, they should get the chance to live…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Inaccurate
    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal Testing Inaccurate

    Most animal testing is very inaccurate because human beings have different chemistry than animals, some animals are similar to humans but they have gaps that can prevent or make false cures that can do more harm than help that is why animals are given medicine that people are not prescribed. “U.S. Food and Drug Administration found that 92 percent of drugs entering clinical trials following animal testing fail to be approved. Of those approved, half are withdrawn…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Argumentative Essay
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

    When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether it helps researchers to find new drugs and treatments suitable for humans. Whereas some are convinced that it does help researchers find new drugs and treatments, others maintain that some drugs tested on animals may never actually be useful or even safe for human consumption. In my own view the results of animals testing are unreliable because animals and humans are not genetically or anatomically alike to one another.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Is Bad Science
    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Testing Is Bad Science

    In addition with no enforced laws, animals produce different results than humans. For instance, lead in w/transition “Even within the same species, similar disparities can be found among different sexes, breeds, age and weight ranges, and ethnic backgrounds” (“Results from Research…” n.pag.) The research people are doing will have an unlikely result in succeeding and or curing because they do not consider different characteristics of animals. Even with animals of the same species, there is no guarantee that all outcomes will be the same. Examine results show, “Animal studies are flawed by design. In addition to the fact that animals make poor surrogates for humans, the design of animal experiments is often inherently flawed, making it that much more unlikely that results obtained from such studies will be useful” (“Results from Research…”n.pag) The experiments we use on animals have no impact on human lives because even though animals have a similar body structure, they do not always correspond with the human anatomy. Scientists should put in more consideration with size, shape, skin, and different ways breeds function.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Flaws
    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing Flaws

    Animal testing has always been a dispute between people; some people think it’s morally wrong and some people think it helps with medical and scientific breakthroughs. Drugs that people use or cosmetics that are used could have been tested through animals before being stocked on shelves. About 800 animals are tested on before a drug is passed to clinical trials (“Is animal”). Many animals get tested on, but many like mice, rabbits, hamsters, monkeys, dogs, cats, pigs, and some other animals get tested on. Animals can be used to find new advances in medical treatment and check safety for products, but these animals that get tested on can go through pain and death. Animal testing is wrong and should be stopped because…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    animal testing
    • 1183 Words
    • 4 Pages

    animal testing

    Animal testing has contributed too many life-saving cures and treatments. “California Biomedical Research Association starts that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals” (ProCon). Animal testing has helped save many lives today and come up with new cures for medical purposes. Because of animal testing we were able to find a new molecular and genetic understanding of tumor biology which led us to treatment that directly kills cancer cells. “This year, approximately 182,800 women in the United states will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer” (AMP). Alec Baldwin, who has broken with the PETA over the value of animal research in developing treatments for breast cancer told the USA that one cannot be ‘single issue’ when it comes to medical reassure. Animal testing was the reason for the development of Herceptin and tamoxifen. Which are two medicines that have saved many men and women’s lives today. It helps us prevent and give us hope to find a way to cure. Studies with animals determined with folic acid, a B vitamin, helps prevent serious birth defects of the spinal cord and the brain when taken before conception and early in pregnancy. Also, “research involving animal models continues to improve treatment’s for chronic complications including blindness, kidney disease,…

    • 1183 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing and its harmful effects
    • 1997 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animal Testing and its harmful effects

    What product features grab the attention of the customer who strolls down the cosmetic aisle of the store? Is it the discovery of which perfume smells appealing or which brand of shampoo is the cheapest? Or does the consumer consider whether animals suffered during testing to ensure that the purchased shampoo or perfume was safe for human use? My guess is probably not. Little does our society recognize that many drugs, cosmetic items, and household chemicals have been rigorously tested on animals before ever lining the shelves of local department and grocery stores and in this process animals have been harmed or sacrificed.…

    • 1997 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing In Today's Society
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing In Today's Society

    It is argued that testing products on animals is cruel and inhumane. Animals go through procedures without anesthetic and are normally killed by breaking their necks or decapitating them. Animals are force fed, forced to inhale chemicals, exhausted from physical restraint, and sometimes starved of food and water. Researchers burn them and create boils, cuts, and other wounds, only to observe the healing process. People that agree with the methods of animal testing argue that animal’s lives are irrelevant compared to a human’s life and that they have a similar anatomy of a human being. It may be that chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans, and mice are 98% genetically similar to humans but as “Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University, says, "it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human." Thomas Hartung, Professor of evidence-based toxicology at Johns Hopkins University, argues for alternatives to animal testing because "we are not 70 kg rats." (ProCon, Screen 1) Scientists believe that animals make better testing subjects due to their short life spans, which makes sense, but animal tests do not reliably predict results in…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay Benefits Of Animal Testing
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay Benefits Of Animal Testing

    In today’s society, many people debate whether or not using animals in research is humane. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. [2] Proponents of animal testing state that it has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, while opponents state that animal testing is cruel and often yields irrelevant results because animals are so different from human beings. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it provides opportunities to improve the lives of both humans and animals.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Animal Testing Beneficial
    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is Animal Testing Beneficial

    Have you ever wondered what animal testing has helped us accomplished? Also, what it has done to our lives? I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it allows us to test medications before they are given to people and has helped us uncover other important things.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing

    Is it wrong to experiment on animals for our own benefit? Many may disagree and believe its immoral and shouldnt be done. Science and manufacturing need animal experimentation to prevent harm to humans because it helps to develope cures for disease and to save humans from experimentation.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Abolish Animal Testing Research Paper
    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Abolish Animal Testing Research Paper

    One could also say that the close genetic similarity shared between testing animals and humans also attributes to altogether accurate results (“Animal”). On the contrary, this testing is not always reliable, and the impacts can be devastating. In the 1950s, a sleeping pill was released, claiming to be safe for pregnant women (“Science”). The result was 10,000 infants born with limb deformities. The end results of the pill were completely contradictory to the results of the animal tests. The formula was tested on pregnant mice, rats, cats, and hamsters, and still proved to be safe. Similarly, Vioxx, an arthritis medication, was tested on mice, and proved to protect the animal’s heart, as it should. But, the pill caused 27,000 heart related deaths, and heart attacks (“Animal”). This further illustrates that the difference in genetics between humans and animals makes animal testing not as reliable as some may…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics