Preview

Victorian Civil And Administrative Tribunal Case Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Victorian Civil And Administrative Tribunal Case Study
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal or VCAT is established under the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 and began operation on 1 July 1998, amalgamating 15 boards and tribunals to offer a “one-stop shop” dealing with a range of disputes.
Their vision is to serve the community by resolving disputes in a timely, cost effective and efficient way.
Hearing are conducted at 55 King Street, Melbourne, as well at a range of venues in suburban and regional Victoria.
Victorian Civil and Administrative is a conference or a forum primarily for individuals, foundations, company that may not be personified in court by a lawyer but nonetheless has rights to appear and conduct proceedings in court on behalf of their client. VCAT
…show more content…
The prosecution that I’ve listed to was about the Coles Group Development. Coles Group Property Developments Ltd. develop, owns, and leases commercial sites and shopping centers. The company was in earlier times known as Coles Myer Property Developments Ltd. Coles Group Property Developments Ltd. was integrated in 1959 and is based in Glen Iris, Australia. Coles Group Property Developments Ltd. runs as a subsidiary of Wesfarmers Limited.
Against the City Council of Boroonda a local government area in Victoria, Australia. It is located in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne.
The Trial is all about the permit to build this establishment manage by The Coles Group Property Development Ltd. The City Council of Boroonda rejected the permit and not allowing them to build their supermarket, because it will affects 78 owners or occupiers of nearby land who may be materially affected by the proposed development. The permit applicant complied with this direction.
One of the reason why the City of Council declined the permit application for the land is because of the short notice and people living nearby the land is not
…show more content…
• Lack of Publicity.
• Lack of Planning and Environmental List.
• Extend of Notice about amendments land.
• Number of Community Objector
• 1,200 objectors have point out that they do not intend to participate at the hearing but wish their Statement of Grounds to be considered.
Law Related Observe Case
Consent of Parties: Law of Mistake
Broadly speaking, it has to be identified whether what type of Mistake was exertive and that according to Davenport, B. and Parker, D. (2012) it is necessary to determine whether the particular mistake is amply serious. It is seemingly obvious that the defendant made a unilateral mistake in the process of agreement.
In a one sided contract, one party known as the offeror, makes a promise in exchange for an act by another party known as the offeree. If the offeree acts on the offeror’s promise, the offeror is legally obligated to fulfil the contract. After an offeree has performed, only one enforceable promise exists, that of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful