Preview

Victorian Court Hierarchy Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
753 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Victorian Court Hierarchy Essay
Question One: The existence of the court hierarchy means that there are courts that are superior to other courts. One reason for this is if you are unhappy with a decision from a particular court you can appeal your case to a higher court. Another reason for the existence of the court hierarchy is the doctrine of precedent. This allows courts higher in the hierarchy to create a precedent that all lower courts must follow, making sure all cases are heard in a similar manner. Another reason for the existence of the court hierarchy is specialisation. This means the courts are able to specialise in their particular area of law.
Question Two: The Magistrates’ Court is the lowest court in the Victorian Court hierarchy. It has the ability to hear up to $100,000 for all civil disputes including personal injury. All disputes that are under $10,000 go to arbitration. In its criminal division, the Magistrates’ Court can hear summary offences such as minor assault and careless driving, indictable offences heard summarily, committal proceedings, bail applications and warrant issues. The Magistrates Court has no appellate jurisdiction.
Question Three: If this case were
…show more content…

The decision made by the arbitrator is legally enforceable (binding). Private arbitrators may be asked to arbitrate on matters that were not able to be resolved through negotiation or mediation. Mediation is a joint problem-solving process in which the parties in conflict sit down and discuss the issue involved, develop options, consider alternatives and reach an agreement through negotiation. The mediator does not interfere, but keeps the lines of communication open. Although a decision reached during the mediation process is not binding on the parties, parties tend to be more committed to a decision reached in this way and are more likely to uphold

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The arbitrator decides the rules, weighs the facts and arguments of both parties, and then decides the dispute. Arbitration may be voluntary or mandatory. ( naca.net)…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The role of the courts: Courts have certain jurisdiction over certain areas of the law. There are several levels of court in NSW which are set out in hierarchical order. The NSW Courts are as…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arbitration is a relatively fast way to arrive upon a decision when two parties are in a dispute. Arbitration has definite benefits such as being flexible and not as formal as a traditional courthouse. Usually, arbitration can be scheduled quicker and with less working parts than a trial. In rare instances, if all parties involved come to an agreement, arbitrators can sometimes create rulings that judges are not allowed to decide. In arbitration, both sides present all evidence to an arbitrator in efforts to prove each side’s case. The arbitrator reaches a final verdict and decides whom the winners and losers are. An arbitrator does the job that a traditional judge or jury would normally do in court if the matter escalated to that point (Hill…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgt441 Assignment 4

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Third-party involvement includes mediation, fact-finding, and arbitration”(Fossum, 2015, p.409). Mediation is a party that assists the involved party however remains neutral. Mediation will find a common ground where the parties involved can communicate together in order to find a solution to whatever problem or task is at hand. However easy this may sound the task of bringing a disruptive party together can seem next to impossible. The goal for the mediator is to bring not only communication to the table but also an agreement.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another strategies of resolutions through in the ADR process in the situation of problems in the Learning Team is the mediation. Team member with current or previous involvement in disputes are not able to intervene as arbitrator. According to "San Diego Court” (2014), Mediation is a confidential, non-binding process in which a trained mediator facilitates communication between disputants and assists parties in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution of all or part of their dispute. The mediator is not the decision-maker and does not resolve the dispute, the parties do. However a mediator is often able to more fully explore the parties' underlying interests, needs and priorities ("San Diego Court ", 2014). The ADR Clause is a faster process and more effective that a litigation.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mediators do not give a final verdict on the case, but only serve as a resource of understanding between both parties. In the case that there is not an agreement, the parties can look to other avenues to resolve the legal issue, whether that be another ADR option, or court. In the same manner, Arbitration also uses a third party to handle disputes. When each party agrees to arbitration, usually an expert in the field is called to facilitate the process. Their responsibility is to listen to what each side has to present, and based on the evidence and information, provide a verdict for the case. Some of these cases can be binding meaning that a decision made by the arbitrator is final. In any other instances, if the case is not binding, then either party has the right to go to court if the verdict is not satisfactory (Arbitration and mediation, n.d.). Sometimes I hybrid version of these two processes, known as Med-Arb, may be the best approach. At the beginning of the process a mediator is established, but if an agreement cannot be reached through mediation, then the mediator takes position as an arbitrator and imposes a binding decision for…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When hearing cases magistrates are advised on points of law by legally qualified clerks, but they must decide on the facts by themselves. They alone must interpret the law and agree on conviction and sentencing, and any suitable costs or compensation. legal advisors must not influence the decision making of the magistrates as the whole idea of magistrates is trial by your peers, as you do not need any qualifications to become a magistrate so they are more representative of society than judges are.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States has two types of court structures which are called a dual court system. Each of the judicial systems has their separate systems one for each of the states and the other for the Federal system. The U.S. Supreme is the only place where the two judicial systems connect.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mediation is defined as an informal, non-binding process where a neutral party helps two other parties’ cone to a mutual resolution where sometimes these conflicts seem impossible to reach when it is left to only both parties (Masucci, 2003).…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unit 23

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages

    This court deals with mainly criminal cases but rarely civil cases. All criminal cases start off in the Magistrates’ Court and are heard by either lay magistrates or district judges. District judges are legally trained but lay magistrates are not, they do however have to be assisted by a legally trained clerk. Magistrate Courts will only hear cases that have happened in their area and can only administer punishment of up to £5,000 or 6 months imprisonment. If the crime requires more than what the magistrate can administer than the case will be passed on to the Crown Court. Jury can also move up the case to the Crown Court if the defendant asks for trial.…

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Georgia's Court System

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Magistrate courts are county courts that hear minor criminal offenses and civil claims involving amounts of $15,000 or less and issue warrants. Magistrate court is the first resort for many civil disputes that may include bad checks, county ordinance violations, landlord/tenant cases, and dispossessories/evictions. In criminal matters magistrates hold preliminary hearings; issue search warrants to law enforcement and also warrants for the arrest of a particular person. No jury trials are held in magistrate court. Rather than by an attorney, civil cases are often argued by the person themselves. The chief magistrate is either elected or appointed in each county. Other magistrates are appointed by the chief magistrate.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court is where disputes are settled, law is born and where individuals accused of criminal crimes are held for trial and sent before a judge to determine their fate. Courts are simply the civilized way of handling an issue in a legal organized manner. It is a critical component of American justice system. Courts id defined by the book as, “An agency or unit of the judicial branch of government, authorized or established by statue or constitution, and consisting of one or more judicial officers, which has authority to decide upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact brought before it.” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worral, 2011). There are four important functions or purposes of the court, Courts are to uphold the law, protect individuals, resolve disputes, and reinforce the social norms.…

    • 949 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    County Courts Case Study

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the textbook, there is a hierarchy of courts in the judiciary system. All the courts share certain functions, however they also vary in their responsibilities.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within the U.S. each state has a court system with a lower court, an appellate court and a Supreme Court that functions similar to the Supreme Court of the U.S. Four levels exist within the State Court: The lower court also known as the court of limited Jurisdiction which represents the first level in which minor cases are seen. Citizens whom are accused of not paying parking fines, those accused of prostitution, DUI and those accused of disorderly conduct in public are also tried in this court.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Criminal Trial Process

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Each court has its own jurisdiction or area over which it has authority to hear matters. Minor matters such as summary offences are dealt with lower in the court hierarchy; the higher courts are reserved for more serious matters, indictable offences and appeals from the lower courts.…

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays