Abstract
Every year since the World Trade Organization replaced the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in 1995, a different country has been inducted as a member of the WTO with hopes of developing harmonious liberalized trade relationships with other members. This phenomenon supports the idea that international economies are becoming more integrated; however, a nation may have certain characteristics which may prevent it from enjoying all the benefits of membership. In the end, the nation may have more to lose. This may be the case of Vietnam, a fast developing nation with a relatively small economy, which joined the WTO in 2007. Although the country will benefit from the WTO dispute mechanism and the increased flow of foreign direct investment and imports, the country can stand to lose in many ways. After joining the organization, Vietnam has experienced underwhelming economic growth and the agricultural sector, which has been a big factor for the economy, has suffered. The country can also face more, extensive welfare losses due to the presence of state-owned enterprises. Vietnam must address specific internal policies to ensure that it can receive as many benefits from WTO guidelines as possible and that adverse side effects are reduced. The downfalls cannot be overlooked and may very well be reasons for the nation to secede from the WTO, 6 years after accession.
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction……..…..………………………………..........
1
1.1 Globalization……………………………………….......
1
1.2 The World Trade Organization….…………………......
1
2.0 Background of Country…………..…………………..........
2
3.0 WTO Membership Advantages for Vietnam….…………..
2
3.1 Vietnam Benefits in Antidumping Disputes………..….
2
3.2 Enterprises Receives Foreign Direct Investment………
3
3.3 Benefits of Increased Imports ………………………....
3
3.4
References: Anwar, S., & Nguyen, L. P. (2010). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(1-2), 183-202. Brambilla, I., Porto, G., & Tarozzi, A. (2012). Adjusting to trade policy: Evidence from US antidumping duties on Vietnamese catfish. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(1), 304-319. Brown, C. P. (2011). Taking stock of antidumping, safeguards, and countervailing duties, 1990 2009. The World Economy, 34, 1955-1998. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01388.x/full Childs, N Carbaugh, R. J. (2008). International Economics. Mason, OH. South-Western Cengage Learning. Cong, D Database. (2013). Vietnam GDP Annual Growth Rate. Trading Economics. Retrieved from http://www.tradingeconomics.com/vietnam/gdp-growth-annual Embassy of the United States Ministry of Planning and Investment. (2012). Report of Foreign Direct Investment in 2012. Ministry of Planning and Investment. Retrieved from http://www.vietnam report.com/vietnam-fdi/ Muzzi, D Nguyen, L. (2004). Vietnam 's 2005 Accession Bid to the WTO: The Harmful Effects Facing Less Developed Countries. Journal of Law & Social Challenges, 6, 131 Shieh, BL Walton, A. R. (2004). Catfish wars: Vietnam’s fight for free trade in the U.S. court of international trade. Pacific Rim & Policy Journal, 13, 471- 502. Whalley,J FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT BY SECTORS IN VIETNAM (Accumulation of projects still valid as of Dec 31st 2012)