According to the Treasury Secretary, these sanctions were meant to defend US businesses and interests from “attempts to undermine our values or threaten the national security of the United States” . In a later statement the White House added: “We take seriously North Korea’s attack that aimed to create destructive financial effects on a US company and to threaten artists and other individuals with the goal of restricting their right to free expression.” While the response was limited, the economic sanctions were meant to send a signal to North Korea (and other potential cyber-attackers) that similar attacks would not be tolerated. It is important to note that at the same time of the implementation of additional sanctions, a series of mysterious Internet outages took place across North Korea. Many audiences believed this was another response to the virtual attack by the US, however, the US government refused to comment whether this was caused by any covert US retaliatory
According to the Treasury Secretary, these sanctions were meant to defend US businesses and interests from “attempts to undermine our values or threaten the national security of the United States” . In a later statement the White House added: “We take seriously North Korea’s attack that aimed to create destructive financial effects on a US company and to threaten artists and other individuals with the goal of restricting their right to free expression.” While the response was limited, the economic sanctions were meant to send a signal to North Korea (and other potential cyber-attackers) that similar attacks would not be tolerated. It is important to note that at the same time of the implementation of additional sanctions, a series of mysterious Internet outages took place across North Korea. Many audiences believed this was another response to the virtual attack by the US, however, the US government refused to comment whether this was caused by any covert US retaliatory