Preview

Walden V. Gina Fiore Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Walden V. Gina Fiore Summary
In this case “Anthony Walden vs. Gina Fiore” they are trying to figure out if the state of Nevada has the right to exercise personal jurisdiction over the case. On August 8, 2006 TSA at San Juan airport searched Gina Fiore and Keith Gipson and their bags where they found about 97,000 dollars cash, Fiore told them that they were just extreme gamblers that had just finished gambling at a local spot El San Juan. Also, she stated that she was a resident of California and Nevada and she planned to catch the flight to Atlanta then take a connected flight to Nevada. Even with that large sum of money they were cleaned and boarded the flight and departed to Atlanta. A law enforcement officer from the San Juan airport contacted the petitioner task force …show more content…
The next day and over the course of a month Fiore had people to make efforts from Nevada to show that the money was indeed legit and have not been earned illegally. The petitioner helped draft an affidavit to show probable cause for forfeiture of the funds. Fiore filed a lawsuit against Walden in the district court of Nevada saying Walden had no probable cause to search and seize the money and for him keeping the money even why he found out that the money was indeed legit. The District Court granted Walden motion to dismiss the case because Nevada had no jurisdiction over the case, for the seizer of the money took place in Georgia. During the appeal a divided panel ended up coming to the verdict that the search and seizer of the money could not support Nevada jurisdiction, however the Nevada had jurisdiction over the alleged false affidavit for knowing it would be a significant connection o Nevada also that delaying the funds would cause foreseeable harm which made this jurisdiction

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Elmer Davis

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page

    This discovery dispute concerns three issues. The first issue is whether plaintiff Elmer Davis is entitled to see defendant National Inc.’s financial records. This effects document request numbers 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12 (attached as Ex. 1). These requests all targets Nationals financial and tax records. While there are also some potential individual issues related to time and scope of the individual discovery requests, each of these requests raises the same threshold question: whether Davis is entitled to see Nationals’ financial records. See in re Garth, 214 S.W. 3d 190, 194 (Tex.App. – Beaumont 2007, Pet. Dism’d) (reversing trial court's order compelling production of financial records beyond what would evidence net worth).…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fifth Circuit Case Summary

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    An introductory practical notation: because it was in the best interests of the client and her case, the time and resources normally devoted to the rehearing process in the Fifth Circuit were shifted entirely to filing a Supreme Court petition.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A young man by the name of Joseph Rivers boarded a train headed from Los Angeles, California. Joseph brought with him the dream of becoming a video movie producer and a total of $16,000, that he and his mother had scraped together to help start this dream. At a stop in Albuquerque, New Mexico, two men boarded Joseph's train and seized his money, leaving him broke and without the funds to continue on with his trip or return home to Michigan. These men who committed this seemly unjust crime, were federal employees who according to the "civil-asset forfeiture" law, were well within their bounds to do so. (Friedersdorf, n.p.).…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Froom V. Butcher (1996)

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Task 4 In this case, although wearing a seat belt is mandatory, it is not counted as a factor determining the responsibilities of the parties. Based on the Maryland Transportation Code, § 22-412.3 - US, it can be seen that seat belts can not be an evidence of the victim negligence, which can reduce the liability of the insurance company or the party causing the damage (General Assembly of Maryland, 2017). For instance, the case of Froom v Butcher [1976] 1 QB 286 (Witting, 2015). The plaintiff was injured in a car accident due to the defendant's negligence.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case was brought up to the Supreme Court over the fortune of a child that would…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The landmark Sheff v. O’Neill Connecticut Supreme Court decision will have a dramatic effect on the state of education in the great state of Connecticut. The de-facto segregation of Connecticut public schools over several years has been a troubling trend that has ultimately led to the decision reached by the court. The low performance of schools in the Hartford area has been a concern of many parents and educators. A child’s education is the most valuable tool a child can receive to prepare themselves for the world. The people of Connecticut must recognize the impact that failing schools can have on the entire state. The people in the Connecticut General Assembly and yourself must act to ensure each child has a chance at fulfilling their God given talents. However, I do not believe the Connecticut Supreme Court was correct in saying that it is the…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument Against Padilla

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The government filled a motion to dismiss this application on the arguments that Padilla’s lawyer could not file and sign the petitioner on his behalf because the lawyer was not proper next friend required in such applications. The government also argued that the respondent was the commander of the navy brig where Padilla was being held and not the Secretary of defense as indicated in the application. In addition, the government contended that the court lacked jurisdiction over the respondent who resided in another…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Eugene V. Deb

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As we floated past Ellis island I thought finally America the land where roads are paved in gold. Coming allway across the great ocean from Italy I can finally do right by my father's name. Man was the view heart racing my heart was thudding in my chest the view of great city and rolling hills yonder. The journey here was long cramped many of puked every night and day baby's would cry but no longer because we are in the land of God. Here every one votes everyone rich everyone has power.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crj: 201 Law Enforcement

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Weeks. Vs. The United States was the case where Fremont Weeks filed suit against the United States for illegally entering his home and seizing papers that were used in his conviction of transporting lottery tickets through the mail. While at work one day the police went to his home, found the key to his home, and entered. After searching his room for evidence the police left with articles and papers that were then turned over to the U.S. Marshal’s. Later the Marshal as well as the police came back to his home and were let in by someone else. They left with additional evidence and neither of them had any type of search warrant. (www.casebriefs.com)…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Quinte Mri Case Notes

    • 2501 Words
    • 11 Pages

    What is the current throughput time – from doctor’s request to receipt of the radiologist’s diagnosis?…

    • 2501 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Cases Solved

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages

    EXPLANATION: The alleged activities and harm occurred in Ecuador; plaintiffs all reside in Ecuador; defendants are not Texas residents; the Republic of Ecuador has objected to the court’s jurisdiction and would probably not enforce any judgment it issued; and jurisdiction would interfere with Ecuador’s sovereign right to control its own environment.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labor Law: Case Studies

    • 13362 Words
    • 54 Pages

    By Resolution10 of September 22, 2005, the Court of Appeals dismissed petitioners ' petition for, inter alia, failure to attach to the petition all material documents, and for defective verification and certification. Petitioners ' Motion for Reconsideration…

    • 13362 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Baleros vs People

    • 5477 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Upon arraignment on February 5, 1992, petitioner, assisted by counsel, pleaded "Not Guilty."5 Thereafter, trial on the merits ensued.…

    • 5477 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reyes was engaged in the RTW business and held transactions with different department stores. She was about to collect payments from the department stores when she was informed that the payments had already been made, through crossed checks issued in her business’ name and the same were deposited with the bank. The bank consequently allowed its transfer to Sayson who later encashed the checks. This prompted Reyes to sue the bank and its manager for the return of the money. The trial and appellate court ruled in her favor.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    IBL exam answers

    • 4609 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Country X Ambassador to USA brought suit in the American Supreme Court against country Y Ambassador to USA seeking to reclaim possession of the property.…

    • 4609 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays