war can never be justified, discuss
War can never be justified. Discuss
War. One of the most destructive and futile thing on our planet, yet the ambition of war is usually to find peace is it not? Battle tends to start over the love of power; William Gladstone once said "We look forward to the time when the Power of Love will replace the Love of Power. Then will our world know the blessings of peace." So therefore is it not correctly speaking by saying that war is needed in order to destroy the love of power that creates such emotions to fight and finally show our world peace? In the eyes of many people there is a justification for a war of defence, none for a war of aggression. But under what terms can you define what the intention for the final outcome is to be known as? How can we ever conclude that some particular wars may be more moral than another?
The past is all we have to learn from. With new generations living in a world where developed countries live in peace and the young are free to grow up in freedom with an education, health care and human rights. This is the generation of money rich countries, such as England that do not see, nor feel the effects of war. Instead it appears in the developing world, where with one glance around you can see children from around the age of 14 years and younger famished, undernourished and anorexic with no one to care, love or even say it will be all right. Children are dependent on the care, empathy, and attention of adults who love them. The war brings Impacts to their childhood, children find themselves without any education during the war as their right of learning is lost, those children who are lucky enough to be found by their government are forced to move into refugee or displaced person camps, where they wait for years in miserable circumstances for normal life to resume, if it ever does, and to them that’s a life line, to us in a developed world with no life experience after being protected in warm loving homes’ our whole lives its seems
War. One of the most destructive and futile thing on our planet, yet the ambition of war is usually to find peace is it not? Battle tends to start over the love of power; William Gladstone once said "We look forward to the time when the Power of Love will replace the Love of Power. Then will our world know the blessings of peace." So therefore is it not correctly speaking by saying that war is needed in order to destroy the love of power that creates such emotions to fight and finally show our world peace? In the eyes of many people there is a justification for a war of defence, none for a war of aggression. But under what terms can you define what the intention for the final outcome is to be known as? How can we ever conclude that some particular wars may be more moral than another?
The past is all we have to learn from. With new generations living in a world where developed countries live in peace and the young are free to grow up in freedom with an education, health care and human rights. This is the generation of money rich countries, such as England that do not see, nor feel the effects of war. Instead it appears in the developing world, where with one glance around you can see children from around the age of 14 years and younger famished, undernourished and anorexic with no one to care, love or even say it will be all right. Children are dependent on the care, empathy, and attention of adults who love them. The war brings Impacts to their childhood, children find themselves without any education during the war as their right of learning is lost, those children who are lucky enough to be found by their government are forced to move into refugee or displaced person camps, where they wait for years in miserable circumstances for normal life to resume, if it ever does, and to them that’s a life line, to us in a developed world with no life experience after being protected in warm loving homes’ our whole lives its seems