War Dogs

This paper will be discussing the corporate responsibility of War Dogs which is the movie I have chosen to write about. Is it ethical or not ethical? Some of it depends on how you feel about weapons and also the distribution of them. It also depends on how you feel about war and someone profiting off of the need for ammunition for defense. Is it lacking in corporate social responsibility, because of laws broken and mismanagement of the corporation AEY? It is a movie about two international arms dealers that were able to land a $298 million contract with the government and supply ammunition to special forces in Afghanistan, the company AEY committed fraud by breaking the government contract that prohibited them from selling or delivering items from China.

David Packouz was self-employed as a
(5). Edmund Byrne an author of the Journal of Business finds that the arms industry fails to meet any of the four corporate social responsibility requirements, because their products are crucial to national defense. (5) He contends that many of these companies function not as dutiful agents of a nation-state but as a political powerful entity in their own right. (5) In conclusion, they should he held responsible for the foreseeable consequences that flow from use of their products. (5). As a responsibility to human rights standards he believes involving arms in war crimes and violation of human’s rights and they do not meet CSR. So, as an extension of this article Efraim and David being a middle man and procuring these weapons and re-selling them could suggest they would be lacking the corporate social responsibility as well. With that being said war was profitable for these two very young men and if they would have just stayed in the lane of legal government contract biding they would have been very