Preview

War In Stephen Crane's A Mystery Of Heroism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
446 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War In Stephen Crane's A Mystery Of Heroism
How could war be kind? War cannot be kind. Throughout Stephen Crane’s stories, we learn he is opposed to the civil war. Stephen Crane uses sarcasm in “War is Kind” and then gives gruesome details of a soldier’s experience in “A Mystery of Heroism” to prove he is opposed to the war. Sarcasm is meant to provoke thought and to poke fun at the other topic. “War is Kind” uses sarcasm to explain the horrors of war, and the effect it has on those related to those in the war. “Great is the battle-god, great, and his kingdom a field where a thousand corpses lie.” Obviously a field littered with a thousand corpses isn’t a great thing. But the sarcasm changes how the the words are perceived. The sarcasm explains the big impact the war has on the soldiers. These soldiers were ordered to fight and die, or, “die for the cause,” because that’s what they thought was the right thing to do. We even learn of a …show more content…
Some might even fight back, but in “A Mystery of Heroism” we are told about soldiers who seem to ignore the war going on around them. “In the midst of it all, Smith and Ferguson, two privates of A Company, were engaged in a heated discussion, which involved the greatest questions of the national existence.” While most people like to argue, they should be focused on surviving and maybe even winning. Not proving how much more they know than someone else about the national existence. But they’ve been under gun-fire for so long that they’re just used to it. “But suddenly his face straightened and he called: ‘Say young man, give me a drink of water, will you?’” Before this was spoken, this man had lost an arm and is still trapped under his horse, so how could he suddenly perk up and ask for a drink of water, obviously he didn’t and it was some sort of illusion or delusion. One of the gruesome details is his predicament, he is pinned under his horse, lost his arm, and was about to cry out for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    | This quote is about the emotional baggage of men at risk of dying. O’Brien writes that barely restrained cowardice is a common secret among soldiers. He debunks the notion that men go to war to be heroes. Instead, he says they go because they are forced to and because refusal equals cowardice.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From time to time soldiers realize that “the war [is] full of freaks” who killed without out a reason because they were told to do so(O’Brien 9). There is no individuality anymore, just robotic actions of killing and returning to your bunk just to get up the next morning to continue killing, or potentially being killed; every single of them is being morphed into killing machine, each of them understands the pain of the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “He, too, threw down his gun and fled. He ran like a rabbit.” (Stephen Crane, page 33). Running away is what basically defines a coward, and that is what Henry does. Just because others were doing it, doesn't make it right. Henry made the choice to join the war, even after his mother warned him, so it was his responsibility to stay and fight. Instead, Henry runs away and tries to convince himself that it was the right thing to do, but deep down he knows that this situation makes him a coward.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, the mental weight the troops carry during the war continuously define them throughout their experience. One such heavy load is the need for the young men to stand up to the tension between fantasy and reality. Immediately after Ted Lavender's death, “he pictured Martha’s smooth young face, thinking he loved her more than anything...” (O’Brien). Cross believes his distractions caused him to be negligent, and as a result, one of his men died. For this reason, he later burns Martha’s letters and photographs, and concludes that he will never again have fantasies. Furthermore, the soldiers carry the mental load of keeping up with their reputations. “Rather, they were too frightened to be cowards.” That being said, these men killed…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard is not one of those people. He wanted to go to war, he did not hesitate, because for him, going to war was better than staying in Chicago, where the riots where going on. The book, he said, was very romanticized, and didn’t describe the war realistically enough. He did not agree with the way, many things were described. As described in the book, the soldiers killed, because they were embarrassed not to (p. 20). Howard said, that they didn’t kill because they were afraid of “blushing”, but because they had to, they wanted to survive.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No More Heroes Analysis

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In No More Heroes, a study of madness and psychiatry in war, Richard Gabriel points out that contrary to what is in the movies, television, and the military, it is not only the weak and cowardly who break down in battle. In truth, everyone is subject to breaking down in war, “perhaps most telling, not only are there no personalities or demographic factors which are associated with psychiatric collapse; neither are there any factors associated with heroism. It’s impossible to predict which soldiers will collapse and which will behave bravely”. He also adds, “There is no statistical difference in the rates of psychiatric breakdown among inexperienced troops and battle-hardened veterans.” When all is said and done, all ‘normal’ men are at risk in war.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facing fear, danger, or adversity in the physical or moral realm shapes a person’s identity and core values and often influences the psychological effects of a person. Courage, bravery, and responsibility often define the results of fear relative to the situation a person has overcome or failed. Military personnel experience a substantial amount of diverse situations which forces dynamic impacts of emotions with fear and courage the prime focus on the spectrum. To include war in the lives of military society adds an intense stress to address courage and fear in order for self-preservation of mind in those affected. In Tim Obrien’s If I Die in a Combat Zone, fear and courage are often relayed as a constant struggle frequently pushing the soldier’s…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Even after seeing the “elephant”, a metaphor used by McPherson in place of battle, the men remained determined to fight. They came to realize that courage meant to stand up against and conquer their fear, not just feeling fear itself. It was at its worse before the battle had even begun. Once it began only their courage and adrenaline could keep them going. They also began of noticing ways to relieve their tension. One way was yelling at the top of their lungs, and this it to be thought as the origin of the famous Rebel Yell. The men didn’t understand the changing in their body chemistry, so they were dumbfounded when they could overcome illness, disabilities, and sometimes-even wounds in order to…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similarly to Hardy and Owen, Shakespeare makes war seem a corrupting force both physically and mentally. War turned the Macbeth who was praised by the King, into a Macbeth who was killing people regardless of who they were and also a Macbeth who was disgraced and humiliated in the latter end of his life and after he died. Owen also faced this corrupting force through war, because he says, ‘In all my dreams, before my helpless sight, He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.’ This shows how terrible nightmares and flashbacks are caused by participation in war. A much more unsophisticated version of this corruption can be seen in The Man He Killed because the ‘soldier’ killed a person who had never wronged him in any way and had he had met him outside of war, he would have ‘treat, if met where any bar is, Or help to half a crown.’…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opioid overdoses have recently become a notably broad issue over the past few years, taking the lives of over 250,000 Americans. With this problem raging out of control, safe injection sites are not a valid response to the opioid epidemic for four main reasons: there are other beneficial ways we can respond, government spendings will become an issue, the atmosphere of the injection site will be alarming, and lastly, providing drugs will not help the patient become drug-free.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil War Era

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Cattle Herding – A Brief HistoryArticle Selections: The Origin of Cattle Driving & Beef Trade – Pre/Post Civil War…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This quote connects the theme: war destroys a person’s individuality. War makes a soldier bloodthirsty at times. Soldiers may have been kind and caring toward others, but in war, the necessity of survival is greater than ones of comrades. If a soldier’s comrade has been shot and are about to die, one would take their belongings in order to better protect oneself from further injuries. In a time of war, it does not matter about a soldier’s past personality, one gunshot could end a life, so soldiers react in order to protect themselves, to look on to the future, after the…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This playing around with the truth is what makes the soldiers skeptical of what is true and what isn 't. They see things differently as they are happening. They know what is happening at that point in time but their mind sees it in a different lighting. O 'Brien tells a story about a fellow soldier killed by a land mine. His name was Curt Lemon. He and another soldier were playing catch with a smoke grenade and Lemon takes a half step too far and steps on the land mine. However, that 's not how O 'Brien sees it. He sees Lemon step out from the dark tree canopy and into the sunlight. The sunlight seems to carry him up into the tree and he disappears. O 'Brien calls it beautiful. There 's nothing beautiful about a man being killed but that 's how he saw it. That 's how his mind saw it. During the war a soldier can get so used to death and killing. Maybe by just seeing it happen so often that they start to critique it and see the beauty in it. This is what the soldiers see then in that moment but when they go back and retrieve that memory they don 't know what is true and what isn 't true. The war has affected…

    • 1717 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tim O’Brien explores this concept when he simply states, “he was soldier, after all” (O’Brien 23). They must become a cog on the “big wheel…avoid shame” (Pollock 14). War connects men and connect them. Soldiers must prove their worthiness and bravery, not to themselves but to the soldiers that stand beside them. Soldier’s carry the “greatest fear which was the fear of blushing…. It was what brought them to war in the first place, the blush of dishonor” (O’Brien 20). Even though Jimmy Cross wanted to become a “draft dodger”, he knew that cowardliness would follow him for the rest of his life. He felt a responsibility to the men that would stand beside him. He would give up his live; he would not question; there would be no logic. He would be a “real man” and fight. In taking this action, O’Brien expresses the philosophy that the only person who can understand the thoughts of a solider is another solider. Troops walk a path that is unknown to society, but understood by the man who stands next to them on the battlefront. O’Brien continues the exploration of this group dynamics when Cross gives up his personal dream, because of the guilt he feels for the death of fellow solider Lavender. Cross burns the weight of his letters to become more adjusted to the group. He has let go of “sissy stuff...and fell to stereotypically masculine ways” (Pollock 14). In doing this a “new hardness develops in his stomach”…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The floating egg experiment – How much salt is needed to make an egg float?…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays