(Attracting the reader)Do you think there is a” just war” in the history of world? Do you think it is the only way to solve problem by war? (Providing background) Different people have different opinion. Herbert hover, who is the 31st President of the United States have ever said:” Whether you have to fight for justice or not, war is a crime! “In his opinion, whether the war is just or unjust, it is cruel, and the death is inevitable. Marxist thought, making clear the nature of war is the necessary premise to decide the attitude toward the war. Lenin had ever divided the war into reactionary war and revolution. And Mao Zedong further made the theory summary, and clearly point out that the war in the history is only just and unjust. All counter-revolutionary wars that hinder the progress of the history is just war, and all the revolution wars that promote the social progress is just war. The war the people for freedom and social progress, in order to get rid of the exploitation and oppression, or in order to safeguard national independence and resist foreign invasion is just. (Framing the question)But do you think what they said is absolutely true? Countries often regard the self-defense war or the nature of the national liberation war as a just war and the war of aggression or fight for supremacy as unjust war on their official history. Countries often use propaganda tool to explain casually the nature of the war because of political interests. (Stating my opinion) Personally, I think the nature of justice and injustice of war is relative in most cases, and future generations may have a lot of different interpretations. For example, in our country, many people may think North American war of independence, Latin American war of independence, the Anti-Japanese War and resisting U.S. aggression and aid Korea is a just war; And world war I, seven years' war, the thirty years war, the Crusades, in 1916 America's invasion of repression of revolutionary action, and
(Attracting the reader)Do you think there is a” just war” in the history of world? Do you think it is the only way to solve problem by war? (Providing background) Different people have different opinion. Herbert hover, who is the 31st President of the United States have ever said:” Whether you have to fight for justice or not, war is a crime! “In his opinion, whether the war is just or unjust, it is cruel, and the death is inevitable. Marxist thought, making clear the nature of war is the necessary premise to decide the attitude toward the war. Lenin had ever divided the war into reactionary war and revolution. And Mao Zedong further made the theory summary, and clearly point out that the war in the history is only just and unjust. All counter-revolutionary wars that hinder the progress of the history is just war, and all the revolution wars that promote the social progress is just war. The war the people for freedom and social progress, in order to get rid of the exploitation and oppression, or in order to safeguard national independence and resist foreign invasion is just. (Framing the question)But do you think what they said is absolutely true? Countries often regard the self-defense war or the nature of the national liberation war as a just war and the war of aggression or fight for supremacy as unjust war on their official history. Countries often use propaganda tool to explain casually the nature of the war because of political interests. (Stating my opinion) Personally, I think the nature of justice and injustice of war is relative in most cases, and future generations may have a lot of different interpretations. For example, in our country, many people may think North American war of independence, Latin American war of independence, the Anti-Japanese War and resisting U.S. aggression and aid Korea is a just war; And world war I, seven years' war, the thirty years war, the Crusades, in 1916 America's invasion of repression of revolutionary action, and