Preview

War Is Health of State Single Souce Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
363 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Is Health of State Single Souce Essay
‘War is Health of the State’ Howard Zinn argues that American capitalism, through international rivalry caused by the Great War, caused big breaches between the power of big business and the voice of the working class to determine the stance of participation in the war. Zinn therefore recollects numerous tactics throughout that time, such as the Espionage Act of 1917 which was, “used to imprison Americans who spoke or wrote against the war,” (Zinn, p. 67). Since many individuals did not express their acceptance of supporting the cause of WWI, many were punished or discriminated against for their reluctance to defend. Zinn also disputes the claim that industrialists and political leaders, in regards to affluence, “talked of prosperity as if it were classless,” (Zinn, p. 64). As if prosperity were the only reason to support the war, the American people were more condemned to support rather than oppose if they were to maintain their position in society; they were fighting the rich man’s war whether they liked it or not. Zinn’s argument implies that the “classless” war was most definitely still a “class” war between industrialists vs. working class Americans. The benefit of the war, profit from labor and support to allied countries, was advantaging the people in power at the time and forcing men to contribute to a ruthless war without opposition without punishment. Given Zinn’s recitals of resistance, trials, and serving time, he argues in favor of the individuals who were under-represented in their rights to freedom of speech and declares the implemented power of authority over the people. Zinn’s reoccurring stories of disagreement concerning the people’s outlook of the war are particularly effective in supporting his argument against industrialism and power during the Great War. Since American’s live in a current society that wholeheartedly backs the freedom of individualism and expressionism, his argument paves a direct path of progress and comparison


Cited: Zinn, Howard. Chpt 3: "War is the Health of the State" The Twentieth Century of People 's History. New York: Harper & Row. 61-78.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the months preceding America’s entrance into the second World War, skepticism about US involvement, particularly by more conservative minds was naturally very high. But by the time America had wholly committed to active engagement in World War II, disputes over isolationism versus interventionism had transformed into new, more pressing issues of the time. Regarding price controls and rationing of consumer goods and civil rights for African Americans, voices by partisans of either side rang like sirens throughout the country. Going into the war, it became paramount that the entire country would need to mobilize for the war effort. This mobilization movement would be criticized by some conservatives to be fascist.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the book private Archie Lemon thinks about the war that suppose to “end injustice,” and that he doesn't mind getting killed, because the people coming after him will live in “happiness and peace” (23). Such a false propaganda is recognized by soldiers fifty pages later. They realize that the war “was brought about moneyed interests for its own selfish ends,” because idealism and patriotism have nothing to do with the war. They call it brutal and degrading, and, “fools who fight, are pawns shoved about to serve the interest of others” (96). March in the 30s recognizes of what the war becomes in the twenty first century; a character name Sergeant Theodore Donohoe back then sees the war as a business (because today it is fought for the territory or land resources); he states that in order to get anywhere in it, one has to adjust oneself to its peculiarities and “play the cards the way they fall” (30). Unfortunately, not a lot of soldiers have learned or will ever learn how to play this game…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Annie Haunton Dr. Brandon – G Block 305 American Studies 4 September 2015 History as One’s Interpretation In the opening chapter of A People’s History of the United States, the author, Howard Zinn, admits that he abandons neutrality and presents bias in order to tell the history of the United States from the victim’s perspective. Howard Zinn is a well-known historian and author, who has authored dozens of historical books and articles including You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train and A People’s History of the United States, written three plays, and spoken at many political and social rallies. When his most famous book, A People’s History, was first published in 1980, Zinn’s statements caused an uproar within the scholastic community,…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prompt 1: According to Randolph Bourne, “War is the health of the State” (qtd Zinn par 1). This seems to be at least a partially true statement, as the nations of Europe went to war in that fateful year, 1914, the governments thrived and patriotism in those countries increased, even though young men died in appalling numbers on the battlefields. Meanwhile, in the U.S., the health of the state was of some concern.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Where to begin with the multitude of facts left out? Such hints equating material inequities with injustice abound in Zinn’s history. Zinn banks on the fact that schools produce graduates with only “a smattering of knowledge about the American past” at best—and almost no understanding about the foundations and intellectual history of our government. Other questions come up in regards to the rationale of our system of government. Zinn, in what has now become standard practice, indicts the founders for leaving out of the idea of all men being “created equal” black men, property-less men, and women. Then he preempts the reply that such exclusions have since been corrected by claiming that The problem of democracy in the post-Revolutionary society was not, however, Constitutional limitations on voting. It lay deeper, beyond the Constitution, in the division of society into rich and poor. For if some people had great wealth and great influence; if they had the land, the money, the newspapers, the church, the educational system—how could voting, however broad, cut into such power? There was still another problem: wasn’t it the nature of representative government, even when most broadly based, to be conservative, to prevent tumultuous change?20 Indeed, this sets up the basis for the rest of Zinn’s critique through over 700 tedious pages. All of Zinn’s analyses of succeeding events and developments follow from the flawed premise and the unwillingness to acknowledge the fact that his question had already been answered by the founders. Differences arise also from Zinn’s goals. Zinn is after “tumultuous change.” He seeks to overthrow the government rather than reform it. And he will display this view in his academic activities, especially when it comes to the civil rights movement. The need for “tumultuous” change will inform like-minded radicals who will keep raising the bar even as…

    • 4694 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Australia 1920's

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The war, which had at first submerged national divisions in a wave of patriotism, had in its last years deepened those divisions, increasing the gulf between radicals and conservatives, those eligible who had fought and those who had not, and adding new divisions between pro- and anti- conscriptionists and between strikers and ‘loyalist’ strike breakers.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Howard Zinn challenges the American identity by suggesting that America is just as bad as Great Britain in that the countries are both incredibly elitist. Going back to the founding fathers, the U.S. has an uneven distribution of wealth, and the founding fathers wanted to oppress the lower class. Once the lower class realized this, riots were held against the elites.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the end of World War I, the citizens of the United States began to experience the transition from a war-effort focus to an artistic, cultural and capitalistic-driven society. The increasing rise of new capitalists establishes new social classes that not only define the identity of risk-taking entrepreneurs in the Roaring Twenties, but also contributes to an even greater divide between the traditional of-the-earth working class citizens and their wealthy and opulent counterparts. These demographics are easily visible by a person’s wealth and assets, however beneath the surface each class also carries an unwritten set of explicit ethical attributes. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel The Great…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people are to believe that when the capitalist declared war upon one another, it was their patriotic duty to cut one another's throats for the profit and glory of the rulers. To what does the working class gain? Nothing. The capitalist class have always declared the wars meanwhile the working class always fought the battles. The capitalist class has had all to gain and nothing to lose.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too Big to Fail\

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The article “A Movement Too Big to Fail” by Chris Hedges with his criticism of “faux liberal reformers, whose abject failure to stand up for the rights of the poor and the working class, have signed on to this movement because they fear becoming irrelevant”(Hedges) to the reformers along with heads of financial leaders. Through non violent movements and protests against those who threaten the lower class wellbeing, that somehow they as a group gathering for the greater interests can show that others do exist and this is their way of saying that we as a whole united can make a difference and that we as Americans have that right to voice our opinions. It happened in the 1960’s, with the Vietnam war, nonviolent protesting made known that many people of the united states were against the war. Just like what we were doing in the 60s is no different from now, when the “union leaders pull down salaries five times that of their superiors”(Hedges).…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Team America: World Police

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the aftermath of World War II, every nation of the world emerged mentally and, in some cases, physically altered. The physical affects of the Second World War spanning from Pearl Harbor to the battleground that made up most of Western Europe to Nagasaki and Hiroshima are visual pictures engrained in the minds of all, past and present, but the American ideology that these destructive images helped to give rise to would directly shape American domestic and foreign policy for approximately the next 50 years and indirectly shape the current policies implemented in the United States today. The United States, a world super power, entered World War II in December, 1941. The apprehensive and notably late involvement of the U.S. provided Allied Powers with fresh combatants and monetary backing that the Axis Powers lacked. America's late entrance and unprecedented force, which inevitably led to the end of the war in favor of the Allies, further cemented America's place as a world power. Although the United States gained its world power status before entering World War II because of its economic rise attributable to industrialization, rail roads, and abundant capital, America could be viewed in a "world tier" of its own for stepping in during a world war and ultimately ending the German force responsible for genocide. This world power standing in conjunction with the worldwide view of America's benevolent intervention has been best defined and articulated by Henry Luce as "American exceptionalism." Thus far, this historical summary has been one of optimism and American chivalry, but it has also been a historical account of an image which did not entirely exist. It is true that the United States entered the war and played a major role in ending World War II, but America's image to the rest of the world could partially be described as one of illusion – a form of propaganda issued by executives with an agenda, optimistic journalists, and the general American public.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War 2

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first essay G.I Joe: Fighting for Home by John Morton Blum and the second essay American Liberals: Fighting for a Better World by Alan Brinkley both 'look at the experience of the war from different vantage points: that of the soldier fighting for his own elemental survival as well as for his country, and that of the society back home.”…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hedges, Chris. “War is a Force that gives Us Meaning.” New York; Anchor, 2005, 2-14.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Zieger, Robert H. (2000). America 's Great War: World War I and the American Experience. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays