Preview

War Power And The Executive Branch

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
191 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Power And The Executive Branch
War powers between the legislative and the executive branch is an important and complex issue in American national politics because there are multiple interpretations of what constitutes the appropriate relationship between the legislative and the executive branch in regard to war powers. Both Louis Fisher in his book, Presidential War Power and John Yoo in his book, The Power of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11 focus on what is the appropriate sharing of war powers between the legislative and executive branch? Fisher and Yoo are both scholars in this area of study but have different opinions on what constitutes as sharing of war powers between the legislative and the executive branch. This paper will focus on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Political scientist Edward S. Corwin once observed that “the history of the presidency has been a history of aggrandizement.” Explain and critique Corwin’s observation from the standpoint of the allocation of constitutional powers and the Supreme Court’s interpretation of presidential…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the War Powers Resolution, the Commander in Chief can only send American personnel abroad to take military action against another country only with a declaration of war from Congress. However, according to “statutory authority” or in the case of an attack on the United States, the president reserves the right to take action against a sovereign country, given that the president has issued a forty-eight hour notice to Congress, and the personnel remain active for no longer than sixty days. This important resolution severely limits the power of the Commander in Chief, and lays within the system of checks of balances which is vitally integral to the United States government.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman’s involvement with the Korean War is another example of how past presidential practices have not maintained the Constitution’s original intent between the balance of power and limits. In deciding to go to war against North Korea, Truman acted unilaterally and never even sought Congress’s authorization. He did not even seek retroactive approval. Indeed, “President Truman had altered the Constitution by taking the country to war against North Korea without either formal declaration or statutory authorization, relying instead on resolutions passed by the UN Security Council.” In his work, John Yoo persistently quotes that James Madison, “wanted to prevent the president from using his war powers to enhance his overall power and importance…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On May 10th 1801, Yusuf Karamanli, the Pasha of Tripoli, ordered the United States flag cut down in front of the U.S. Consulate. This act sprung the United States into its first armed conflict overseas and ignited the domestic debate over presidential war powers for centuries to come. The First Barbary War was a result of President Thomas Jefferson refusing to pay tributes to the Barbary States, due to piracy. Congress never formally declared war, but we’ll examine Jefferson’s power as a President, to take hostile action.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The President of the United States is a very important and strong leader that does not have the right to officially go to war without the approval of Congress. This law is dubbed the War Powers Act since it states that the President has to notify Congress when sending troops to hostilities and if in a state of emergency, 42 hours after (SAS Institute Inc). Presidents in the past, like President Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, have argued that by enforcing the War Powers Act, Congress is taking away constitutional authorities that have been exercised for many years. On the other hand, people, such as George Mason, claim that giving the power to declare war to one singular person is a very untrustworthy situation (SAS Institute Inc). This argument…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman Vs Framer

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main general argument that Yoo makes in The Power of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11, is that the President has the right to declare war. In regard to war making, the Framers went to different authorities such as John Locke for advice…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think The Executive branch is the most power in the constitution because the president is in charge of this branch. My reasons why this branch has the most power is that after the people select a president, they get elected for four years. Also, the president will become commander and chief of the military,and lastly the executive branch is responsible of executing…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two perspectives on Presidential power are power as persuasion and unilateral power. Since Presidents’ power is to persuade, they have far less formal power than the necessary to meet the large expectations over them. Presidents take to office their goals and expectations for public policy, but to accomplish these, they must work with the Congress. Congress and the presidency were created to avoid one single institution from having control over policymaking. Presidents’ power involves the bargaining that derives from their position, reputation, prestige and reputation (Howell). They make their personal impact on the choices of what should be said or done, how and when.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over two hundred years ago people were asking how powerful should the president be? Is he too powerful now? Today, in the twenty-first century, political scientist, constituent, and even politicians are asking the same questions. One of the most notable debates over this subject stems from a disagree between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton preferred a larger executive while Jefferson preferred a smaller one. When George Washington declared neutrality during a war between Britain and France, Jefferson did not believe that Washington had the constitutional power to do this. Hamilton decided to respond; he did so by publishing articles under the pseudonym, Pacificus.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    24. What is the power of the President to make war without the consent of Congress called?…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S. Entry into World War I

    • 2042 Words
    • 59 Pages

    Woodrow Wilson delivered his now-famous War Message to Congress on April 4, 1917. Four days later, Congress declared war and the United States became a formal partner in the war to end all wars. As the Wilson administration was to discover, however, declaring war and making war were two very different propositions. The former required only an abstract statement of ideals and justifications and a two-thirds Congressional majority; the latter required the massive mobilization of virtually every sector of American society - military, industrial, and economic, as well as public opinion. The Wilson administration sought to accomplish this daunting task in two concomitant and interdependent fashions. First, it undertook an unprecedented assumption of federal control and regulation. The federal government established an array of bureaus and agencies endowed with sweeping powers to regulate the nation’s economy and industrial production. Furthermore, it passed a series of laws designed to support these agencies and to stifle what it deemed subversive antiwar opinion and activity. Second, and of equal importance, the administration appealed to the public’s patriotism and sense of civic responsibility, effectively encouraging volunteerism in both the public and private sectors. Each of these tacks was bulwarked by a pervasive dose of pro-war government propaganda. In the end, in terms of raising an army, mobilizing the economy and influencing the outcome of the war, the administration’s mobilization efforts were largely successful. However, there were significant consequences to the government’s actions, most acutely in the realm of civil liberties, both during and in the aftermath of the war. One of the earliest examples of federal muscle in wartime mobilization was the passage of the Lever Act in August 1917. The act gave the president the power to regulate supplies and prices of food and fuel by creating two new government agencies: the United States Food Administration…

    • 2042 Words
    • 59 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the intentions of the founding fathers in their deliberations about whether to make the executive branch weak or strong is a murky task. Like nearly all questions about the true intentions of the founders, there was hardly any consensus, and the only consensus that was possible was a middle ground between a strong executive and a weak one. Gouverneur Morris explained the goal as “make him too weak: the Legislature will usurp his powers… make him too strong” and “[he] will usurp on the Legislature.” There was a delicate balance of creating an effective, independent Executive and having him be responsive to pressures from the people. To many, including Morris, the tyranny that needed to be protected against was not executive, but legislative. The Executive was supposed to act as a check on the legislature and be the “great…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legislative branch of the federal government, which is the congress, consists of two houses. Which are the Senate and the House of Representatives. Congress power’s that is allowed under the Constitution are to levy taxes, borrow money, regulate interstate commerce, impeach and convict the president, declare war, discipline its own membership, and determine its rules of procedure. Revenue Bill’s, which must commence in the House of Representatives, or legislative bills may come from either house. Although they must pass both houses and be signed by the president to…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Congress passed the War Powers Act in response to presidential use of the military during…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays