Preview

War Strategic Planning Changed By Sultan Muhammad Al-Fatih

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1075 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Strategic Planning Changed By Sultan Muhammad Al-Fatih
Abstract Al-Fatih was an Ottoman leadership figure who was characterized as wise, of great fame and a leader to be reckoned with. His figure, leadership and wisdom can be seen in his successful war strategies against enemies in each and every military expedition. The objective of this article is to analyze war strategic planning undertaken by Sultan Muhammad al-Fatih in a series of wars and the opening of territories which led to Ottoman’s victories and success.

Key words: Muhammad al-Fatih ,War Strategy ,Ottoman Military History

1

Introduction

Transformational leaders are the ones who direct organizations for progress by generating new ideas and perspectives. Organizations will be able to survive and adapt to environmental changes if they can increase the capacity of their organizational change. Transformational leaders are the leaders that have business goals to be achieved and high enthusiasm for drastic changes. Transformational leadership can be defined as increasing the interest of the employees to achieve higher performance and developing the
…show more content…
At the age of 21, he conquered Istanbul in 1453 and brought an end to the Byzantian Empire. As being one of the most powerful empires in the world history, Mehmed the Conqueror is not the sultan who established only the profile of the following sultans and the geographic foundations of the Empire, but also improved political and social institutions of the Ottoman Empire and shaped the future political developments. After the death of his father in 1451, Mehmed the Conqueror ascended the throne and he not only strengthened the navy forces, but also erected a powerful fortress (Rumeli Hisarı) on the European side of the Bosphorus, just across the castle on the Asian side (Anadolu Hisarı) for the conquest of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ap World History Dbq Essay

    • 3685 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The Ottomans conquered Constantinople and ended the Byzantine Empire in what year? For seven weeks in the spring of 1453, the army of the Ottoman sultan, Mehmed II, “The Conqueror,” which numbered well over 100,000, assaulted the triple ring of land walls that had protected the city for centuries. The outnumbered forces of the defenders repulsed attack after attack until the sultan ordered his gunners to batter a portion of the walls with their massive siege cannon. Wave after wave of Ottoman troops struck at the gaps in the defenses that had been cut by the guns, quickly overwhelmed the defenders, and raced into the city to loot and pillage for the three days that Mehmed had promised as their reward for victory.…

    • 3685 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under Suleiman, popularly known as "the Magnificent" or "the Lawmaker” the Ottoman Empire reached its peak in its military and political power. Suleiman's armies conquered Hungary, over which the Ottomans maintained control for over 150 years, and they advanced as far west as Vienna, threatening the Habsburgs. To the east, the Ottoman forces took control of Iraq from the Safavids of Iran. In the Mediterranean, their navy captured all the main North African ports, and for a time the Ottoman fleet completely dominated the sea. For a time the Ottoman fleet completely dominated the sea. By the end of Suleiman's reign, the Ottoman Empire extended over a great portion of Europe, Asia, and Africa.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The forms of conquest and domination throughout the Middle East and Central Asia varied greatly throughout the centuries. The most successful empires were able to expand and exert their dominance through tactics that had not been utilized in previous empires. While the Umayyad and Safavid empires were powerful, the Ottoman and Mongol Empires became two of the strongest empires in the Middle East and Central Asia due to their inclusion of minorities, powerful tactics, and expansion through military force and trade.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    history sbq

    • 1398 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “mostly concerned about the military” is defined as prioritizing the ottoman military over other issues in the state. Source A supports the hypothesis wheres source b, c ,d and e opposes the hypothesis. This essay disagrees with the hypothesis and believes that the sources show that Suleiman the Magnificent was not mostly concerned about the military…

    • 1398 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The three articles used for this comparison matrix looked at transformational leadership and how it affects those in relation to each study. The three articles were all written with a different purpose in mind, with all three correlating to the same hypothesis, “How does transformational leadership affect employees/individuals in different settings?” With similarities found in topic, it was also evident that there were several contrasting variables within each article. The three empirical articles that were utilized for this comparison were as follows: Transformational Leadership in the Public Sector: Does Structure Matter, written by: Bradley Wright and Sanjay Pandey, The Effect Of Transactional and Transformational Leadership Styles on the Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction of Customer Contact Personnel, written by: Charles Emery and Katherine Barker, and Principal Leadership and Student Achievement: What is the Effect of Transformational Leadership in Conjunction with Instructional Leadership on Student Achievement, written by: William Greb.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    • Collapse of Seljuk Turkic of Rum in E Anatolia in 1243(Ottomans could seize power…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ottoman Empire Dbq

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lasting more than six centuries, this Empire was one of the longest, best organized, and most enduring political entities in world history.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Transformational organizers display personalized consideration, intelligent stimulation, inspirational enthusiasm, captivation, and unrealistic influence (Weichun, Sosik, Riggio, & Baiyin, 2012). According to the scholarly article, “Transformational Leadership and Value System Congruence,” written by Krishnan Venkat, it states, “ that transformational organizers gave better meaning to standards pertaining to others than to ethics concerning only themselves” (Venkat, 2002). The transformational leadership style is highly effective at changing a culture and motivating to go beyond their own self-interests for the good of their group.…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ottomans, first under Selim and through to Suleiman the Magnificent captured Constantinople and were powerful in the Eastern Mediterranean with the use of gunpowder and firearms. Suleiman’s conquest of…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The devastation of the Black Death following hard on the heels of the Mongol destruction of Islam’s most important city and capital of the Abbasid Empire, Baghdad, eliminated Islam’s old political order. Nonetheless, these two catastrophes prepared the way for new Islamic states to emerge. Of these, the Ottoman, the Safavid, and the Mughal dynasties ultimately grew powerful enough to become empires themselves. The most powerful, the Ottoman Empire, occupied the pivotal area between Europe and Asia. They embraced a Sunni view of Islam, while adopting traditional Byzantine ways of governance and trying new ways of integrating the diverse peoples of their expanding territories.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1450 and 1750, three great Muslim empires arose—the Ottomans, the Safavids, and the Mughals. The Ottomans arose after the Seljuk Turkic kingdom of Rum in Eastern Anatolia collapsed, which occurred because of a Mongol invasion in 1243. The area fell into a chaotic period after that because the Mongols did not directly rule it. In search of riches, Turkic peoples, including the Ottomans who dominated the rest, flooded into the area. By the 1350s, the Ottomans were advancing from their Asia Minor strongholds. Under Mehmed I, they conquered a large part of the Balkans, and, in 1453, they captured Constantinople of the Byzantine Empire under Mehmed II, “The Conqueror,” thus establishing an empire from the Balkans that included most of the Arab world. Like the Ottomans, the Safavids arose from struggles of rival Turkish tribes. In the fourteenth century, there were decades of fierce struggles, until, finally, after three successive Safavid leaders died, a Sufi commander named Ismâ’il survived. He and his followers conquered the city of Tabriz in 1501, as well as most of Persia in the next decade. They then drove the Ozbegs, neighboring nomadic Turks, back to Central Asia and advanced to Iraq. Lastly, the Mughal Dynasty was founded by Babur, who descended from Turkic warriors. He first led an invasion of India in 1526 and conquered the Indus and Ganges plains. After Babur died of an illness, his son, Humayan, succeeded him and was attacked from enemies of all sides because of Babur’s death. He was expelled from India in 1540, but eventually restored Mughal rule by 1556. Humayan’s son, Akbar, would later succeed him and become the greatest ruler in Mughal history. The Ottomans, Safavids and Mughals constructed significant empires, but each adopted different ways of treating their conquered people and developed diverse methods for managing social, political, and economic systems.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Research questions in the three articles were presented by the authors. The first article questioned the reported practice of transformational leadership behavior being high or low depending on the support of higher levels of transformational leadership in those organizations. Which differs from another article on transformational leadership by Emery and Barker(2007) in that it emphasizes transformational leadership 's goals are to align the goals of the workers, who have direct contact with customers, to management. As these values align with management, greater…

    • 2522 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Butterfild, B. J. (1997). The persian Wars by Herodotus. Retrieved 03 06, 14, from Meadans: http://www.meandans.posc.mu.edu/tsct/ah/herodotus…

    • 3419 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Transformational leadership is a form of leadership in which relationships are organized around a collective purpose in ways that transform, motivate, and enhance the actions and ethical aspirations of followers (Burns1978).…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Transformational Leaders

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The theory was developed to address organizational success by developing effective leadership characteristics. The function of a transformational leader is to inspire others, build trust and promote and optimistic, positive and encouraging outlook. Unlike Richardson, Smith believed that transformational leaders should exhibit four important characteristics; being an effective communicator, possessing inspirational traits, having trustworthy character and promoting teamwork. These characteristics are vital for job satisfaction and retention. Lockhart (2015) adds that transformational leadership is a method of managing individuals in a diverse and enhancing environment that enables team members to feel…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays