Preview

Was Alexander The Great Really A Good Ruler?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
639 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Alexander The Great Really A Good Ruler?
In 15 years of fighting, Alexander the Great never lost a battle. Although he did some evil things because his personality and arrogance got the best of him, he made some good decisions for the sake of his empire. Alexander the Great was truly a great leader. He ruled his empire under some pretty good tactics and a great government. So, was he truly a great ruler? As the background information states, his parents were royalty, giving him special privileges. His parents made the decision to have him be taught like a Spartan warrior. This give him the ability to think like a military leader. This would come in handy, for later in his life he would have to develop strategies and tactics in minutes. He was taught by many smart teachers, who gave him knowledge of things he could use in the future. He thought highly of himself, and he grew to believe that he was a god. His father was assassinated in 336 BC, and left the kingdom to Alexander. Before his death, his father declared war on Persia. …show more content…

He conquered many kingdoms and lands controlled by Persia. Persian King Darius was killed in the war, and Alexander replaced him on the throne, which spread his empire even farther. He still wasn't satisfied with the amount of land he had, so he pushed even farther eastward into unknown lands. When they reached the Hydaspes River, Porus, a prince, came up with the tactic to use elephants to fight, according to author Lucius Flavius Arrianus. Alexander had to figure out how to get past them. He sent his men in different directions to throw off Porus’s army. As Peter Green wrote, Alexander marched down the coast of the Mediterranean, and various cities gave up without a fight. They came to a city named Tyre, which held them off for seven months. Alexander’s arrogance got the best of him and he killed 2,000 men. He sold 30,000 survivors into

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Alexander was tempted to chase after Darius, but with his camp being raided and Parmenion surrounded, Alexander ordered his troops back. He then aided to Parmenion and slaughtered the Persians who were coming back from raiding his camp (“Battle of Gaugamela”). With exemplary leading, strategic planning, and patience, Alexander had earned one of the most decisive and stunning victories…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was born into the royal family of Macedonia in 356 BC to King Philip and Queen Olympia. King Philip was absent most of his life and the prince grew to resent him, and at age 13 the King assigned the famous philosopher, Aristotle, to teach him art, philosophy, poetry, drama, science and politics. Aristotle also taught him the works of Homer, and Alexander was greatly inspired by the warrior Achilles.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All throughout school teachers have taught students that Alexander The Great was indeed great but, is this really true? He did conquer much land and spread greek culture throughout Europe but not many people know what he did to his men in order to do this. One way that he torched his men to get what he wants is in Document D when the man went through all that work to get him his hat back after it falling into the water than killed him. He did this because in order to get the hat back without getting wet he would have to place it on his head. Since he placed in on his head he had to get it cut off because it says “he should not allow the head that had worn the royal head band to be safe” (Document D). He did this to show the rest of his men…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example of an achievement will be establishing an empire and find the best way to improve it which was what Herod the great did to earn his title. He initiated construction at Jerusalem, Jericho, and Caesarea of theaters, amphitheaters, and hippodromes . Alexander's actions may have made significant changes to the world back then and today, but his goals were not too different from Hitler's which was to conquer the world. Hitler today was not respected by anyone and definitely not today. Although he killed many people in a much more cruel way than Alexander, but their purpose was similar, to dominate land. It is not worth the lives he had killed. It was not only the army of who he was fighting against that was killed and injured, more than half of Alexander's army died at the journey through the desert of Gedrosia. No one considers a murderer "great". Alexander sympathizes for those people that he killed? It does not mention anywhere that Alexander did anything in memory those people and not even his own people that were killed. Many people say it was because of him uniting all those cities that initiated development in Europe. It is true that after the unification, economical and cultural development did boast. Alexander should…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the great was hailed by many historians as one of the greatest kings of his time. Because of his greatness he earned the title of alexander the great. I believe, that with all of the things that Alexander did for the Greek empire, he definitely deserves this title. He was able to acquire much more land, he stopped the largest rebellion in greek history, and, under his rule, great cities were created that mixed many cultures to create great cities. Based upon all of the gathered evidence, I think that his title is well deserved.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great’s ability to maintain effective organizational systems and structure and seamlessly communicate and execute strategies were the catalysts of his defeat of Darius’ larger army (Nassar, n.d.). To begin with, Alexander rigorously trained and prepared his troops to fight prior to an actual battle, which enabled him to maintain a small, agile, highly disciplined, and efficient army (History.com, 2009). Furthermore, Alexander’s appointment of commanders to each unit enhanced real time communication and facilitated coordinated disbanding of phalanxes to allow Darius’ cavalry units to pass through the phalanx, where they were attacked by Alexander’s infantry units (Wasson, 2014). Therefore, attacking Darius’s left flank, in conjunction…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was, in many ways, an amazing ruler. He was not afraid to take a chance on someone or something that everyone else had given up on, and he was prepared to risk his safety to help his men. Alexander also proved to his men that he was strong and that he was prepared to die for his cause.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander sent piece of his armed force on board 150 boats, under the charge of NEARCHUS, on an undertaking westward along the bank of the Arabian Sea the extent that the mouths of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers at the leader of the Persian Gulf. He headed whatever is left of his armed force through the desert district of southern Baluchistan again to the Mesopotamian urban communities of Susa and Babylon. The overland excursion was laden with hardship; it is evaluated that Alexander lost a huge number of his men to thirst. Additionally, a great many the camp adherents were suffocated in desert blaze…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It was at this point when Alexanders troops refused to go on due to the monsoon season and fear of an unknown Indian kingdom (Lane Fox, p. 231, para. 1). Although Alexander’s accomplishments were extraordinary and unmatched to this day, he had greater aspirations to continue his conquest and if it were not for his death he may have been capable of much…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On for at least decade. He went on conquest of Asia Minor Alexander had broken the power the…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the winter of 334, he began the invasion of Asia Minor(Wilbank 2015). The first battle of the Persian conquest was along the Granicus river. Although the Persians greatly outnumbered the Macedonian army, Alexander’s military expertise learned in the earlier Greek conflicts would be very useful in this battle, and the Macedonian army won handily, forcing King Darius to flee. The two armies would later clash again at Issus, where once again, Alexander’s military formations would prove too much for the Persians..(Alexander The Great, n. d.) Due to the Persian’s great success and wealth, Alexander would be able to use his newly acquired lands to fuel more foreign conquest. In November of 332, Alexander took his army South to Egypt. However, the Egyptians showed no resistance to Alexander’s army, and surrendered. Alexander was crowned Pharaoh, and with Egypt under his control, Alexander had conquered most of the eastern Mediterranean coast. The Macedonian army now advanced into Mesopotamia, with a focus on Babylon. Alexander’s army was met with an opposition from Mazaeus, the Persian governor of Babylon. Once again, the Macedonians decisively won, and the city of Babylon was conquered. After taking Babylon, Alexander and the Macedonian’s continued taking small parts of Persia. In one of these battles, King Darius was stabbed and wounded.(Walbank, n. d.) With the Persian king deceased, there…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The general assumption of Alexander the Great is that he was a conqueror and was in charge of the destruction of the Persian Empire. This leader and achiever succeeded in plenty other aspects to create the conqueror he became over time. Thus, Alexander the Great was an average youthful child who was born in Pella, Macedonia where he later became emperor. The support from other scholars has helped prove the importance of him and his conquests.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander however could not do this alone in fact he had a very elite army of 37,000 soldiers when he set out, including Greek and Macedonian troops. Alexander first went to Asia Minor to free it’s Greek people from Persian rule. He swept through Asia Minor making King Darius’ army flee for their lives. After that Alexander marched to Tyre and crucified 2,000 men to send a message to King Darius that he is no man, he was a god.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was completely unstoppable. He conquered four countries in his lifetime, and a bunch of land! And it is said, that if his own men hadn’t of said no to going any farther, he would have conquered all of Europe and Asia. He conquered the Thebans while holding off a rebellion. He conquered the Egyptians peacefully. He conquered Persia and India brilliantly also. There is no doubt that Alexander was great. He is called, Alexander “The Great”.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a youth Alexander set out with his army to Egypt with a confidence that he could do almost anything. After conquering Egypt he describes himself as being part god, to the dimay of some Greeks. He even refuses Darius’ offer for Alexander to marry his daughter, because he says he does not need his permission to marry Darius’ daughter. This part of Alexander’s life serves to show his “young and stupid” phase, where is extremely cocky, acting as if he could take over the entire world if he wanted to, even though he does see most of the world in terms of what people during Alexander’s time thought the world was. Although Alexander does become more wise to the ways of the world as he ages, he never really sheds his over-confidence until right before his death.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays