Preview

Was Dunkirk A Moral Victory Or Military Disaster?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
962 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Dunkirk A Moral Victory Or Military Disaster?
Was Dunkirk a moral victory or a military disaster? Firstly, let’s set the scene for this event. Neville Chamberlain had declared war on the Nazis eight months ago and currently there was a stalemate between both sides called the “Phoney War.” On May 10, the Germans launched a blitzkrieg attack on the Netherlands and Belgium. By May 15, they had already broken through the French defenses and started to head straight for the English Channel. A week later, German forces had the British Expeditionary Force and other allied troops surrounded at the port of Dunkirk in France. The troops at Dunkirk looked doomed, but surprisingly the German troops were given a halt order, giving the British troops a bit of breathing space. The halt order had given …show more content…
However, the civilian appeal to join the cause was a success and they brought home 180 troops in three days. When Operation Dynamo ended 338,226 soldiers had escaped from Dunkirk. Soldiers were hailed as heroes when they got home. The soldiers at Dunkirk had endured hellish conditions. They were starving, exhausted, and had endured fierce bombardments of bullets and bombs. The sight of boats coming to shore was probably a sight they had been yearning to see for days. “'I've got to survive, I must survive to fight on in this war,” is what James Bradley,a soldier who escaped at Dunkirk, was muttering himself when he saw Dunkirk in a blazing mass of flames. James Bradley had been trained to a machine gunner in WWII.”We were told that we'll have to stand and fight to the last here. But then we were told, a second time, 'We've got to get out of here, we've got to save the regiment - or what's left of the regiment.” This account of one soldier’s time at Dunkirk is only example of the conditions, and I can’t even imagine the types of conditions the other soldiers went …show more content…
Was it really a military disaster? Dunkirk was a success, morally. British soldiers(B.E.F)and any allied soldiers were stuck at Dunkirk. The amount of soldiers that did end up escaping exceeded the estimate that Winston Churchill believed would escape. Poor planning and strategizing had left the British Expeditionary Force and allied soldiers in a desperate situation, they were able to get out of it. The soldiers were hailed as heroes when they returned, but not all the soldiers were rescued from Dunkirk. What happened to the soldiers left behind? Germans captured 40,000 French soldiers and 40,000 British soldiers who were left behind at Dunkirk. The story of the forgotten soldiers are often overlooked but until the the end of the war in 1945, forgotten soldiers were largely mistreated at the war camps. The POWs were denied food and medical treatments and were forced to drink ditch water and were given repulsive food. The question can be debated, whether Dunkirk was a success or a fail. I believe Dunkirk can be considered a success. The British soldiers were in a sticky situation and fighting back wouldn’t be effective at that moment. If you’re looking at it from another perspective, you could say it was a military fail, but I believe the first priority is always keeping people

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The allies lost a substantial amount of fighters, a total of 3,367 casualties which included 1,946 that were taken in as prisoner and 907 Canadians killed, an extraordinary casualty rate of 68%, only in the matter of 9 hours hours that the battle lasted for, In addition to that, 106 RAF planes and 81 airmen unfortunately never made to the end, compared to the Luftwaffe who did not come nearly as close, losing around 46 aircraft and 591 Germans. The commanding officers who mapped out the raid in Dieppe didn’t expect them to suffer as poorly as they did. But what were some of the reasons behind all this mass destruction? For the most part, they were ultimately let down by poor planning and poor intelligence. They failed to operate their equipment especially when it came to the tanks, which tumbled due to the rocky nature of it. There were also no air support or naval gunfire cover at all. Canadian troops paid the price of it, though they fought valiantly and made the Germans pay for every inch of the…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evacuation Dunkirk is though as the turning point of World War II. When all hope was lost they pulled together and beat the stacked odds. It gave new hope for the alleys and kept them in the war. From the Royal air force to the lone fishermen every one contributed. Along with the men in the rear fighting off the Germens, so there buddies could pack onto the hundreds of boats.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dieppe Raid Research Paper

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The raid on Dieppe in World War Two was a disaster and woefully resulted in the loss of many lives, but why? The planning of the raid was incomplete and lacked many important factors. The intelligence that the Allied Forces had gained to plan the raid on Dieppe was incorrect or incomplete. There were no lessons learned at Dieppe that were not already known or could have been learned without the raid. The Dieppe Raid was highly flawed and this was the fault of the planners of the raid.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Dunkirk

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I agree with the quotation above that “Dunkirk was a miracle of deliverance” because of the overwhelming evidence of the pros of the operation (codenamed Operation Dynamo). The first pro of the evacuation was that 338,226 soldiers…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The allies even though they were surrounded by the German army still fought back and resisted even after the Belgian army surrendered (May 28). The Germans bombed and destroyed most of Dunkirk and its surrounding areas as they were kept a distance by the allies who had set a perimeter that slightly kept falling back until they got to Dunkirk where they were evacuated. Many allied troops died keeping the Germans out of Dunkirk but all these sacrifices helped save the life of approximately 338,000 men all these troops were saved in the span of 11 days, the Germans may have taken over Dunkirk but many allied troops were able to live another day and the evacuation also saved the British many soldiers who were able to fight another day. The battle of Dunkirk was important in WW2 because had the Germans sealed off and killed all those troops that were evacuated the whole momentum of the western front war would have gone to Germany. The Dunkirk evacuations moralized the British army as they didn’t suffer major defeat and were able to save the life’s of a lot of men. Had Germany killed all those men the outcome of the war on the…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The first bombs, the first explosion, burst into our hearts.” (Remarque 88) This is what the soldiers felt like in Erich Maria Remarque novel, All Quiet on the Western Front, Paul Baumer, a young man serving in the German army during World War One, is constantly being faced with the horrible and terrifying aspects of war. From seeing, his fellow soldiers lying dead on the battle field, to learning how to survive on the western front of the war. With his rifle by his side and his comrade’s right next to him, he knew what his job was to do in the war and that was to serve his country. Although Paul fought for his country in the War, Corrie Ten Boom a member of the Dutch reformed church was faced with the horrific scenes…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The attack on D-Day, the invasion of Normandy, France, was very important in the Allied war effort. It allowed the Allies to open a war front in Western Europe so that Adolf Hitler, the tyrannical leader of Nazi Germany, would have to redirect armed troops away from the fight in the Eastern Front against the Russians to the Western Front. Ambrose highlighted some rather well analyzed and calculated possibilities that could have been a product of a failure on D-Day. Ambrose’s given points are logically reasonable and could have been a true history if all the key factors that fell perfectly together to create the successful attack were to have been slightly off, causing the attack to fail. At the beginning of the article, Ambrose wrote about the weather and how much it affected the ability for the Allied forces to invade into Normandy successfully.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Churchill wanted to impress Roosevelt by attacking the French Fleet, then he would not have put so much effort into getting the fleet from France. He would have also disregarded the Franco-German Armistice and Article VIII of the agreement. Nevertheless, Churchill did not follow this course of action, which makes it clear that his main priority from the beginning was to keep the French Fleet away from Germany. This is not to say that Churchill did not want to impress Roosevelt and did not use Operation Catapult as an opportunity to do it. He did. Churchill had attempted to persuade the U.S. to enter the war as early as May of 1940.52 Both U.S. assistance and stopping Germany from potentially seizing the fleet were vital to Britain remaining…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great War Dbq Essay

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Source 3 depicts the German’s confidence during the beginning of the Great War. The line “French and Russian they matter not” shows that Germany felt assured of its victory over them to the point that these two countries do not pose a threat and thus, do not matter. The customary toast of “to the day” also illustrates the confidence that the Germans had for defeating Britain. Yet, later in the war, the German soldiers’ confidence changed to a sense of despair. In evidence source 7, Erich Maria Remarque writes “Every man here knows that we are losing the war. Not much is said about it, we are falling back…” and emphasizes on the helpless situation with how the Germans starved, had few weapons left, did not have adequate soldiers in the new…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winston Churchill is often considered one of Great Britain’s most important and effective leaders during World War 2. There are many reasons for this. Even though Churchill had remained outside of government for a period of time, he made speeches warning of Germany’s growing power. He also spoke out openly against Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, plan’s for appeasement with Nazi Germany. However, when Nazi Germany attacked Poland the public saw that Churchill knew this was going to happen. Just two days after the attack on Poland Churchill was once again made First Lord of the Admiralty. When Nazi Germany attacked France it was time for a new leader. Appeasement had not worked and on the same day that Chamberlain resigned King George VI asked Churchill to become the new Prime Minister. Churchill was what Britain needed, he was a strong speaker and did whatever it took to get his side to win whatever the matter. Three days after becoming Prime Minister he delivered one of his most famous speeches titled, “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat.” This speech along with many others is what provided Britain with the morale boost they…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this following essay I will be discussing the different views and military tactics used for evacuating both French and English soldiers from Dunkirk. I hope to show both positive and negative views using sources and other sorts of information such as, newspaper articles and speeches. By using these I can portray a comparison in which is fair for both opinions but also that each source is reliable so both sides of the argument will be compared reasonably. I will be explaining in tremendous detail and also adding a conclusion about my opinion on this World War 2 mystery.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dunkirk

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. At 5:30 a.m. on May 10, 1940, Nazi Germany began a massive attack against Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, and France. Defending those countries were soldiers of the British Expeditionary Force along with the French, Belgian, and Dutch armies. The Germans relied on an aggressive battle plan, utilizing modern communications such as radio to direct troops in the field. The Allies, for their part, assumed a defensive posture, just as they had done at the start of World War I. As a result, the German Blitzkrieg (lightning attack) caught the Allies off-guard. German Panzer tanks staged a surprise attack, The "Miracle at Dunkirk" occurred next as 338,000 British and French soldiers were hurriedly evacuated from the coastline by Royal Navy ships on civilian boats of every shape and size.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The troops had little food, lick grass for water, had to bear the sight of other’s deaths, as well as live under the thought that they could die at any moment. The people who lived through this of often scarred for life, mentally and physically and even being depressed.…

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    D-Day/Battle of Normandy

    • 4950 Words
    • 20 Pages

    The Americans were early and persistent advocates of a direct strategy - a cross-Channel attack that would first destroy German military power in the West, then drive deep into the heart of industrial Germany to end the war. The British, on the other hand, sobered by their disastrous experiences at Dunkirk and Dieppe, preferred to stage a number of small-scale attacks around the perimeter of fortress Europe. They thereby hoped to weaken German defenses before leaping precipitously across the Channel into the teeth of the still powerful Wehrmacht. The British simply could not afford the staggering losses entailed in a frontal assault on the northwest coast of Europe. "Memories of the Somme and Passchendaele," wrote Sir Winston Churchill years later, "were not to be blotted out by time or reflection." British Lieutenant General Sir Frederick Morgan, Chief of Staff to the Supreme Allied Commander (COSSAC), put it more bluntly in his memoirs: "Certain British authorities instinctively recoiled from the whole affair, as well they might, for fear of the butcher bill." It is not surprising, then, that the harder the Americans pressed in 1942 and 1943 for a firm commitment on a cross-Channel attack, the more the British seemed to vacillate.…

    • 4950 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mission Command

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages

    With German forces on the run following the Allied success at Normandy and the breakout and pursuit across France, Allied forces were staged to enter Germany in late summer 1944. Both Field Marshal Montgomery and General Bradley clamored to be given the priority of effort. General Eisenhower chose Montgomery’s Operation MARKET GARDEN as the plan for action. It called for airborne forces to open the route for a ground force to move more than sixty miles up a single road, ending up north of the Rhine River near Arnhem, Netherlands. By accomplishing this task, the German Ruhr industrial heartland would be within easy grasp. But the operation failed. The ground force did not make it to the last bridge; it was six more months before Allied forces crossed the Lower Rhine River near Arnhem. Between 17 and 26 September 1944, there were 17,000 Allied casualties including eighty percent of the 1st Airborne Division (UK). The historical evidence overwhelmingly shows that the British 1st Airborne Division lost the Battle of Arnhem because of poor planning. This paper will prove the failure of The Battle of Arnhem was not solely the fault of MG Roy Urquhart. Although this was his first command of such a division (being an "outsider") could he have not completed his wartime mission any better despite having inexperienced leaders planning airborne operations, bad intelligence, allowing the Air Force to plan the DZs based off what was best for the air movement plan and poor execution. This paper examines MG Urquhart, the commander of 1st Airborne Division (UK).…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays