On 4 June 1913, Emily Wilding Davison attended the Epsom Derby. As the race was being run, she ran out on to the track and the horse owned by King George V, Anmer, collided with her and she fell to the ground, whereupon she was trampled by its hooves as it too fell. Meanwhile, the jockey, Herbert Jones, was thrown but had his foot caught in the stirrup. The horse did a somersault, got up, and resumed running the race, dragging the unconscious Jones along for a distance before his foot came loose. Bystanders unsuccessfully attempted to revive both Davison and Jones before the pair was carried off by ambulances. Emily Davison’s purpose was unclear and it is unknown whether this was deliberate suicide or just a mere accident.
There are many factors that support that Emily Davison had committed suicide. Emily was known as a person who supported the idea for killing oneself for a cause and called it glorious; she thought that anything was right if it was for a cause. This means that this incident could have been a suicide as this could be a “glorious” act for a cause, which is the women’s rights cause. Other factors that supported the idea of this being a suicide was that Emily Davison had attempted suicide, for her cause, before. This was by throwing herself into wire netting, during prison and also, throwing herself off the top of stairs; these turned out to be unsuccessful and the Derby event could have been another attempt, only, that time, it was successful. This idea was also supported as people had known Emily as a person who did strange and crazy things to draw attention to herself, one of her close friends had also said that Emily had said she would give up her life for the Suffragette cause. Also, because she was a well-known Suffragette, this event would have been good propaganda. The day before the Derby, Emily had hinted that she was going to do “something” at the Derby horserace. This implies that Emily had planned to do something special at the horse race but it doesn’t exactly mean that she planned to commit suicide. Emily was also not the type to go to horse races and it must have meant that she went to this horse race for a certain reason. Her behaviour on the day was calm to one of her acquaintance but to the man standing next to her, she seemed nervous. This doesn’t confirm that it was suicide as she would have been a little bit more confident in what she was doing if it as suicide, but it could be that maybe she was nervous about whether it was going to go the way she planned it to. When she got hit by the horse, someone raised the Suffragette flag which indicates that maybe this was planned because it couldn’t have been just an coincidence that some had been carrying a Suffragette poster to a horse race. She also had the Suffragette colours sewn into her coat which suggests that it was suicide as it probably meant she wanted people to know that she had died for the Suffragette issue.
Although there were many factors as to why Emily Davison’s death was a suicidal death, there are also many others that suggest the opposite - that it was an accidental death. Although she might have hinted that she would do “something” at the Derby the day before at the Summer Suffragette fair, it didn’t mean that she was planning suicide. When she was running towards the horse, she had had her hands raised above her head, as if she had wanted to put something on the King’s horse. This is a sensible prediction as it is obvious that advertising the Suffragette cause on the King’s horse would be excellent propaganda. It was also said that she had tried grabbing the horse’s reins so that she could display the Suffragette flag on the horse, which also backs up this theory. This means that she had only merely tried to tag something on the horse, and that she had no actual intention of actually dying. Another reason to why Emily’s death was accidental that is linked to the previous was that she was seen handing out leaflets, promoting her cause. Many people had predicted that she had thought that all of the horses had already passed and she was only trying to cross the track to get to the other side of it. This could be possible as since Emily was not the type for horse races, she might have not had known how fast horses can gallop and underestimated the time it would take the king’s horse to pass and therefore got hit by it. The jockey at the horse race, Steve Donaghue and acing historian, John Tyrell had found the idea of picking out a specific horse to be ridiculous as they were travelling from as fast as 40 miles per hour. There were also many other factors that suggested the death of Emily Davison was accidental. One was that and she had said that she would protest at the race without any tragedy, which includes death and she had also promised that she would attend the Suffragette fair, which was the 5th June, the day after race. To support this idea, when she had been searched after being hit, in her hand bag was a return ticket to London, where she lived. This suggests that she intended to go back home and had no intention to die. It was also said that if she were to commit suicide, she would have left a farewell message to her mother, who she had loved very much. As she had not left a message, this also suggests that she was not planning to commit suicide.
I think that it might have been an accidental death, although I am still quite sceptical about it. This is because there are many valid reasons for the death being a suicide like she had tried committing suicide earlier on in her life and she had also hinted doing “something” at the Derby. But these reasons were contradicted with other factors. She had tried committing suicide earlier and had said she would give up her life for the Suffragettes but since no one had known her true thoughts and feelings that day, it is unknown if she had wanted to kill herself. Also, she had hinted to do “something”, but that doesn’t necessarily mean she wanted to commit suicide, she may have wanted to put something on the horse, as others had predicted. This was also backed up with the fact that she had said she would protest without tragedy. Also, there were other significant factors such as the return ticket, the promise of being at the fair the day after and the absence of the farewell letter to her mother. Overall, I predict that her death was most likely to be accidental.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
“Suffragettes,” “property,” and “non-persons.” Such suggested as the British North America Act specifying that all women were not seen as people in the eyes of the British law. Women were unqualified to vote, own land, and run an office since women were persons in “matters of pains and penalties, but not in matters of rights and privileges” (Mitchell 29) according to the BNA Act. Due to the lack of government, this got the attention of five women activists around Canada who recognized the inequality between…
- 1152 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Emily Davison was a woman who fought for woman's suffrage in the late 1800s and early 1900s. She died on the 8th of June, 1913 after she ran in front of King George V's horse Anmer at the Epsom Derby on 4 June 1913. Some people believe that this event caused a major breakthrough in later women's suffrage.…
- 564 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Miss Emily Grierson, the main character in A Rose For Emily, was so obviously insane that the main question is not if she is insane, but how. Of all the factors that should be taken into account and all the various manifestations of insanity she could have presented, there are some particular aspects of her behavior hold more certainty than others. The fact that nearly all of her life was lived privately, unviewed by anyone who could speak of it, the only knowledge of her behavior comes from her rare interactions with the townspeople of Jefferson. Having lived with only a corpse for company for more than forty years, almost all of her behaviors that were seen by the public were erratic, at the least. With insanity exhibited by her great aunt…
- 1032 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Miss Emily is first explained as a nice, sweet, and normal woman, though that all changed as her life went on. The death of her father was the flame that ignited all of this weirdness of Emily. After her father died, Miss Emily did not go out much probably because of grief over the loss of her father. “Because her father is the only man with whom she has had a close relationship, she denies his death and keeps his corpse in her house until she breaks down three days later when the doctors insist she let them take the body” (A1). This statement demonstrates her inability to let go of lost ones.…
- 609 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In today’s society, self harm has become a taboo subject that we often ignore or shun people for. By closely analyzing Michael Thomas Ford’s Suicide notes, Gillian Flynn’s Sharp Objects, Cheryl Rainfield’s Scars and Patricia McCormick’s Cut, I have discovered that this sensitive subject, although rarely talked about, happens more than we think. In Michael Thomas Ford’s Suicide notes, Jeff, The main character struggles with the idea that he has to hide his sexuality just to be accepted and how he copes with it. When Jeff attempts suicide, after self harming for so many years, he can't handle all the secrets that he’s been hiding.…
- 1231 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
An Inspector Calls is a three-act drama, which takes place on a single night in 1912, and focuses on the Birling family, who live in a wealthy but not particulary homely house in Brumley. The story begins when the mysterious Inspector Goole calls unexpectedly on the prosperous Birling family. The idea of the play, and particularly the role of the inspector, is to try to bring the Birling family to understand that they have a moral responsibility for the death of Eva Smith, if not a legal one. In Act Three, the Inspector tells the Birling family: “The girl killed herself and died a horrible death. But each of you helped to kill her. Remember that. Never forget it.” But who was really the most to blame for her death? I believe that they all had their own part to play in her death but am not entirely sure if anyone has more blame than another. So in turn I will go through each of the characters and study their role in the death and hopefully come to some conclusion as to who is the most to blame.…
- 2527 Words
- 11 Pages
Better Essays -
While many of the city members hardly see Emily, they are taking an interest in her recent adventure to the market. This is atypical, as Emily normally has her slave Tobe go to the market for her. She is taking a step out her home to get the one thing that brings the town to their wits. Emily is making headway to purchase Arsenic, rat poisoning, the best they have in town. Arbitrarily enough, the city assumes Emily will commit suicide due to her unwed life and not barring children. Most people her age, in the 30’s, have both. So, they support their illusion of committing suicide, not knowing the true use of the product. Due to Emily’s adventure, their vigilance increases. It’s noted that Emily’s family has a history of suicide. Remarkably, the city assumes that she is crazy and that her “craziness is possibly inherited”(456) from her late aunt Lady…
- 2036 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
Emily Davison may be considered a peaceful protester. Evidence to support this is that found on her person was a return ticket from which we can infer that Ms Davison didn’t want to kill herself and instead she…
- 1372 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Emily’s obsessive actions dominate her choices as can be seen when she buys the poison. “She was over thirty then, still a slight woman, though thinner than usual, with cold, haughty black eyes in a face the flesh of which was strained across the temples and about the eye sockets as you imagine a lighthouse-keeper's face ought to look.” (Faulkner 1071) Emily had the life sucked out of her by her father and empty relationship with Homer. She is described in the same way that you would describe the Grim Reaper, bringing death to those around her. William Faulkner wrote many stories telling the tales of the same town and people as found in “A Rose for Emily”. In each story the lives of those in this town decay around them, falling apart as more Northerners migrate to the South. But as the death of Homer illuminates, it is more than the North that will fail if the tumult in the nation continues. Homer and Emily’s relationship complexity promises a metaphorical death of the Southern ideals. Just as Emily had lost all of her moral standard by killing Homer, the South would lose itself in the strife involving the other side of the country. Faulkner displays a grim future for the nation if willingness for peace cannot be committed to and…
- 1079 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Emily Grierson is a mentally incapable woman who has abandonment issues. She killed the man so he could they could be with each other for all time. The entire time that Homer Barron was dead on Miss Emily’s bed she slept next to him. This shows that she is crazy and will do anything to preserve the ones that she lover because she cannot let go of the past and accept that Homer will leave…
- 486 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
She is not willing to sacrifice herself for her children. The narrator says to the teacher that “[Emily] is a child of her age, of depression, of war, of fear” (55). We can see…
- 1023 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The story begins by the new governor of Jefferson sending a deputation to Emily's home to collect her taxes; but, Emily refuses by saying "See Colonel Sartoris . . . I have no taxes in Jefferson" (178). This is true because the ex-Governor of Jefferson had remitted her taxes after her father's death. Emily was desperate for companionship and hoped to marry soon. When Emily's last chance for matrimony disappears, she kills him and sleeps with the decaying body for days. She eventually turns into a pariah, and the townspeople report hardly seeing her at all. Undoubtedly, her father death causes her the greatest amount of turmoil. She goes so far as to deny the death of her father to herself and to the many people who had come to give her condolences on the day after his death.…
- 1002 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
William Faulkner’s persona in “A Rose for Emily” speaks of the dangers of psychological issues; psychological issues that affect every aspect of life for Emily Grierson. In all actuality, Emily Grierson suffers from anxiety, grief, and psychotic symptoms- this prognosis is supported by Miss Emily Grierson’s sleeping with Homer Baron, a corpse. The theme, or central message, in William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily,” is that people suffer from psychological and psychotic issues but some go undiagnosed and untreated.…
- 790 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
She remained single up to his death not because she chose to, but, due to the fact that her father chased away all the men who tried to court her. (Pp. 18) He basically locked her away from any experience with love. As a result, her father ended up being the only person in her life that she would love and care for until she met Homer Barron. Emily's loneliness throughout her life was the cause of her inability to let go the one she loves. For instance, her father was the only person she had, so when he died, she denied his death so she could hang on to him. Thus, the reason why Emily killed Homer Barron was to keep him in her life, dead or alive, because he was the only person she had…
- 705 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I strongly believe Emily Davison did intend to kill herself on the Derby of June 1913. Many labelled Emily Wilding Davison as a suicidal fanatic but I think not. I feel as if the plan been contemplated by herself and kept secretive, even from her fellow suffragettes. We are aware of this as Sylvia Pankhurst wrote in 1930 (more than 26 years after the Derby had taken place) Emily Davison was an intelligent and qualified woman who was a teacher before joining the WSPU, and I do not think that her intelligence faltered in this scheme. Many in opposition of the Suffragettes would use the fact that she was an honoured and privileged woman and teacher who would never commit such a deed, hence causing more criticism towards the Suffragettes and advertise that they were merely a group of merely mentally unstable women. But Emily Davison had her strategies. She was prepared to die for the cause of the WSPU, to show that in spite of her qualifications and education she was a women and she wanted women to have the vote-not that she was mentally unstable. Her deed spoke louder than any words could, just as the Suffragtte Newspaper quoted: “More eloquent than all words of all speeches could be”. Many believe that it was coincidental that she collided with Anmer (the King’s horse) but I feel as if she had strategically planned to position herself in front of Anmer as a representation of the King’s treatment towards the women of this country-practically that he walks all over them. In terms of the plan, I think she kept her plans secretive so nobody would be definite of her motives and there would be long debates in history regarding what her intentions were- so her act would be known regardless of what they thought she intended to do. They would know her, the Suffragette Emily Wilding Davison. And they would know of the Suffragettes. It is speculated that Emily intended to pin the prime colours of the Suffragette movement onto the King’s horse,…
- 523 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays