Preview

Was Louis Riel a Hero or Tyrant?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Louis Riel a Hero or Tyrant?
Louis Riel- Hero or Tyrant* Many people till today think that Louis Riel was not guilty and that his sentence was just an easy way for the Canadian government to get him out of their way. Louis Riel was the leader of the Métis during the Red River Rebellion and the Northwest Rebellion. He was hanged on November 16, 1885 for treason, but was he a real villain? Louis Riel is undoubtedly a national hero because he stood up for Métis rights. In my opinion Louis Riel was a hero in many ways. After the rebellions Riel could be called a villain because he challenged the government and wrongly viewed their ideas, led rebellions against the government and Ran away to the US after he killed Scott, but if people looked at it a little closer they would see that Riel was pushed to act the way he did. Before the Red River rebellion the level of tension was increasing in the red river settlement due to the arrival and actions of the surveyors and land speculators. Riel disapproved of the

actions, so he organized bands of Métis to confront them. He later formed the Métis national committee to fight for Métis concerns about their land. He then occupied Fort Garry. That is what triggered the Red River Rebellion. Riel wanted to make sure that his people would retain their rights and traditions. In order to do so Riel set up a provisional government. Angered by recent events the Métis drew up a list of rights. Riel later led a party of armed Métis to Shultz home and took members of the Canadian party to Fort Garry. Thomas Scott was executed by a Métis firing squad because he went against the provisional government. Throughout and after this rebellion there were many terrible results. Riel got banished by the Canadian government for five years. The members of the provisional government that Riel set up were granted amnesty. Thomas Scott was executed which made the government see Riel as a felon. Riel was wanted by the government. Riel feared his life so he ran

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The intellectual movement known as the Enlightenment most deeply influenced what emerging class in Europe? P.545…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people believe that louis Riel was a traitor, but other may say otherwise. For an example he saved his people of Red River from losing all of their land, fought for his rights, and was there when his people were in need of him the most. A hero is someone who fights for the right cause and that's exactly, what Louis Riel did. One example of his heroism acts, were that when the Canadian Government sent surveyors to mark the land for their railway, This had cut of the meti land where they had farmed for generations. When the surveyors came across Louis cousins farm, he stopped them from coming any further.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Thomas Jefferson was a hero because he wrote the declaration of Independence and made the Louisiana Purchase which doubled the size of the United States but he was a hypocrite because tried to make slavery illegal while owning 500 slaves.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did John Brown's Raid

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Between the years 1859 and 1863 John Brown’s rain on the Federal Armory at Harpers Ferry made him a hero in the North and a villain in the South. Brown’s raid was over in about 2 days. He wanted to start an armed slave revolt by seizing the Federal Armory. John Brown was hung for treason because of his actions. Brown’s plan was not to conduct a sudden raid and then escape to the mountains. Rather, his plan was to use those rifles and pikes he captured at the arsenal, in addition to those he brought along, to arm rebellious slaves with the aim of striking terror to the slaveholders in Virginia.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He was discharged in 1876. Riel became an American citizen in 1883, and in June of the following year he would be called upon in favour of returning to Canada. When Riel returned to St. Laurent he began recruiting drafting Metis and Native people from nearby reserves after a plea and petition to Ottawa failed (Stanley). This band of arms did eventually defeat a small force of mounted police sent west by the government. Fighting after this would last all but two months, known as the North-West Rebellion. Following defeat, Riel surrendered to General Middleton and would be taken to court for treason. His lawyers attempted defences of insanity, which Riel rejected, as he believed the defence of the Metis people was his duty (Manitoba Historical Society). Riel was convicted of treason for leading rebellions against Canada, and was sentenced to hanging November 16, 1885 (Rabson).…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Lambton, Earl of Durham, was appointed Governor in Chief of the Canadas, sent to investigate the rebellions in Upper and Lower Canada in the spring of 1838. Both rebellions had occurred in the previous year of 1837, and were led by Louis-Joseph Papineau (Lower Canada Rebellion) and William Lyon Mackenzie (Upper Canada Rebellion). Britain realizing that change was in order to be able to successfully administer the colonies, delegated Durham with finding the source of the conflict that had led to the revolt. He instead found "two nations warring within the bosom of a single state". Durham first travelled to the United States, so that the rebels who had been operating from the northern states would not have their support any further. Instead of giving the penalty of death to rebels, his treatment of the rebels was very forgiving, absolving many of them of their crimes.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV, also known as Le Gran Monarque and the Sun God, was not indeed such a good king for France. The reign of Louis XIV was hurtful in many ways to France and its people. First of all, Louis XIV financially destroyed France by doing things that he thought would help but just hurt France in the long run. Louis was constantly at war with another country, which not only hurt France financially, because wars were very expensive during that time, but it also depleted France¡¯s once massive army. He also persecuted the Huguenots and fifty thousand of them fled from France, many of them skilled and very well educated, which also hurt France. It seemed as if the way Louis XIV ruled France was to mainly help himself, and if he did want to make France greater, he failed to do so throughout his reign.…

    • 986 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people saw Louis attempted escape as treacherous. Many radicals supported a petition to remove the King from power as they felt they could no longer trust him. He had turned away from his people and more importantly from the revolution. This confirmed the fears that the King was…

    • 1277 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    World History: Louis Xiv

    • 6350 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Louis XIV, France's Sun King, had the longest reign in European history (1643-1715). During this time he brought absolute monarchy to its height, established a glittering court at Versailles, and fought most of the other European countries in four wars. The early part of his reign (1643-61), while Louis was young, was dominated by the chief minister Cardinal Mazarin. In the middle period (1661-85) Louis reigned personally and innovatively, but the last years of his personal rule (1685-1715) were beset by problems.…

    • 6350 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Napoleon Hero or Villian?

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Napoleon, the great French leader, is often seen as a hero, but if you look closer there is great evidence showing that he is a villain. He seemed to try to improve the country greatly, but really he was just trying to improve his reputation, a very selfish thing to do. For example he adopted a set of laws called the Napoleonic Code. These laws were put in place to give the country a uniform set of rules and eliminate many injustices, but really these limited individual freedoms, something that was greatly stressed before during the early stages of the revolution. It took away the freedom of speech, press, and restored slavery. I don’t believe that Napoleon had the people in mind when he made these laws; I think he wrote them to keep the people under control so he could rule them with less effort and (again) improve his reputation. If a leader rules without any uproar from the citizens then he must be the most brilliant, heroic ruler ever, right? This is exactly what I thought his intentions were. Though a very smart idea this was, it was morally wrong and unjust. In addition Napoleon tried to put other countries against each other. For example in 1803 after he failed the Saint Domingue expedition he sold the Louisiana territory to the United States. His reason was to “punish the British, the sale assures the forever power of the United States, and I have given England a rival that will, sooner or later, humble their pride.” I think he choose to do this so that when all the other powerful countries were fighting he could rise to the occasion and “take over the world.” Not a very heroic thing to do… Finally Napoleon manipulated other people to get what he wanted. In a way he brainwashed them. He created a huge empire that he could barely sustain so he had to threaten the leaders, from countries like Portugal, Prussia, and Sweden, with military actions. This was kind-of cowardly. Clearly…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Napoleon Bonaparte a hero or a tyrant? Did the good of his actions outweigh the bad? Napoleon Bonaparte was a French military leader who rose to power during the French Revolution. He eventually conquered most of Europe and named himself emperor. I believe that Napoleon was a tyrant for a few different reasons. These include that he was egotistical, selfish, and untruthful.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was concern among the French that the émigrés would return at the head of…

    • 4973 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte was inarguably an important figure in the history of France and Europe. However, there has been much controversy over the subject in the past. Would history perceive him as a hero or an enemy of France and the world? Many twentieth-century dictators would later model themselves on Napoleon, more than a hundred years after his death. Napoleon was not the first dictator, so why was he such an important figurehead for future dictators? Some historians may consider that Napoleon was a savior of France, and a brilliant military genius. Others would believe that he was a corrupted tyrant and had betrayed key ideals that had been established in the French Revolution. His rise to and consolidation of power made him a full dictator. His foreign policy sought to dominate the whole of Europe. Despite some temporary glory and beneficial reform for France, the final result of Napoleon 's reactions clearly pointed to him as an evildoer who had failed in his attempt to achieve ultimate power.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideals and values of the French Revolution and the Enlightenment were rooted from the desire to eliminate absolute dominance, secure the rights of all men, and build a steady government. Napoleon Bonaparte, a French military leader and Emperor, endeavored to maintain these political ideologies, however, he was degenerate in his method for achieving them. He was egotistic and extremely narrow-minded; he was a power-hungry man that used manipulation to enforce his own self-interested ideas. This essay sets out to prove why Bonaparte was a villain by explaining the three leading factors that led me to oppose him. This includes, ruining France’s economy, taking away rights from women and girls, and his dictatorial ruling. Although, Napoleon…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the years from 1789 to 1799, many agree that they French revolution was a reign of terror. During this time, the monarchy in France had undergone major change and finally overthrown by the unhappy French citizens. There were many reasons for this action of overthrowing the government, some of which being high taxes, which only the third estate had to pay, the lack of participation that king Louis and Marie Antoinette had shown whilst in power towards ruling the country. King Louis XVI was not entirely to blame as France could have been left in a bad stage from King Louis XV and therefore it might not have been King Louis XVI; s fault entirely however, he played a major role in the French Revolution of 1789 as he could have controlled France…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays