In Woods Pulitzer Prize winning account of U.S. society during the time of the American Revolution, he shows how the Revolution was not merely a coup de taut but a complete remodeling of social structure and organization. In Woods opinion the American Revolution was as radical as any revolution in history. The Revolution was very different from other revolutions, in that the British monarchy was being replaced by an American Republic and not another tyrant. “In fact, it was of the greatest revolutions the word has known, a momentous upheaval that not only fundamentally altered the character of American society but decisively affected the course of subsequent history” (Woods 5).…
In this book, the professor conveys major points throughout the Civil War that have been given scant attention, which America herself had previously tried to keep hidden. Professors name exposes the class warfare between rich planters and common folk or “plain folk”, and the economic injustice the planters forced upon the starving men and women on the home front and war front (14). Women fought for their families’ survival, equal rights, and became spies in both armies. Volunteers and conscripted men demanded respect, but the affluent brass ignored any cries and used them for their own economic interest. The professor emphasizes how the actions of deserters and draft evaders had previously been condemned by other Civil War documents and gives justice for their desertion. The spirit and resentment the soldiers and civilians had towards the elites are shown throughout the book as what they perceived as a “rich man’s war and a poor man’s fight” (75). The professor detailed how African Americans fought for their freedom long before Lincoln “emancipated” them and how Lincoln continually showed a vague attitude towards them, and brought light to the fact of the military reasoning for the Emancipation Proclamation. Professor elucidates how Native Americans were continually disposed, massacred, and ripped from their land with no adequate repayment. This book broadens history’s contracted lens by sharing fascinating firsthand accounts of the war and the overall consensus most Americans felt.…
The American Civil War has caused many debates amongst a wide range of historians resulting in many different views being formed on all aspects of the War. The argument whether slavery has been overemphasised is one of great debate. Some historians like Michael F. Holt concur that the slavery issue was nearly the only reason and cause of the American civil war. Others disagree, Joel H. Silbey agrees that this is a reason but not the only one other ideas to need to be looked at to the cause of the outbreak of war in America. I will look at this issue and others which caused the beginning of the civil war.…
The American Civil War was the greatest war in history. Three million fought and over six-hundred thousand people lost their lives, in this war, fighting for their own freedom. The Civil War was also known as the “War Between the States”. It created more tension between the union and the confederacy and created anger among the people of America. In the beginning of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln stated that he believed there were never opponents, and that there shouldn’t be any opposition among the people of the United States.…
Howard Zinn believed that the true reason for the civil war was truly for wealth rather than for a true dream of a land of freedom. The colonists knew that that “American leadership was less in need of English rule, the English more in need of the colonists’ wealth.” Bearing this in mind, The colonists could think of no good reason to stay under control of England who was taxing them heavily and using them as a very effective growth tool in their economy.…
A war consisting of the lesser side fighting the greater side for things such as rights and/or freedom is what most can call a revolution, and it’s true. That isn’t the only possibility though. The Revolution of 1800 was called a revolution because it was the switch from a federalist president to an anti-federalist president. It was an orderly transfer of power with no violence and no bloodshed. Some say that The Revolution of 1800 was misnamed. But the Revolution of 1800 was named a revolution in the way of how Jefferson handled first economic affairs and then judicial affairs in his presidency.…
A Revolution, as described on an online dictionary, is “a radical and pervasive change in society and the social structure, especially one made suddenly and often accompanied by violence” (Collins English Dictionary). It has multiple causation, whether it being a political, religious, cultural, intellectual, social, or economic short term issue. The English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution were truly revolutionary events for multiple reasons. First, they succeed the Fever Model of Revolution. The Stuart Kings coming into power had a large effect as a social causation because of the fact that they were the wrong kings coming in at the wrong time. Since being secure and protected was all that England ever knew when Queen Elizabeth I…
A prevalent question that comes up while studying America’s past is “was the American Revolution a true revolution?”. Depending on the whether the historian sides with the theory of a strict or loose constructionist, the answer will vary. Strict constructionists tend to believe that a revolution produces a significant end result whereas loose constructionists refer to any type of violence in conjunction with a constitution, rulers, or policies. This differentiation leads to the topics of conservatism and radicalism. In correlation with the American revolution, conservatists claim that the outcome of the revolution was nothing great. On the other hand, radicalists feel that the changes after the revolution were extraordinary. Pulitzer Prize-winning Carl N. Delger agrees with the conservatists…
Davis, Kenneth C. Don 't Know Much about the Civil War: Everything You Need to Know about America 's Greatest Conflict but Never Learned. New York: William Morrow, 1996.…
Was the American Revolution really revolutionary? Revolutionary is a great change that affects many people around the world that occurred because of an event. The American Revolution war ended a while ago but the Revolution is still happening. We are still changing in so many ways, making new laws, and changing presidents which change to country. Our country is still changing today and that is why the American Revolution is revolutionary and why the revolution is still happening today. According to documents, the Revolution is defined as Revolutionary.…
Tuesday, Oct. 5 – Lecture 8 – American Revolution 2 (& Review for First Exam)…
Plagued with the ever-present plight of war, the United States has endured many forms of this widespread and deadly affliction over the course of its relatively young life. Unceasingly analyzed in hopes of perhaps understanding the underlying and sometimes hidden causes, such wars have captivated the minds of scholars since the moment the nation's fathers tore independence from the stubborn clutch of England. Consider the great Civil War, a war that tested the United States' reputation of increasing power, of unification, of steadfastness. Often simplified and romanticized when being presented to young children, the causes of the Civil War are much more muddled and shady than any middle school teacher can make them out to be. While it is undeniable that the Mexican War accelerated the arrival of it, the Civil War was ineffable. Propelled by factors such as the Supreme Court's controversial Dred Scott decision, the popularity of Uncle Tom's Cabin, and the emergence of the Republican party, based on the fundamental opposition to slavery, the eventual explosion of tensions between the North and the South was unavoidable.…
The Civil War started in 1861, and though it was more than a century ago, there is still controversy and many questions arising about the subject. What were they really fighting over? Should the South have been able to succeed? What were the South's true reasons for succeeding? Was the North's only reason to go to war to free the slaves? Were Slaves truly treated as cruelly as we are to believe they were? Did the Abolitionists have other motives hidden behind tightly shut doors, which were not made public? These are only a few questions people want to know the answers to regarding the American's War against themselves. Some of these questions are hard to give a definite answer to, and say what is exactly is correct.…
The American Revolution, which lasted from 1775-1783, is quite evident as revolutionary, due to the social, political, and slavery changes. The official definition of a revolution is:a forcible overthrow of a government or social order in favor of a new system, but the way most people look at a Revolution, is a chain of new ideas. New ideas are always coming, and the reason the Revolution is always happening, is because of the R. Many figures from the past that were involved in the Revolution change the way we live today, and there were also documents about the Revolution that prove that the Revolution was, indeed, Revolutionary such as letters, drawings, maps, and more.…
"To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…