Preview

Was the Milgram Experiment Ethical or Valid?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
890 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the Milgram Experiment Ethical or Valid?
Was the Milgram Experiment Ethical or Valid? In 1961, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted an experiment on a group’s obedience to authority. This experiment has encountered intense scrutiny ever since its findings were first published in 1963; many people question the ethics and validity of the experiment. Multitudes of researchers have taken it upon themselves to determine the answers to the questions (McLeod). Based on new guidelines for ethics, Stanley Milgram’s experiment on the obedience to authority was neither ethical nor valid. Controversy in the ethics of the experiment comes from the deception used and psychological harm experienced by some of the participants. Milgram believed that for the experiment to be authentic, deception was inevitable. He also sent out a questionnaire to his participants afterwards to see the effectiveness of the deception. The majority of the participants, 83.7 percent, stated they were glad they had participated while 1.3 percent would rather have not taken the experiment. Some of the participants also displayed physical signs of distress, but Milgram stated the symptoms were short term and the participants were better after they had been debriefed about the experiment (McLeod). Opponents of the ethics of Milgram’s experiment believe that the amount of stress caused by the experiment deems it unethical (Controversy: Ethics in Experiments). Many participants experienced trembling, stuttering and nervous laughter; three unfortunate people even suffered from seizures (McLeod). Other participants may have had psychological pain knowing they could have killed a person. Questioning themselves over their morals could also lead to emotional distress (Controversy: Ethics in Experiments). The deception was essential part of the experiment, but the emotional distress endured by the participant was excessive. An experiment where a person could have potentially been harmed for a long period of time should


Cited: “Controversy: Ethics in Experiments.”Obedience. Cal Poly. n.d. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. Retrieved from < http://cla.calpoly.edu/ >. McLeod, Saul. “The Milgram Experiment.”SimplyPsychology. SimplyPsychology. 2007. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. Retrieved from < http://www.simplypsychology.org/ >. Mook, Douglas. “In Defense of External Validity.” OwlNet. Rice University. Apr. 1983. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. Retrieved from < http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/ >. Orne, Martin T. and Holland, Charles H. “On the Ecological Validity of Laboratory Decisions.” n.a. Babson Faculty. n.d. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. Retrieved from . Samson, Steven Alan. “An Evaluation of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience to Authority.” Liberty University.” Liberty University. 6 Mar. 1980. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. Retrieved from < http://bcs.bedfordstmartins.com/ >. “Was Milgram’s Experiment Ethical?”Psych Web. Psych Web. n.d. Web. 10 Dec. 2013. Retrieved from < http://www.intropsych.com/>.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Replicating Milgram's Obedience Experiment
    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page

    Replicating Milgram's Obedience Experiment

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adolph Eichmann And Dishonest
    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page

    Adolph Eichmann And Dishonest

    The Milgram experiment was not done appropriately due to certain procedure taken place in the experiment. This would include the dishonesty and stress placed upon the teacher. The experiment was dishonest because it attracted the public by saying, “a study of memory…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Does Darley Criticize The Milgram Experiment
    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What Does Darley Criticize The Milgram Experiment

    Daniel Parks Freshman Studies Term II Critical Analysis and Milgram’s Response Obedience to Authority and the obedience experiments that produced Stanley Milgram’s famous book have produced almost equal amounts of surprise, curiosity and criticism. The criticism of social psychologist John Darley and playwright Dannie Abse are each representative of the general criticism Milgram has received; Darley focuses on whether the study has any relevance to real world events (such as the Holocaust), and Abse focuses on justification of the experiment, i.e. was the study worth doing in spite of the deception employed and its potential harm to the subjects. To Milgram, this criticism demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the goals and implications of the obedience study, to which he has responded by restating the goal of the experiment and explaining its beneficial effects upon the subjects.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram's Obedience To Authority Study
    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stanley Milgram's Obedience To Authority Study

    Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram's Social Psychological Experiments
    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stanley Milgram's Social Psychological Experiments

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Milgram's Experiment Justified
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    Why Is Milgram's Experiment Justified

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was conducted to justify the acts of Nazi killings during the World War II. Milgram’s general findings after the experiments: Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figures even to the extent of hurting or killing other people. He claims that people can act inhumanely with limited feelings and compassion under blind obedience to authority. On his experiment, most of the participants continued to inflict the punishment all the way to the highest level when assured that they are not held responsible. Some participants went on and follow the commanded actions even if they seemed in conflict and against their conscience.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Experiment
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate Milgram's Experiment

    Milgram's experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram's (1963, 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don't think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did, they have to be willing to face the consequences of the experiment which could be a permanent damaged mental state. I do believe we need to do experiments like this as the outcome was very eye opening but it has to be better regulated and the background and methods of experimentation clearly…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nicole Johnson
    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nicole Johnson

    Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience.…

    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Stanley Milgram vs. Diana Baumrind
    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stanley Milgram vs. Diana Baumrind

    When individuals abandon their own freedom for the benefit of the larger group, they are no longer individuals but products of conformity. Obedience to authority can become dangerous when morals and independent thought are stifled to the point that harm is inflicted upon another person. "The Perils of Obedience" by Stanley Milgram reports on his controversial experiment that test how far individuals would go in obeying orders, even if carrying out those orders caused serious harm to others. This experiment caused a lot of controversy and one woman in particular believed that this experiment was immoral. Diana Baumrind's "Review of Stanley Milgram's Experiments on Obedience" says that Milgram "entrapped" (329) his subjects and potentionally harmed his subjects mentally. Both authors are obviously concerned with ethics and validity but both see them in a very different light, which is apparent in their writings.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo
    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Zimbardo

    The ethical concerns in the experiment were also argued by Baumrind (1964) ‘…. The feelings and rights of Milgram’s participants have been abused and inadequate measures were taken to protect them from stress and emotional conflict (Gross, 2015). However, in Milgram's defence he argued that participants had agreed to take part and some people could have left if they really wanted to. The participants had also a full…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Experiment
    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milgram Experiment

    In nineteen sixty-three, Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment on obedience to authority figures. It was a series of social psychology experiments which measured the willingness of the study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience and confronted them with emotional distress. The experiment resulted in twenty-six out of forty of the participants administering the final massive shock of four-hundred and fifty volts, that is sixty-five percent. Milgram believes his experiment to be effective because (need to finish this sentence) On the other hand, Diana Baumrind argues that Milgram’s experiment is unethical to alter the participant’s trust for a figure of authority and believes they could be hesitant to do so in the future in any circumstance. (what else can i write here?)…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Experiment
    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milgram Experiment

    I feel the reason the Milgram Experiment subjects were lacking the moral and critical thinking of how they reacted to the experiment was a multitude of things such as. The subjects felt they had to because they were being told to by “people of authority” They also felt that since they were participating in the experiment and they were only doing “as told” then they were okay to proceed. Some also stated that do to the trust they had for the school and the prestige it represented it also made it harder to say to no.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Milgram Experiment Research Paper
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Milgram Experiment Research Paper

    The Milgram experiment, a study based on a person’s obedience to an authority, was a series of social psychology experiments. These experiments measured the willingness of people to obey a person with authority. During the study, head figures instructed participants to perform acts that would normally conflict with their personal morality.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How To Evaluate Milgram's Experiment
    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How To Evaluate Milgram's Experiment

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram from Yale University conducted an experiment focusing about obedience to authority figure verse personal conscience. However, in this research the volunteering subjects thinks it is based on the study of learning and memory. This experiment involves three people, the experimenter, naïve subject, and the victim; the ending result was unpredictable.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 1970's Milgram Study
    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 1970's Milgram Study

    In the 1960s, Milgram, then a professor at Yale, recruited ordinary people through a newspaper ad offering them money to help in a project purporting to improve human memory. In Milgrams experiment two people come into the laboratory where they are told they will be taking part in a study of memory and learning. Milgram was interested in how people obey under authoritative circumstances, using "fake" settings to test obedience. Under any given circumstance people tend to obey authority differently. Milgram tested this theory out by putting his volunteers into a laboratory setting and having them pressing a button shocking the other person for a wrong answer. Most of Milgram's volunteers went through the experiment, not wanting to disobey the…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics