Was The Warrior Justifiable Way Of The Warrior Justified?

Was the “way of the warrior” justifiable to precede abusive treatment of prisoners? Although the Japanese created barbaric tactics, they did it to follow their moral codes and fulfill their honor. During World War II, the Japanese had seven camp groups, and within those groups, there were branch camps as well. Additionally, the purpose of these prison camps was to demonstrate the shame of surrendering. In doing so, the Japanese soldiers used the prisoners' manpower to support the frontline troops. The Japanese camps seemed harsh to people all around; however, Japanese people were very loyal. The imperial army was strong because of the Bushido code, which used harsh discipline to enforce their morals, forcing all soldiers to fully believe in the Bushido code, which therefore gave them the obligation to provide
Moreover, the Bushido code has seven principles: righteousness, loyalty, honor, respect, honesty, courage, and consistency. These seven principles made up the Japanese imperial army and gave them justification for the treatment in the prison camps. First was righteousness; the punishment of prisoners was motivated by their hatred of the allied powers. The second was loyalty; anyone who surrendered or abandoned any item or post was unloyal. Third, honor any mistakes, were faced with harsh punishment; fourth, respect, although it was doubtful the soldiers felt this for the allied powers. Fifth is honesty; if any one of the soldiers told a lie to the superiors, they would face punishment. Sixth, courage, soldiers would rather kill themselves than surrender. Seventh, Consistent soldiers had to stay consistent, never doubting their superiors and consistently following. The Bushido code was strict on obeying superiors, “principal value running Bushido was a strict hierarchy that emphasized obedience to