There is a belief that some things are better than others, which can be applied to all things, but can it really be applied to everything? Is one rose better than another if equal in age and care? Who determines which one is better? If there were two identical twins, is one better than the other? Aquinas believed that things are good only in proportion to how closely they resemble that which he considers perfect. Therefore, if there is nothing that is perfect, there can be nothing that is good. But this is not necessarily true. Who defines perfection? Isn't the concept of perfection based upon the qualities and standard set by the perceiver? Is God viewed as perfect through the eyes of a Satanists? What if a Satanist's view of perfection is directly opposite? Aquinas' goes on to say that if anything is good, there must be something that is perfect, and with this in mind, Thomas Aquinas stated, "Therefore there must also be something which is to all beings the cause of their being, goodness, and every other perfection; and this we call God." But once again, this is not necessarily true. Perfection is in the eye of the beholder.
Aquinas believed that all things in our experience must possess some degree of perfection in order to exist, but this is not true. Simply put, if there is a God that is absolutely 100% perfect, then one must accept that there is something else that is absolutely 100% imperfect. If this is true, then it has absolutely no degree of perfection which negates Aquinas' belief. In addition, who measures the perfection of God? And if one agrees that the perfection of God cannot be measured, then one must accept that God does not exist.
Aquinas believed that all things that exist display gradations from greater to lesser perfection, but this is not true. Can fire have a gradation from greater to lesser perfection? Once again, who determines or defines what is great and what is not? And if Aquinas uses this to prove the existence of God, he is simultaneously proving the existence of something that is completely opposite of God, something completely not good, completely evil; Satan.
There is a gradation that we find among things from more to less and vice versa. Just as Aquinas believes that everything that exists possesses some degree of perfection, there must be a being that is the cause of the death, destruction, chaos, evil, and any other imperfection of creatures; Satan.
Simply put, this is the weakest argument of Thomas Aquinas' Five Ways to prove the existence of God. It leaves to many openings for criticism and skepticism.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The idea of God is intense, as both of these analyses have shown. Aquinas’ idea of God is “Ipsum esse subsistens,” or Subsistent Act of Existing Itself (Magee, 2015). To speak of God as a self-subsistent being is to say He “Just Is.” He articulates every creature is “fundamentally composed of essence and existence.” In order for everything to exist, there must be a First Cause and Aquinas says God is that cause because without it, nothing exists. God is infinite simplicity and perfect. Aquinas and Tillich both see God as Being Itself (Fesser, 2011). Tillich places God “above God.” He writes, “God does not exist.” However, this is not in an attempt to deny God, but to demonstrate that God transcends everything.…
- 236 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Aquinas' main argument is well known as 'Aquinas' third way'; the argument from contingency and necessity. The first of Aquinas' ways was 'from motion,' this follows the idea that all objects move and a change of quality is movement. Nothing can move itself, which then leads to the idea of a chain of movement but the chain cannot be infinate, therfor there must be an unmoved mover to begin the chain. This first mover is God. The second of Aquinas' ways was 'from efficiant causes,' this follows the idea that all things are caused by something else because they cant cause themselves or they would exist before themselves. However this would mean that there cant be an infinite chain of causes, meaning there must be a 1st cause that caused all causes, then this 1st cause is God. The third of Aquinas' ways is 'from contingency and…
- 815 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Aquinas' third way argument states that there has to be something that must exist, which is most likely God. He starts his argument by saying not everything must exist, because things are born and die every single day. By stating this we can jump to the conclusion that if everything need not exist then there would have been a time where there was nothing. But, he goes on, if there was a time when there was nothing, then nothing would exist even today, because something cannot come from nothing. However, our observations tell us that something does exist, therefore there is something that must exist, and Aquinas says that something is God.…
- 474 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Aquinas’ first way is the way of motion. Aquinas uses the existence of motion of demonstrate the existence of God. He said that “Nothing can be moved from a state of potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality”. Here Aquinas uses Aristotle’s argument of the Prime Mover. The Prime Mover causes the movement of other things, in other words, it does not start off the movement by giving it some kind of push, but it is the purpose, or end, or the teleology, of the movement. Change in an object is always caused by an external movement – nothing can change itself. These movements go back in a causal chain, but Aquinas said this chain cannot be infinite so there must be something which set off this chain of movements, an unmoved mover, Prime Mover (God). Things change to fulfil their potential. If things could change themselves they would be both…
- 1280 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Thomas Aquinas's argument for the existence of God is a deductive argument. This assessment is based on the nature of the premises in the argument. As discussed during classroom lectures, the argument's premises and conclusion can be translated as evaluate the truth value of the premises and how they support the conclusion.…
- 923 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The ontological argument describes God as “a being than which nothing greater can be conceived”, Anselm argued that the greatest possible being must exist otherwise he would not be the greatest possible being, although he must be the greatest possible being in every way including mind and reality. Anselm said atheists can define God even if they don’t believe in him. René Descartes said “I think therefore I am”, this means that if you can think about it you do exist, therefore if we think about God; he must exist. God must have all perfections in order to be the greatest being; existence was perfection is…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
St.Thomas Aquinas believed that existence of god could be proven. In his Summa Theologiae Aquinas put forward five proofs (or five ways) for the existence of God:First Way – Argument from Motion Second Way – Causation of Existence Third Way – Contingent and Necessary Objects Fourth Way – The Argument from Degrees and Perfection Fifth Way – The Argument from Intelligent Design.…
- 1100 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Descartes thinks that since we all have an innate idea of a perfect being, then that perfect being, which he calls God, has to exist, or else it would not be perfect anymore. There are two problems with this line of thought. First, do we really have an innate idea of a perfect being? Wouldn’t we need to acquire the concept of “perfect” and “being” first? It is true that we could not have directly seen or experienced a perfect being in real life, but that does not mean the idea of a perfect being has to be innate. Rather, we can form this idea merely by experiencing non-perfect beings and imagining the opposite, just like how we develop the idea of immaterial things after we have seen or experienced material things. Therefore, the idea of a perfect being is not innate, and in fact, it is possible for us never to have that idea at all. On the other hand, why must a perfect being exist? Why should existence be better, “more perfect,” than non-existence? Descartes does not give us enough evidence of the “perfectness” of existence, and thus existence cannot be guaranteed as an essential part of the perfect being’s property. Now I have shown that Descartes’ main argument for God’s existence is flawed, although I still do not rule out the possibility of God’s…
- 1061 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Gaunilo responds to Anselm ‘on behalf of the fool’, he rejects Anselms argument by drawing a parallel with a lost island, saying if we imagine the greatest possible island then it must exist somewhere, he is basically saying we can’t define things into existence. Anselm responds to this saying that his argument can only apply to God, as only god has all perfections.…
- 436 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is self-contradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being. Thus, on this general line of argument, it is a necessary truth that such a being exists; and this being is the God of traditional Western theism. This article explains and evaluates classic and contemporary versions of the ontological argument.…
- 172 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Rene Descartes in his Discourse of the Method begins with the problem of showing and proving his own existence, but later in the reading changes the problem and it is concentrating on proving the existence of God. The first time that I thought to myself that this reading is probably about something else than proving his own existence was where the author started talking about perfection. The author defined God as “something that truly was more perfect than I was, something indeed having perfections of which I could have any idea” (Descartes, 2010, p.16).…
- 293 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In this sense, God is perfect, and would never allow deception and error to take place because they are imperfect and God consists only of perfect qualities. God would not allow one to be deceived because he is supremely good, therefore deception and error must be a result of another source. He says that if his origin is from something other than God, he could have easily created him so that he makes mistakes and until he finds his origin doubt is going to occue. Descartes supposes that God is just a tale so he says let us just fraction him out of the equation entirely. Descartes decides that he is just going to doubt everything based on two principles. The first being that everything should be doubted at some point by those who seek the truth and the second being that things that are considered doubtful should be treated as if they are false. With that in mind he concludes that he does exist even against all doubts because the Evil Genius can never say that Descartes is non-existent because he thinks he is something therefore he must be. I think, therefore I…
- 3392 Words
- 14 Pages
Better Essays -
This particular argument is also in favor if the idea that God does in fact exist, but Aquinas has a different explanation from Anselm. Thomas Aquinas presents the argument known as the “Cosmological” or “first cause”. In a few words, this means that Aquinas believes there must have been a first cause in the world. Aquinas argues that the proof of Gods existence is based on the basis of experiences. God must exist because every being that is dependent for existence was caused by something else that happened prior to it. He believes either there is a boundless chain of contingent beings that is extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that was not caused by something else but began everything else. But in reality, there cannot be a continuous chain extending backwards. Therefore; there is a first cause, something that was not caused by anything else but started everything else that currently exists. Aquinas claims the existence of God can be proven in five ways: Argument from motion, Nature of efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and Governance of the world. Aquinas gives us an argument that is not hard to interpret. There must have been one who created mankind, constructing the world one being at a time. It is very easy to go along with the idea that there is one person or thing that created everything else. While this argument is clear and…
- 1416 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Thomas Aquinas. Again, he believed in God but disagreed with Anselm’s argument proving his existence. Aquinas raises questions about God’s self-evident existence. He claims that things can be self-evident in two ways: in itself and both in itself and to us; even though something may exist self-evidently in itself, this self-evidence may not be known to us as humans and therefore, its existence would not be self-evident to us. This is exactly what Aquinas proposes God to be. God is self-evident in himself because he is his own essence. However, seeing as this essence is unknown to us (as we do not know enough about him), the statement ‘God exists’ is not self-evident to us. This, again, is another criticism which holds weight against the Ontological Argument, highlighting a glaring weakness in its…
- 1095 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
A| 3.Assume God exists only in the mind but not in reality (Atheism) 3 4. Then we can conceive of a being just like God but which also exists in reality. P | 5. Existence is perfection.…
- 1332 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays