Preview

Wealth and Democracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
417 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wealth and Democracy
Wealth and Democracy. By Kevin Phillips. (New York: Broadway Books, c. 2002. Pp. vii, 422. ISBN 0-7679-0533-4.)

Wealth and Democracy clearly illustrates and emphasizes the importance of Democracy being endangered. The author Kevin Phillips, America's leading political analyst since 1968 and a graduate of Harvard Law School appears very informed and credible. Wealth and Democracy outlines and explains the politics of the second half of the 20th century. In this book Phillips primarily explores how the rich and politically powerful often work together to create and continue to take advantages at the expense of the national interest, the middle class, and the lower class. The book contains several interesting chapters on history and an analysis of present-day America that reveals the dangerous politics that go with the concentration of wealth. Finally, Phillips gives warnings of new radicalism and argues that the corruptions of wealth and power are destructing the United States. Wealth and Democracy examines the history of Britain and other leading world economic powers to point out the symptoms that signaled their declines such as speculative finance, increasing international debt, record wealth, income and unsatisfying politics. Many of the signs that led to the decline of Britain were noticeable signs in America as it entered the twenty-first century. One might be surprised at the way Phillips emphasizes the despiteful practices of the rich considering his republican background. However, due to Phillips increased knowledge of the GOP (Grand Old Party; the first Republicans) He has concluded Republicans economic polices and biases of the 1990s and early 2000s betray the legacy of who He considers the two greatest Republican presidents, Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt. Wealth and Democracy performs a splendid job of convincing one that democracy is endangered and that the practices of the rich and those in power can be deceitful. For the most part

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. According to Robinson and Acemoglu, what is the core driver that explains different levels of wealth?…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Addressing the first question set forth in my introduction, the Supreme Court decision that allowed for the rise of “Big Money’s” influence over the American political system is the infamous…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the American Civil War came to an end, an era of phenomenal economic growth was spurred by a second Industrial Revolution. It touched all geographic areas of America, evident in increased farm output and labor efficiency. The magnificent flow of goods generated could be efficiently transported by freshly lain transcontinental railroads made of Bessemer steel. Presiding over these late nineteenth century developments was a new class of extremely wealthy industrialists, the main beneficiaries of the era’s prosperity. They dominated substantial sectors of the new economy such as steel, oil, banking, and rail transportation. While these individuals created and donated outstanding wealth, they also engineered one of American history’s most corrupt and unequally heterogeneous time periods, dubbed the Gilded Age by Mark Twain. Such ambiguity blurs the legacy of these incredible few, who some call “robber barons” and other call “captains of industry”. However, neither polarity is completely accurate. The wealthiest Americans during the Gilded Age had both positive and negative effects on American society.…

    • 2538 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Perkins has an extensive background in the economic field. For many years, Perkins was one of the world’s top economist. In his book entitled, Confessions of an Economic Hitman, Perkins’ describes his vast knowledge of economics by explaining the surreptitious inner workings of the American government. He proposed the idea that corporations essentially control the American government. From this idea, he coined the term “corporatocracy” which refers to an elite group consisting of corporations, banks, and governments (xii-xiii). The “corporatocracy” strives to strengthen the global empire of America (xii-xiii).…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In analyzing the actions of oligarchs across many nations with robust property defense laws and enforcement, a trend between source of wealth and methods of wealth defense becomes clear. Oligarchs whose primary sources of wealth are investments, real estate holdings, and corporate ownership rely on significant defensive institutions to secure these holdings. When the state both has the capacity and provides this property defense via legal protection and publicly funded law enforcement oligarchs will disarm themselves, resorting to financial rather than violently coercive means of influencing the political process. The key notion here is the exchange of government assurance of protection of wealth for…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to the argument of the affluent as rational voters, Gilens and Page argues in their article, “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups and Average Citizens” that politics is not a zero sum game because the views of the average citizens correlate with some of the preference of elites. But his data insufficient because his definition of affluent voters differs from the definition of affluent voters in this paper. Gilens “affluent” respondents in his study, were households with an annual income of only $146,000, as opposed to the .01% who make more than over 100 million dollars annually. Although the affluent voters Gilens describe make more than the average voter, and more than low income voters, their views are still highly correlated to one another because the gap between their incomes are not as significant. As demonstrated with people in the higher income bracket, the more money they earn the more involved they are with politics because of the policies that can…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Janda, Kenneth. Berry, Jeffrey. Goldman, Jerry (2008). The Challenge of Democracy (9th ed.). Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Filibusters Research Paper

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * Kenneth, Janda, Jeffery M. Berry, and Goldman Jerry, The Challenge of Democracy, 10th edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 2009.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “War for Independence” better known as the American Revolution, took place between 1775 and 1783 and still after two centuries later, has left large attributes in the way society operates today. The American Revolution specifically brought radical change to the economic and social climate of the United States of America. After the Revolutionary War, individuals with moderate incomes increasingly represented their constituents in state legislatures. Through the evidence based off of the document of the Economic Status of the Representatives in Six Colonial and State Legislatures, it is evident that between the years of 1765 and 1785 the status of the moderate, or less wealthy groups, had increased.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gilded Age Analysis

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Get rich; dishonestly is we can. honestly if we must.” was a remark made by Mark Twain. To him, it seemed as if our country lived by that motto. However, many didn’t and couldn’t deny this, since no government was safe from corruption and no person immune to the disease known as greed. Powerful organizations, known as political machines, not only influenced county…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The two concepts of the key term in Bardes that I find most difficult to understand is aristocracy and capitalism. Aristocracy is a hereditary class ruled by a small number of individuals or a noble family. Capitalism is an economic system that produces and distributes privately or co-owned development from accumulating and reinvesting profits gained in free markets. Since I’m not into politics, these two key term makes it hard for me to distinguish upon trying to understand what types of different governments there are.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wealthy Vs Rule

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Those who own the country, ought to govern it,” Is that what our country is based on? Wealth? The federalist believe this statement while the republicans have other opinions worth standing up for. Federalists believe the ones with wealth and goods are the ones with the power to rule as for the Democratic-Republicans believe the ones to follow are the ones who earn and work for it. Both have very different opinions over what is right and what is wrong, with more detail about both parties you will be able to choose who you believe in and want to follow.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    wealthy and everyone else has long been standard fare on the left. (The idea of “two Americas” was a central theme of John Edwards’s 2004 and 2008 presidential runs.) What made the argument striking in this instance was that it was being offered by none other than the former five-term Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan: iconic libertarian, preeminent defender of the free market, and (at least until…

    • 8086 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Benefit themselves- elitists, not actually in it for the interests of the people- isn’t this a fundamental value of democracy?- ‘some see the power and privileges of the ruling class…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some are so Rich and some are so Poor, David Landes sets out to elucidate the causes of the divergent destinies of different economies. In doing so, he presents economic history as a profoundly Eurocentric anecdote. He posits that Europe's industrial revolution is the epicenter of modernity and the means of how some--largely western Europe and northwest Europe's settler ex-colonies--have grown rich. He also conceives, that relative poverty elsewhere is the result of failure on the part of political, religious, and mercantile elites elsewhere to ascend (being circumstances set heavily against them) and maintain or regain independence from and assimilate the technologies of the people from Europe--merchants, priests, and thugs with guns--who came in boats, rarely with friendly intent.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays