Preview

Week 2 Assignment Acc 260

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
276 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Week 2 Assignment Acc 260
Week 2 Checkpoint- Unethical Practices of Arthur Andersen
1.What did Arthur Andersen contribute to the Enron disaster?
Arthur Andersen contributed to the Enron disaster by failing to have Enron establish and enforce internal controls. Also by destroying Enron audit papers which covered deficiencies contributed to the Enron disaster. The formal charges and jail sentence were a result of the obstruction of justice caused by the destruction of the audit papers.
3. What was the prime motivation behind the decisions of Arthur Andersen’s audit partners on the Enron, Worldcom, Waste Management, and Sunbeam audits; the public interest or something else. Cite examples that reveal this motivation.-
The prime motivation behind the decisions of Arthur Andersen’s audit partners was revenue generations. They wanted to make money plain and simple. The audit partners wanted to make sure that they made a profit and kept the clients that made them the profit. Proof of this is AA use of SPEs to make false profits and also to hide the losses. This shows that they would do whatever it took to make sure they made money and to keep their clients happy.

4. Why should an auditor make decisions in the public interest rather than in the interest of management or current shareholders?
Auditors should make decisions in the public interest rather than in the interest of management or current shareholders because they have taken a pledge to do so. Also because making decisions in the public interest is the ethical way that they should conduct their business. As we have learned from the Enron disaster making unethical business decisions doesn’t benefit anyone in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Please complete the following 7 exercises below in either Excel or a word document (but must be single document). You must show your work where appropriate (leaving the calculations within Excel cells is acceptable). Save the document, and submit it in the appropriate week using the Assignment Submission button.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smackey Dog Food

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages

    When auditing a publicly held company, auditors need to observe principles. The ethical principles of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct are independence, responsibilities, the public interest, integrity, objectivity and independence, due care, and scope and nature of services. More specifically, audit team members are required to be objective and independent with regard to the audit by maintaining objectivity and being free of conflicts of interest in discharging professional responsibilities and by being independent in fact and appearance when providing auditing and other attestation services. Through this one can see how influential the SEC is. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, auditors have to be objective and independent otherwise legal sanctions can be incurred.…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acc 380 Week 2 Assignment

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before diving directly into the article from the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) titled Governments to Report Liabilities Connected with Their Obligations to Clean Up Pollution (2006), one must first take a step back and take time to read, comprehend, and take to heart exactly what this organization stands for. Taken directly from their main web page under the tab labeled Education, the first thing seen in big, bold, blue letters is, “Due Process: The GASB Is Listening” followed by a definition of what listening means, “to hear with thoughtful attention”. When researching a little more into the GASB, it is easy to see how crucial listening truly is for them in order to fully accomplish their mission, which is basically to fully, and carefully consider all issues in regards to the protection of their constituents.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before and After Enron: CPAs’ Views on Auditor Independence By Deborah L. Lindberg and Frank D. Beck: The CPA Journal…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC 202 WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From as long as I could remember Taxes have always been apart of our daily lives. Taxes can often be a big burden for most, they can also be a help and used for many other functions. If it was not for taxation our roads, public buildings would be a complete mess. Our emergency services such as, law enforcement, EMT, and Fire/rescue thrive off of tax dollars, many of our healthcare offices also use tax payers money to stay open. The taxing process from distribution to collecting them has people on the fence with different point of views. In this paper I will be discussing the questions raised about taxation.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    trueblood

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • If those charged with governance or management fail to give this matter the appropriate level of consideration or take the steps necessary under the circumstances, what considerations should the audit engagement team give to the implications of possible fraud or illegal acts on the conduct of the audit?…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Andersen, who used to be one of the “Big Five” largest accounting firms in the…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Andersen's involvement in the decisions concerning Enron's accounting and financial reporting did violate professional auditing standards. Andersen violated the auditing standard of independence. Andersen was involved in other areas of Enron's company that made them audit work that they were a part of so they were no longer independent of the audit information. Andersen violated the auditing standard of planning and supervision by not appropriately planning the audit and supervising the audit to find that they were too involved in the accounting of Enron to complete the audit. Andersen also violated the auditing standard of adequacy of disclosures by allowing Enron to use intentionally vague disclosures about their Special Purpose Entities.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Andersen (AA) contributed to the Enron disaster when it has failed to the management by failing to have Enron establish and enforce its own internal control. There has been flaws to AA‘s internal control. There has been assumption that AA partners were too motivated by revenue recognition thus, overlooking several criteria when providing their services to Enron. Additionally, AA also recognised the retention of audit clients as vital and a loss of any clients would be disadvantaged to an auditor’s career. In AA internal control, the person who is able to make most of the decisions is the person who is most concerned about the revenue or losses of the client’s company. Therefore, in regards to the auditors standing up to the management or to the client has become unclear. AA was the only firm in the “Big 5” to allow the partner in charge of the audit to override a ruling of the quality control partner. All auditors have a fiduciary duty to provide reasonable assurance of detecting material misstatements in the financial report arising from fraud and error, and are responsible to the shareholders of the company being audited and not to the company. AA also contributed to the disaster by destroying and shredding of Enron audit papers, which are evidence to the disaster and which also covered deficiencies. This obstruction of justice had led to formal charges of obstructions of justice and jail sentence. Another big factor of contribution to this disaster is the approval of the structure of Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) that were used to generate false profits, hide losses and keep any unfavourable information out of Enron’s consolidated financial statements.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Andersen Case

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Arthur Andersen (AA) contributed to the Enron disaster when AA consulting became its own separate entity, named Accenture. Revenues from consulting services surpassed revenue from auditing services. A natural competitiveness grew between the two rivals and this is where the problems began to start. Management held maximinizing revenues as their primary focus of success and promotions/bonuses were based on this factor. The CEO of AA, Joe Berardino, was an extremely aggressive pursuer of revenue. This set a negative culture at the top of the company and partners were expected to comply and atttain that demand. In addition, AA recognized the retention of audit clients as imperative and a loss of a client would be detrimental to an auditor’s career. This is where the issue in regards to auditors standing up to management and the client became unclear. AA was the only firm to allow the partner in charge of the audit to override a ruling of the quality control partner. The auditor had a fiduciary duty to the shareholders of the company being audited not to the company itself. Another major contributing factor was AA’s approval of Special Purpose Entities (SPE) that was used to generate false profits, hide losses and keep any undesirable information off Enron’s financial statements.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arthur Andersen was one of the five biggest accounting firms in United States. Arthur Andersen is specific example about the most recent business collapse, which is considered profound in American business history. The firm, practicing in more than 80 countries with thousands of employees, now lost its reputation as an audit and accounting firm. There are many different thoughts and judgments about the case when Arthur Anderson failed its tasks to detect fraudulent financial activities on Enron and several different companies.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The new director was keen to explore more customers. They audit and certificate more accounts and made larger profits for their company. Andersen guaranteed the accounts for dishonest company from John DeLorean to Enron and WorldCom. The code of ethics which Andersen against are:…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The legal issues that surrounded Andersen's audition were that there was conflict of interest and there was lack of independence on the part of Andersen. In this context, Andersen took up lucrative management consultancy projects for the clients of whom it was the auditor. From the deontological ethical perspective Andersen had the duty to report frauds committed by its clients, but it failed to do. The following chart describes Andersen’s legal and ethical issues with five of…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 1.1 Enron

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The role of the Arthur Anderson audit team in the Enron crisis was not as direct as those on the executive committee. However, Arthur Anderson completed the annual audits of the Enron financial statements and issued an unqualified opinion. Anderson failed to make proper acknowledgement of the revenue recognition practices and use of SPE’s to divert debt. They did not react until Enron started its financial decline. Anderson spends over 50% of its time at Enron consulting. Had they invested more time on the audit process reviewing the accounting practices, the loss may have been minimized and clearly defined Anderson’s as an independent auditor.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arthur Andersen

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Arthur Andersen himself originally built his business by putting reputation over profit” (Brown, K. & Dugan, I., 2002, para. 7). He invested his life into his business and worked very hard to give his company the honest and trustworthy reputation it earned. “Andersen was considered one of the top five accounting firms in the world. It had built its reputation on high-quality work by skilled, dedicated people” (Squires, S., Smith, C., McDougall, L., & Yeack, W., 2003, pg.2). The company motto was “Think straight, talk straight” (Brown, K. & Dugan, I., 2002, para. 10). He felt that it was important for his employees to “provide good service to the client, produce quality audits, manage staff well, and produce profits for the firm” (Brown, K. & Dugan, I., 2002, para. 10). From the very beginning, Arthur Andersen the founder wanted his company to be a firm founded upon knowledge, information, and education (Goff, 2002). When Arthur Andersen passed away in 1947, the company he had built from the ground up was close to shutting its doors. However, Leonard Spacek who took over the company after Andersen’s death, was able to convince the other partners to stay together and fight thru the struggle. During his time as managing partner, Andersen became one of the top firms in the world. Company revenues jumped over $120 million in just 20 years (Goff, 2002). Andersen also opened their very first international…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays