Preview

Week 2 Ethical Dilemma

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
398 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Week 2 Ethical Dilemma
Ethical Dilemma
ETH/321
March 10th, 2015

Big Media Becoming More Powerful
American media was in the hands of 50 corporations back in 1983, but is actually being controlled by only 6 media giants. This is known as oligopoly. As if that was not enough, the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) is pushing to ban small enterprising media companies in all areas where one of these media goliaths reaches. The FCC is the organization created by the government to protect the public’s ownership (and right) over the airwaves, but its chairman is asking to change that.
The FCC already tried pushing this under the presidency of George W. Bush, but the public protested and our voice was heard. However, this only quieted the organization temporarily since they’re now back at it again. The people don’t want to give big media more power, they (we) feel misrepresented by big media. This time around, big media is trying to remain low key, flying low under the radar and trying to attract the least bit of the people’s attention, vying for congress to approve its takeover.
Thankfully, we still have defenders in the house of representative. Defenders like senator Bernie Sanders is asking big media to hold off on the move. The senator opposes the bill because media consolidation just doesn’t benefit the people. It strips us of our right to hear differing points of view, thus hindering us from drawing better conclusions on issues. How can we make educated decisions when we haven’t explored all angles of a situation?
Our capitalist nature greatly impacts the news we are allowed to broadcast. Senator Sanders explains that big media’s sponsors deter all vantage points to be discussed. When you have a multi-million sponsorship deal from General Electric and they are found to be unethical, or that their products are being reviewed for safety, it becomes a conflict of interest. For what will you do? Report them? Bring them to light and lose their patronage? Big media

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Nt 1310 Unit 3 Analysis

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    FCC: The federal agency responsible for regulating broadcast and electronic communications in the United States. (Oliviero & Woodward, 2011)…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It involves three sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, as implemented by FCC regulations. Between 1984, when Congress authorized municipalities to require operators to create public access channels, and the Act 's passage, federal law prohibited operators from exercising any editorial control over the content of programs broadcast over either type of access channel. Petitioners sought judicial review of ' '10(a), (b), and (c), and the en banc Court of Appeals held that all three sections (as implemented) were consistent with the First Amendment." Legal Question presented: Do the Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act 's empowerments and restrictions violate the petitioner 's First Amendment right to freedom of speech?…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America is one of the only country’s on earth that has the right for freedom of press enshrined in its constitution (U.S. Const. amend. I). If you take a second to stop and think about that, we are one of the only countries who have truly ‘guaranteed media freedom’, that is something very special as well as something that is paramount to maintaining a functioning democratic society. It seems as if we almost take for granted the myriad of different sources and outlets that we can pull from and learn from. In this writing I will present you with two different ideologies that weigh in on the media system in America today, one from a liberal’s point of view and one from a conservatives point of view.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bagdikian’s main argument is a definition argument. Bagdikian wants the media companies to provide more choices in their programming so that there would be something on TV for everyone. Bagdikian points out that the Communications law established that the American people are the owners of the radio and television frequencies, not the commercial broadcasters. Therefore, he believes that the media companies should be put under more control from the Federal Communications Commission. Also, he believes that the Federal Communications Commission’s mandated task of making certain that the broadcasters serve…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blown To Bits Analysis

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The FCC regulates the media sources of the United States of America. The regulate the radios and television of america. They ensure that there is not any malicious content being broadcasted to the American public. The FCC wished to censor the internet after they successfully censored television and radio. I think this is ridiculous the purpose of the internet is to be able to communicate and transfer information of any sort or any kind between people. This regulation would destroy the purpose of the internet. It is up to the user to decide whether or not something is malicious content not the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Media bias can be a bad thing, by giving false or heavily swayed information to the readers. This should be a lesson to all politically active citizens to know the news source before the…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    America is currently under a very big threat to our nation’s freedom. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is currently in the process of debating whether or not to end net neutrality. Back in 2010 the FCC made a decision to enforce net neutrality, which would require all ISPs, also known as Internet Service Providers, to treat all lawful internet traffic equally. This requirement helps maintain an open and free internet, but in January of 2014 the DC Circuit struck down the FCC’s previous decision because they claimed that “the agency had unreasonably interpreted sections of the Communications Act and had regulated broadband providers as…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    It’s no secret how powerful the news networks are. They connect everyone in this country through television media, and what adult doesn’t occasionally watch the news? But the news doesn’t cater to different groups of people. Think of the news as one size fits all socks: for most people they’re either too big or too small. The news channels have a large heterogeneous target they market themselves to. In 2010, an average of 21.6 million Americans watches one of…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was created when Congress passed the Communications Act in 1934 which abolished the Federal Radio Commission and transferred jurisdiction of radio licensing to the Federal Communications Commission. This also included the telecommunications jurisdiction which was previously handled by the Interstate Commerce Commission. The Communications Act focused on telecommunications by using concepts borrowed from the railroad legislation and contained provisions very similar to the Radio Act of 1927” (www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Communications_Commission).…

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Policymaking and the Media

    • 8143 Words
    • 33 Pages

    Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40, 103-125.…

    • 8143 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censorship in Radio

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages

     Censorship in radio For the past several years Freedom of speech in America has had it's meaning changed many times. Although the changes have gone unnoticed by most Americans, In the radio business they are felt day in and day out. radio personalities, programmers, and owners have to deal with this everyday but they too have no real idea what the Federal Communications Commission's idea of free speech is. You see the rule seems to change depending on who you are. If you are tagged by the FCC anything the broadcaster does or says is monitored and picked over and fined.( Howard stern. King Of All Media.165-166 ) The FCC has been picking on Howard Stern for years, they singled Howard for doing "trash radio". But according to Stern other programs are saying or doing the same if not worse things than he is. Stern tells of when Geraldo said (Stern Miss America. 526-530.) in a show about the Mennendez brothers being molested for doing something wrong. "Hell, I'm not for child molestation, but if I knew anal sex . . . punishment, I'd keep my room clean." Geraldo goes untouched. but Howard got fined for saying "lesbian's filled with lust." (Howard Stern. Miss America.519). That seems a bit more tame to me but since Stern is tagged he gets fined. The First Amendment states. "congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech." This rule, over the years has changed to "congress shall make . . ." as interpreted by the FCC (king of all. 165) this makes no sense the word freedom, according to Webster's Dictionary means the state of being free from constraints, possession of political and civil rights, unrestricted access or use yet, the FCC is in charge of what can and can't be said over the airwaves. The FCC is the god of the broadcasting industry, they do not have to answer to anybody they have all the power to do whatever they want. The basic rule for a deejay is that he/she may not use the seven dirty words, all…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For centuries, governments have tried to regulate information thought to be inappropriate or offensive. Today's technology has given the government an excuse to interfere with free speech. By claiming that radio frequencies are a limited resource, the government tells broadcasters what to say and what not to say. The FCC (Federal Communications Commission) carefully monitors news, public, and local programming for what they consider obscenity (Hyland).…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Australia's media ownership laws have remained unchanged for over a decade, debate on the desirability of reform has continued unabated. This debate has been fuelled by the advent of new media technologies, a number of inquiries proposing regulatory changes, and the self-interest of those media organisations that report the controversy. The Government has long indicated that it believed the rules to be anachronistic, and in 2002 unsuccessfully attempted to amend the cross-media ownership restrictions.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Dilemma

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    steal. (n.d.). The American Heritage® Stedman 's Medical Dictionary. Retrieved August 27, 2012, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/steal…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    iv. Media freedom by reducing media ownership concentration, and by supporting more and diverse media voices;…

    • 1802 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics