Preview

Week 3 Assigment Case Scenarios BUGusa Inc

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
708 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Week 3 Assigment Case Scenarios BUGusa Inc
Case Scenarios BUGusa, Inc
LAW421
Name
Date: xxxxxx, 2012
Instructor

University of Phoenix Material

BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet

Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement
Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain.

WIRETIME has committed an intentional business related tort known as Defamation. In this case all four elements of defamation are present. A defamatory statement was made, it was spread to a third party, the statement was very definite to one company, and it caused damages to BUGusa business.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet)
Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain.

In this case, WIRETIME has committed a Tortious Interference with Existing Contractual Relationship Tort. WIRETIME had encouraged Janet to break the existing contract with BUGusa for their employment. WIRETIME had precise knowledge of and literally saw the contract. They actively hindered the contract and caused losses to due to training a replacement for Janet.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter)
Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions.
Walter, the security guard, was acting as a representative of BUGusa protecting its sensitive information. Walter discovered Steve was a spy for Wiretime, a competitor, and considered his duty to expose him to BUGusa by gathering the proper information from Steve. The security guard committed the tort of False Imprisonment on Steve. Because Walter is employed by BUGusa, Walter is the agent and BUGusa is the principal, making BUGusa ultimately responsible for Walter’s actions because Walter acted under the doctrine of apparent authority (Melvin, 2011, pp.251)

Scenario: BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot
What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your answer.

The delivery guy could file a tort suit of negligence against BUGusa,Inc. BUGusa knew that a few of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    bugusa worksheet

    • 491 Words
    • 3 Pages

    BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts If so, explain. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts If so, explain. In this case Janet is working for BUGusa, the contract she signed will be valid for 2 more years. In the contract it states that Janet is not to work for any competitors wither it is if she breaks the contract by leaving the company or if she is fired. Both Janet and WIretime are guilty of breaking the contract. The Tort that has been committed is known as Current Contractual Relationship Tort. The more money and the incentive of the sign on bonus of five thousand dollars is an infringement of the contract Janet is affiliated with. Wiretime has committed a tort by enticing Janet to break her current contract. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walters actions. Scenario BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc. Explain your answer. Scenario BUGusa, Inc. (Randy and Brian) What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc. Explain your answer. Scenario BUGusa, Inc. (Sally) Sally may have a successful case against BUGusa, Inc., for what torts Explain your answer. Bugusa, Inc. Worksheet LAW/421 Version 2 PAGE MERGEFORMAT 1 Y, dXiJ(x( I_TS 1EZBmU/xYy5g/GMGeD3Vqq8K)fw9…

    • 491 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contracts assignment 4

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Randy sues Wally in federal district court in the northern district of Illinois to enforce the original agreement. Wally argues that under the UCC Statute of Frauds, the agreement is unenforceable because it was never reduced to writing, Randy argues that Wally signed the order form and that the Statute of Frauds was satisfied by performance when Randy sent over the watches.…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Janet has signed a contract with BUGusa she is committing intentional tort because she is intentionally leaving one company knowing that she has an agreement. She is intentionally leaving them to go work for the competitor so that she can get more money. She can be held liable for any harm or money loss for BUGusa because she has left the department with a signed contract.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It210 Inchworm Code

    • 256 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Design a program that models the worm’s behavior in the following scenario. Be sure to include the completed analysis section:…

    • 256 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the case of WIRETIME, Inc., tort has been committed. Per the reading, “a tort…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IS3350 week 1

    • 287 Words
    • 3 Pages

    10. The Mock IT infrastructure in combination with the data classification, those that are major should be planned to decrease the possibility.…

    • 287 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUGusa

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Because Janet resigned and accepted the offer of WIRETIME, Inc. she committed a tort. A non-compete clause is a serious contract that can lead to severe punishment and fines. No matter if Janet was fired or if she quit, if she works for a competitor within the 2-year non-compete clause contract, illegal action has been committed and she will be punished one way or the other. If she would of resigned, and then waited 2 years to employee with WIRETIME, Inc. then no tort would have been committed.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Identify and document at least three vulnerabilities and the solutions related to the client configurations.…

    • 290 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: In 1995 William Brotby was hired by Computer Task Group, Inc. (CTG) as an information technologies consultant. Upon hiring, Brotby had to sign an agreement stating that he would be restricted to work for any CTG customers if he left the company. No more than two years later, Brotby left CTG and began to work for one of CTG’s customers known as Alyeska Pipeline Service Company. CTG, plaintiff, filed a suit against Brotby, defendant, in a federal district court alleging breach of contract. During the production of discovery, Brotby refused to fully respond to CTG’s interrogatories, never gave truthful answers, filed unwarranted motions, made flimsy objections, and never disclosed all of the information that CTG sought. Brotby was fined twice by the court and was issued five separate orders ordering him to cooperate. Because of Brothby’s continuous refusal to cooperate, CTG eventually filed a motion to enter default judgment against him in 1999. The court granted the motion; however, Brotby appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Tort was committed by WIRETIME, Inc. which means “a civil wrong where on party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, S.P., 2011) The statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. will potentially harm Bugusa, Inc. reputation. A statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. accusing Bugusa, Inc. products were low quality and did not work past a months’ time. This type of statement is a defamatory “A false and defamatory…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BugUSA, Inc. - Case ScenarioThis scenario presents the case of BugUSA, Inc.; as a team, we endeavor to address the legal ramifications of each company's activities. BugUSA, Inc. has legal rights to intellectual property protection, and this paper explores the options available within that realm. WIRETAP, Inc. will face civil liability claims if caught in its underhanded measures, and possibly a civil RICO suit; BugUSA's security guard Walter, however, has also created a case against its own interests. When another company owns the rights to a web domain that suits BugUSA's needs, it faces the challenge of how to acquire the domain with as little hassle and as much protection as possible. A robbed vendor may present new tort liabilities for BugUSA, and we explore potential defenses. Finally, an injured police officer may have further claims against BugUSA in light of the company's manufacturing decisions.…

    • 2109 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    BUGusa Inc. Worksheet

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this scenario Janet breaches her contract and leaves BUGusa, Inc. for WIRETIME Inc. and that is not a tort (University of Phoenix, 2013). However, WIRETIME Inc. went after Janet by offering her a 10% pay increase and a $5,000 signing bonus. Because WIRETIME Inc.’s Human Resource manager knew that Janet was under contract and could not work for WIRETIME the act to employ Janet was an interference with contractual relations and that is a tort (Findlaw Inc., 1999). The defendant, WIRETIME, intentionally…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Identify and document at least three vulnerabilities and the solutions related to the client configurations.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Grocery Inc

    • 290 Words
    • 1 Page

    Jason and independent trucker are both bear the risk. Jason bears the risk because his contract was F.O.B. Under F.O.B., Jason the seller is responsible because he bears the freight charges, he owns the goods in transit, and can file a claim against the transporter for any loss or damages. Grocery Inc., can claim profit loss from a delayed delivery and damaged goods.…

    • 290 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Helen Bowers

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Read the case study below and answer the questions with careful analysis on the given case study…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays