Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Week1 Busn 420

Satisfactory Essays
350 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Week1 Busn 420
The American legal system, a direct descendant of the English legal system, began to develop in 1066 and is always evolving. However, the main principles or the “backbone” of this legal system remains the same. The different sources of American law include the Constitution, state constitutions, statutes, common or “case” law, a body of administrative regulations, and court rules. The most important among these various sources of law, other than Constitutional provisions, is common law. The common law process allows judges to hear cases and make decisions, effectively becoming law, based upon these cases. These case decisions become the common law and others must adhere to this “judge-made” law. In the common law process, the judge’s decision or the “holding” of the case binds future courts and creates precedent. At the heart of the common law system is the doctrine of stare decisis, which translates to “let the decision stand.” Stare decisis creates precedent and thus, when a court has decided a case in a particular way, future cases should be decided the same way. However, stare decisis will only apply if the facts of the case are substantially similar to the prior case. Precedent acts as a major guide for judges when hearing similar cases. Furthermore, within the American legal system, there are both legal and equitable remedies available to both the plaintiff and the defendant in a case. The remedy provided depends upon the type of case being decided; for example, whether the case is of the civil or criminal nature. A legal remedy often enforces a right, imposes a penalty, or makes another court order to impose its will. Examples of a legal remedy include restitution paid to the victim of a crime or the imposing of a prison sentence upon a defendant. Equitable remedies are distinguished from legal remedies and are quite popular in the field of contract law. Equitable remedies may involve the use of an injunction, specific performance of a contract that requires an individual to do something, declaratory relief, or equitable estoppel.

Citation:
Edwards, L. H. (2011). Legal writing and analysis. New York: Aspen.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Remedies at law have to do with payment of money or property as compensation for damages. Remedies in equity have to with issuing specific performances, recessions, and injunctions.…

    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The precedent of “Stare Decisis” was adopted in the State vs. Pendergrass. Stare Decisis means stand by what has been decided. An analogy that was used to create precedent in the first place would have been the protection of established authority or the maintenance of hierarchical relationships. The way this precedent was brought about was the idea that children needed to be disciplined if necessary.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSINESS LAW QUESTIONS

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A. Stare decisis is a Latin phrase meaning "to stand on decided cases"; in other words, is a case precedent or statute, that may be binding or nonbinding, and will influence the outcome of future similar cases. It's so fundamental to our legal tradition, because it helps the courts to be more efficient, serving them as a guide, making law more stable and predictable.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    paralegal

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Common law is found in the decisions of the courts rather than statutes; judge- made law…

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stare decisis means that a lower court cannot ignore binding precedent however it is not limited to precedent without considering the context of the case at hand. Secondly, The Supreme Court of Canada clarified that in determining whether a law causes violation of section 7 two points should be considered causation and principles of fundamental justice. The Supreme Court of Canada rejected the argument that there is insufficient causal relationship between the provisions and the safety risks faced by…

    • 2666 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stare decisis is a doctrine obligating judges to help persons who have failed to protect their own rights.…

    • 2274 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose. The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice, too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, and the like are brought to court in order to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in a neutral forum (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize on the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the general public independence and social order is long-lasting. The court front-runners recognize it is never just one way to handle a situation, the need for an unbiased and self-governing court is embedded in the social circumstance. To understand the whole court process there are three distinct elements that have to be consider to become a court, it must have proper legal authority and have all of the guild lines within the constitution. Courts are generally found in the judicial as opposed to legislative and executive branches of government, and ‘courts are empowered to make decisions that are binding. The notion of “deciding upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact” is known as adjudication, or “the process by which a court arrives at a decision regarding a case” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stare Decisis

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If stare decisis was an “inexorable command” or a mechanical formula of adherence to the latest decisions the American system of criminal justice wouldn’t be what it is today. It would be hard to maintain consistency because there would not be a hierarchy of law for other laws to follow. It would be hard to enforce and argue policies without a foundation to stand on. Rulings that are set forth in error could not be overturned. It would also be impossible to contribute to the stability and orderly development of the law if precedent could not be overturned.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American criminal court system plays a major role in our country. Without this system, all of those who violate the law would be entitled to do whatever they want and not held accountable for their actions. Defining the court and its purpose it’s something that will makes us understand the system a little better. The dual court system, also plays a major role in our countries system and will be defined in this paper. Describing the role that early legal codes, the common law, and precedent played in the development of courts will also be defined in depth…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Entertainment Law Notes

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Judicial Decisions: Doctrine of Stare Decisis (let the decision stand). Common law. Court decisions make law.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Jury System

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Court system is made up of many laws. The 1st and oldest federal law is the Constitutional law. This law is created in 1787 and is the oldest law. This law is held very high because it cannot be duplicated. The Statutory law is another made that is similar to the judicial law. Statutory laws are made by legal cases, which mean when a judge rules on a case; it becomes law on all future cases that are similar. The Administrative Law is another source of law that is known as the regulatory law. This law governs both state and federal agencies. With these sources of laws in the United States, the regulations have numerous aspects. Common Laws were also created in the court system and were originated in England. These laws were made to be a factor in civil, property, and contract cases. Common law was made by judges through decisions of the courts. A common law system follows the policy of stare decisis.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. There are so many cases that it is hard for judges to find relevant cases and the reasoning may not be clear.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Simply put, stare decisis is a practice in the administration of justice in common law jurisdictions,3 whereby a court is bound to follow decisions of a higher court in the hierarchy of the court structure put in place in the state.4 It has also been explained as “a judgment or decision of a court of law cited as an authority for deciding a similar set of facts”5 and as “a case which serves as an authority for the legal principle embodied in its…

    • 49070 Words
    • 197 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay on Binding Precedent

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The English Legal System is hierarchical whereby the decision of a higher court binds lower courts. The doctrine of binding precedent, stare decisis, (stand by things decided) is at the core of the legal system. The Superior Court is at the top of the legal pyramid and its decisions bind all lower courts, except on civil cases involving European law where the European Court of Justice is the court of last resort. Below the Superior Court, we have the Court of Appeal, and it is generally bound by its decisions. Next, there is the High Court, which consists of the three divisional courts, and the ordinary High Court. The hierarchical nature is further reaffirmed in the High Court where it is bound by previous rulings of both the House and Court of Appeal, and its own decisions bind inferior courts. All the above courts bind the Crown Court in turn, it does not form binding precedent and decisions can serve as persuasive precedent. This then leaves the County and Magistrate Courts. These courts, apart from being bound by higher courts, do not make any precedent be it binding or persuasive.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis which means that like cases should be treated alike. The general rule is that all courts are bound to follow decisions made by courts higher than themselves in the hierarchy and appellate courts are usually bound by their own previous decisions. This is known as the principle of stare rationibus decidendis; usually referred to as stare decisis. It translates simply as ‘Let the decision stand’. Stare rationibus decidendis is the more accurate statement because, as we shall see, it is the reasoning (rationibus) that is the vital binding element in judicial precedent. However, nobody actually refers to it this way. What stare decisis means in practice is that when a court makes a decision in a case then any courts which are of equal or lower status that must follow that previous decision if the case before them is similar to that earlier case. So, once one court has decided a matter other inferior courts are bound to follow that decision.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics