Preview

Week4 Assignment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
419 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Week4 Assignment
SHORT CRITICAL REFLECTION PAPER
Rondesha Cotton
Ashford University

Computer Literacy INF 103
Instructor. Tyrik lles

February 16, 2013

The founder of wikipedia has a noble mission- to share all the world’s information with everyone everywhere, anytime. In what ways has this mission been successful? In what ways has it not been successful? There are two main reasons why wikipedia is a great place to go for general knowledge but is not acceptable for a paper that you write for Ashford or any other institution of higher learning.
The first is that while safeguards are in place to prevent errors, whenever there are 3 million articles or anything, mistakes can slip through the overseers.
The other main reason that wikipedia is not suited for scholarly referensing is because there is no identifiable authorship or permanence to the articles.
Use wikipedia for your personal life but not your professional one. This does not detract from wikipedia being one of the great web 2.0 success.

Searching for information on Google is like trying to find a needle in a hayshack. Is that true? Was the library of the 19th centrury more efficient? Explain. No is not, Google is the most popular search engine today that can be found @google.com In fact Google is the world’s largest search engine. Google’s computers index consists of search terms (Google now has 2 billion of them) and links to webs pages. Google suggest what it think is the best website for you by listing it first. The entire process takes about half a second. In the 19th centrury they used the library card catolog it was standard in libraries before computer searching. Coming late to the world of computers information were libraries. They were often stereotyped as old-fashioned with there card catolog cabinets filled with 3 by 5 indexs cards.

How is searching in a specific database, such as



References:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    STurner Assignment Unit3

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a. Why are wikis, forums and blogs not considered valid sources for academic research? Minimum 50 words. I think that wikis, forums and blogs are not valid sources for academic research because these are all contributed to by regular people who base their input on their own opinions and findings, not by reading it or citing it from any type of academic text. These are all based on personal findings and not referenced to any type of reference book in any way.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main concerns I have while conducting research, is knowing if the information is accurate for one, and does it really help me in my writing. With sites like Wikipedia, you have to assume they are not the only sites of their nature. While a lot of their information is correct, it may not be accurate or properly cited or documented. Others have to be doing the same thing, like urban dictionary among others. It makes me nervous unless I am on a .org or .gov website. Knowing if the information is truly helping my case, instead of hurting me is the other concern. Things can be taken out of context very easily, and either I, or the reader could mis-understand where I was going with something.…

    • 255 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is one of the most sought out information website. Jimmy Wales, founder says this about his website, “Wikipedia is something special…, it is a place we can all go to think, to learn and share our knowledge with others” (Wikipedia, 2012, p1). This resourceful tool has up-to-date news, press releases, and it provides its users with the convenience to various languages. In this paper team C will debate on supporting arguments for Wikipedia and opposing arguments if it is credible and a valid source of information.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question 2 The founder of Wikipedia has a noble mission – to share all the world’s information with everyone everywhere, anytime. In what ways has this mission been successful? In what ways has it not been successful?…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    dsfsdsfs

    • 4483 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Dear Wikipedia readers: We are the small non-profit that runs the #5 website in the world. We have only 175 staff but serve 500 million users, and have costs like any other top site: servers, power, programs, and staff. Wikipedia is something special. It is like a library or a public park. It is like a temple for the mind, a place we can all go to think and learn. To protect our independence, we 'll never run ads. We take no government funds. We survive on donations averaging about $30. Now is the time we ask. If everyone reading this gave $3, our fundraiser would be done within an hour. If Wikipedia is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online and ad-free another year. Please help us forget fundraising and get back to Wikipedia. Thank you.…

    • 4483 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wikipedia created in 2001 tagged the free encyclopedia is a multilingual web-based, free-content encyclopedia project based on an openly editable model written collaboratively by a largely anonymous internet volunteers who write without pay. (Wikipedia:About, 2012) Wikipedia has at least 4.8 billion visitors annually, over 85,000 active contributors working on over 21 million articles in 280 languages. (Wikipedia:About, 2012). As a result of this open model, Wikipedia has emerged as one of the largest repository for information besides the encyclopedia Britannica, but does the high number of contributors and volume of information guarantee the credibility of the authors and validity of the information in the Wikipedia encyclopedia? This is one challenge that the owners of Wikipedia will have to contend with for a long era.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia available to everyone. If a person needs information on a subject they no longer need an entire set of encyclopedias in their home. They can simply use Wikipedia on their computers or other devices that have access to the internet. With tools like Wikipedia any information we need is at our fingertips. Much of it available in multiple languages. There are many branches of Wikipedia. Just to name a few, there is Wikibooks, Wikiquotes, and Wikinews.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Stand Against Wikipedia

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “As educators, we are in the business of reducing the dissemination of misinformation,” said Don Wyatt, chair of the department. “Even though Wikipedia may have some value, particularly from the value of leading students to citable sources, it is not itself an appropriate source for citation,” he said.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keen accepts the fact that Wikipedia can be edited by everyone in public and those authors are willing and sometimes addicted to share their knowledge around the web. However, the fact is that Wikipedia can sometimes be different from the truth and sometimes confuse public having the idea of Wikipedia is always a cyclopedia that can be relied on and referred to.…

    • 3659 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Nicholas Carr (2008, July/August), “research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes” (p 314). Today we get information as fast as we send text messages through our phones. We don’t have to spend hours looking through different books for school projects, homework, or because you want to learn something new. It’s the same thing with a computer, you type the information into the search…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Google: A Saga of Innovation

    • 2771 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Google search is an easy-to-use service which gives the results of a query in a fraction of a second. Millions of browsers prefer Google over search engines such as AltaVista, Infoseek, Netscape and Lycos. Not only does Google rank much higher than other search engines in terms of efficiency and effectiveness, but it also scores over others in terms of layout due to its uncluttered look (Exhibit I gives a comparison of popular search engines).…

    • 2771 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    pooop

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Editing. In a departure from the style of traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia is open to outside editing. This means that, with the exception of particularly ...…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays