Issue: Kelbel argued that the district court failed to instruct the jury that in order to convict him of first-degree murder, past pattern child abuse, they must find beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed…
I do believe that the nine social services workers that spent time in the Jackson home should have been fired. These people had a duty to those children to protect them and I find it hard to believe that nine people were unaware of the circumstances in that home. They are trained to see when something is amiss and they all failed those boys.…
All three of the boys should have been charged for what happened the night of January 18th. Weather they be charged for being there and taking place at the night of the murder or providing weapons. Using the evidence that was at the crime scene could have clearly helped Miguel Martinez receive a smaller sentence, and justify putting the other two boys in jail as well. I also believe that the police and maybe even the DAs office could have tampered with the evidence being lost or…
Then, a surprise from the prosecution: they dropped Powell's rape charge, but he was convicted and given 20 years for his assault on the deputy. Immediately afterwards, the court dropped the rest of the charges against the remaining four men. Eugene Williams, Olen Montgomery, Willie Roberson and Roy Wright were set free.…
However, there was no evidence that he was beating his wife during her pregnancy. Also, his wife was a witness and she said that he was a very good father to his children and he sent her a letter before the fire telling her how much he loves her and his daughters. At the end, Cameron Todd Willingham was executed and in my opinion, an innocent man was wrongly put to death. I think he was executed though he was innocent because it would have been very contempt to court to set him free after he was sentenced to death. Also, maybe because many people believed that Cameron was guilty, the court wanted to set an example for anyone who was willing to do the same.…
There are some speculations about this case could be a police cover up, some of the witnesses who were questioned said they heard Trayvon screaming but the police, corrected them and said it was Zimmermans screams they heard. Also the police didn’t want to relise the 911 calls that were made around the shooting.…
First off, there are the facts of the case. The boys’ ages ranged from 12 years old to 19 years old. Four of them (Patterson, Williams, and the Wright brothers) were hoping to find logging work near the Missouri River. The other youths were unacquainted with the four named. The two females, Victoria Price and Ruby Bates, were Huntsville natives that were hoping to find a job in the cotton mills in Chattanooga, Tennessee. After a confrontation with the black group, they were forced off the train and filed a…
Arguably, what we do not understand is how could the community believe every single word the young girls uttered in the first place? Surely, children are known for their imagination, so what was the reasoning behind trusting the girls and many other accusers and the deaths of many? It is peculiar how no one stood up and questioned whether the children should or should not be trusted. So many deaths may have originally been caused by children's...imagination. Document A is a chart of those who were killed on the trials. This shows how the community permitted the witchcraft trials go out of hand. Many lives could have been saved, if only the community had been more wary of the children. It was nothing but the ignorance of the community that led to the hanged deaths. Furthermore in Document C, the examination of Bridget Bishop, subjective words were used to exaggerate actions. This proves that the community, including Samuel Parris, trusted the accusers enough to kill the accused victims without much solid evidence. Worse yet, Document D, a piece of Charles' writing, reveals that they community was blind enough to believe the accusers. "Once or twice they were caught in their own snare; and nothing but the blindness of the community saved the most...from well deserved punishment." This quote determines the populations wrong…
Being falsely accused of a crime that was not committed is always difficult, but for nine black men in a very segregated Alabama, this was a case of unimaginable racism. Those nine men were the Scottsboro Boys, as people called them.…
hoping they would not be accused next. Most of the victims were lower class women and children that…
The Scottsboro trials occurred in the 1930s and had nine African American boys aging from thirteen to seventeen and they were accused of raping two girls on a train. Eight of the nine boys were sentenced to death and one of them was too young for the death penalty so he was sentenced to life in prison. There was a lot of evidence that pointed to them being innocent. Like the two girls were examined by a doctor and he found no evidence of rape, but he was not called to court, but he told a lot of people. Also they found out the girls were prostitutes and they were crossing a border illegally so they covered it up saying they were raped. Later on, during the case one of the girls admitted that she was never raped. Also the boys were not in the same train cart as the girls (Johnson). The Scottsboro trials are a lot like Tom Robinson’s trial in To Kill a Mockingbird. The cases are a lot alike, because they both took place during the Great Depression and they both are rape cases. Also the towns took the white person’s side instead of the African Americans sides (Johnson). That is why the Scottsboro trials are like the trials in To Kill a…
The detective also spoke to one of the boys who was there that night and he said that they had all gone to see the movie boys in the hood so the thought of going and beating up somebody had occurred to them because they were all pumped up feeling like thugs. When they got to the restaurant they thought they saw a guy who happened to look a little bit like a guy who pistol whipped one of their buddies, who was also with them that night. When they got out of the car they handed the alleged killer a .22 caliber rifle and he took it they ran over and shot the innocent kid, who was mistaken for someone else, five times. He was killed that…
* They were argued to be innocent because it was out of necessity to kill the boy…
The legal issue here is a double homicide. The two young men, Lyle Menendez and Erik Menendez, were accused and later convicted of killing their parents. On the night of the murder, their parents, Jose Menendez and Kitty Anderson, were at lying on the couch asleep when their two sons came in and shot them both dead with shotguns. The shot guns were purchased several days before, showing premeditation. The boys purposely chose to murder their parents on a night when their maid was off work, displaying special legal circumstances “lying and wait.” Due to these “special circumstances” the Menendez brothers were eligible for the death penalty. The brother’s defense was that they were sexually and psychologically abused by their mother and father for years. The brothers painted a picture of how controlling and abusive their father was and that their mother was emotionally and mentally unstable. The brothers never mentioned a word about the alleged abuse before the trial started, not even to their psychotherapist Dr. Jerome Oziel. The boys said that they feared their parents were going to kill them and they acted upon it by killing them out of fear. The prosecution claimed that the boys were selfish and that their motive was greed because they were not going to put into their fathers will. There are a few pieces of evidence that really make the brothers story hard to believe. One is the 911 call where the boys acted like they were upset that “someone killed their parents.” Two, after their parents were dead the young men spent approximately one million dollars of their parents money on over indulging themselves. Three, the tapes that were retrieved from their psychotherapist contained their confession. In these tapes they threatened his life if Dr. Oziel turned them in. The Menendez brothers had two trials, both in which they plead not guilty. The first one ended…
d Donald Marshall Junior, a young Mi’kmaq man, was arrested and wrongfully convicted of murdering Sandy Seale, a local black man in 1971. He spent 11 years in prison before being acquitted of his charges. It was because of the faulty and negligent police work that a seventeen year old was to be imprisoned for the next 11 years of his life. Due to their incompetence, not only was a young man sent to jail, but the perpetrator roamed free. It was in 1982 that the case was reopened by Marshall’s new lawyer, Stephen Aronson.…