Second point “Devoted his life in reanimation and killing the monster”, first of half was because I felt he couldn’t deal with the death of his mother, well I understand wanting to prevent grief in your life and others is a selfless and good act, but when you start digging up and sewing dead parts, you need to check your morality meter. The second half of the sentence he devoted his life killing the monster. Yes, he lost a lot because of the monster but in the end, was it worth it? The monster outlived it and through chase in the 1880s he must have horrible cause never thought coming in terms with what he had created.
His emotions were all over the place. The moment he brought the monster to life then he fled, he changed his mind about making the monster a bride when he was told of the outcome of deal, refused to admits the victims of the monster and its existence because of …show more content…
fear. Honestly the man was mess, his equivalent to the romantic cliché of the male/female that will say or do anything to get their desired partner and quickly do a 180 on the first sight of trouble.
‘Pushing ahead in full throttle in his project’, ‘Always had his passion on his mind’ and ‘really to risk more’, if you read the book I don’t need to explain this one cause their pretty straightforward.
The villain of the book, Frankenstein or his monster the unanswered question of the class discussion. My pick of the villain will Frankenstein himself. His unwillingness to take responsibility for his mistakes for dwelling into the unknown, not one occasion but multiple occasions. The monster deaths he knew the truth about them but didn’t say anything. Easily put all his hatred onto the monster (quirk of passionate person beware), sure the monster killed a lot of people, but the book allows the reader to see the perspective of the monster.
Frankenstein’s Monster, murdered a lot of people and damned it creator to a life of misery, plus was horrible to look at. On black and white, Frankenstein could easily be the villain but before point fingers. Frankenstein’s monster was brought to life with no explanation at
all.
The creature wanders alone and taught himself how to read, speak so he can follow the lives of his am assuming adopted family (De Laceys), he happens upon Frankenstein’s notes and vows revenge him and his family for the sorrows and rejection by others. When he finally meets his maker. He suggests a proposition to have mate so they can live in South America afar away from his creator or “I will be with you on your wedding night”. Then monster makes good word of his promise by killing Victor’s bride and eludes Victor for many years between Russia and England. In the final chapter after Victors death, the narration is given to the monster before he declares it will end his own life and disappears.
From my ‘brief’ summary of both characters Frankenstein the monster’s creature gets my vote for main villain of the story, fine the monster killed, but what will you do when al you meet is scorn by others with no explanation for it. It is similar to have misfortune trust upon with no reasoning to why they may occur such as hurricanes, floods, sudden deaths in family, cancer and excreta. You could take a pause and damn the heavens on why your alive. This could the same for the monster except its for all his life with no love ones and very little understanding of emotions. His like an empty shell like a child, but a child is filled with multiple spectrums of emotion by tis environment, while the monster only meets hatred, fear and disgust by the world it’s in. Even though it doesn’t go on random killings spree, like I would have done but instead buts the blame solely on its creator and even though he meets him he decides he wants a mate. That tells me that monster he just as simple as every human, and thus he doesn’t want to be alone to have someone to call family since his suppose ‘father’ rejects him, he wanted someone wont scorn him based on his appearance alone. And to be cheated and left to a life of misery. If you were in the creature’s shoes plus with all the earthly wisdom have you know would you have been different, honestly I had would done the exact same thing. Even at the end when his creator finally dies the monster doesn’t seem to have any sign of satisfaction but large amount of misery. Misery of the actions he has done, the scorn he had taken from others, and the emptiness of being alone. In my opinion the monster is just the victim of the cowardice of a man.