What Are The Negative Effects Of Bombing Justifiable

In the Autumn of 1939, World War II arose that caused over 60 million deaths and millions wounded. During these catastrophic times, the United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which combined, took the lives of 226,000 people within the first tortuous days. Many believe that the action taken against Japan was justifiable; meanwhile, others believe it to be an unrighteous and immoral act. The opinions of various individuals about if the United States should of dropped the bombs, is still a common topic in today's world. Although, many perceive the pain and grueling effect the weapons had on Japan to subside the justifiable argument. Therefore, the two reasons that the United States bombing on Japan was morally incorrect was the negative health factors and the destruction it caused in the hibakusha lives.
An example from Hiroshima the author states, “And, as if nature were protecting man against his own ingenuity, the reproductive processes were affected for a time men became sterile, women had miscarriages, menstruation stopped”(Hersey 78). This evidence exemplifies the long term damage the atomic bomb had on the innocent survivors. If an individual was not acutely affected by the bomb, they still a high possibility of radiation and cases like the damage of reproduction symptoms. Others also take into account that involved children that were in their mother's womb at the time, are now paying the price of war. Therefore, the negative health factors and devastation the atomic bomb caused makes it an unrighteous act, despite the fact, that many proclaim, that we were in