A major cause of reduced welfare is seen in furnished cages when hens are prevented from dust bathing which is a maintenance behaviour with the purpose of cleaning feathers and removing parasites. When the hens are not able to access a suitable dust bath they are seen sham dustbathing which is dustbathing without litter and is a sign of frustration (Tauson 2002). Feather scores of birds on the Peach Farm suggest that this is a problem. The hens on the Peach Farm average a feather score of 2.9, with a score of 4 being totally de-feathered. Due to the small space available for dustbathing it is very common for hens to simply not have room to dust bath or they may be forced out of the dust bath by dominant hens (Tauson 2002). The small dust bathing areas also causes the litter material to disappear rapidly after being used and to maintain a suitable litter area the material would need to be replaced several times a day (Sandilands and Hocking 2012). At the Peach Farm the hens are inspected once a day by the manager so it is likely the dust bath would not be refilled as often as needed, increasing sham dustbathing by the hens. In the free-run system of the Olive Farm each hen has 1800 cm^2 of floor space to forage and dust bath which gives them generous amounts of space to perform these behaviours and is reflected by their feather scores of .8 (0 being perfect). Although the …show more content…
2011). Welfare problems also arise when hens do not have sufficient space to move around and get exercise. In free-run systems the hens are not confined and are much more active than hens kept in furnished cages. The increased activity of hens in free-run systems results in stronger bones and greatly reduces