Preview

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
919 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Pros And Cons Of Embryonic Stem Cell Research
“In November of 1998, the country learned that James Thomson [of the University of Wisconsin] and John Gearhart [of Johns Hopkins University] had isolated fairly potent stem cells from early human embryos and grown them in a culture (Harkin, Frist, Skirboll, and West).” Embryonic stem cells are derived from the earliest human embryos which are developed from eggs that have been fertilized in vitro at fertility clinics. They can migrate to the site of infection or damage in the body and transform into any kind of cell that will fight it off. With the research that James Thomson and John Gearhart did, the scientific community and public became very interested in the topic, and the potential it has. Although it seems like embryonic stem cell …show more content…
They are actively raging about how scientists are using the cells for research, but there are a few groups, like Roman Catholic and Protestants, that allow some. “Those who value human life from the point of conception, oppose embryonic stem cell research because the extraction of stem cells from this type of an embryo requires its destruction (Pros and Cons of Stem Cell Research).” In reality, these valuable cells are being destroyed like people feared instead of donated for research purposes to further benefit the human race. Since religious groups are pro-life, it is their belief that the embryo the cells are derived from is a live human with a soul, and by removing the cells, it is murder (Robinson). There is actually no formation of human features within these cells, because the blastocyst has yet to implant on the uterus. Therefore, the embryo doesn’t have aspirations or goals like a living human does, and it won’t be harmed in the process. People also won’t start creating lives for the use of research in this area, and since abortion isn’t going to be outlawed anytime soon, it would be better to use the results of it for advancement in …show more content…
According to Occupy Theory,
Some medical experts have opined that the advent of stem cell research could be the greatest development when it comes to eradication of the human race’s suffering and pain since the invention of antibiotics. Moral observers also believe that it is important to end as much human suffering as we possibly can and leave a less painful existence for the next generation. (Stem Cell Research Pros and Cons List)
This is yet another reason why it is vital to allow more research of embryo cells. As mentioned above, this type of research has the opportunity to prevent numerous life threatening diseases. A woman named Adele Miller watched both of her parents develop Alzheimer’s disease, and now even herself. In the article, Adele’s daughter Lauren is quoted saying the following,
Alzheimer's research is woefully underfunded by the government, so it's important to have bold, innovative approaches like CIRM’s to take research to the next level," Lauren said. "Stem cell research is at the cusp of something life changing. To me, it's one of the things closest to making a step toward treatment. I jumped at the opportunity to be part of it. (California’s Stem Cell

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The topic of Embryonic stem cell research carries with it a very controversial past. Some people support it, others do not. Stem cell research costs about 42 million dollars a year, how do they afford it, by the funding of private companies. However, what happens when the money runs out? Where will they get more? Will stem cell research continue? These are the questions I will be addressing in this essay.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The real controversy in stem cell research lays in the termination (abortion) of the embryo, which is an entirely independent debate altogether. The embryonic stem cells extracted for research are being derived from embryos that are being aborted regardless (Johansen). Therefore, there is a macrocosmic debate more powerful than the one about stem cell research itself. By harvesting these stem cells from babies predestined to abortion, at least a contribution is being made to society – one that can benefit a multitude of people, perhaps suffering from a multitude of conditions. Even if one wants to debate the ethics of stem cell research, the researchers are being ethically unethical, with regard to the abortions guaranteed to take place.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Embryonic stem cells can potentially cause tumors due to the rapid growth when injected into adults. Another big issue with the research of the embryonic stem cells is that in the far future, this could lead to the knowledge on human cloning. Seeing as embryonic stem cells come from the embryos, adult stem cells biggest advantage is that the body’s own stem cells can be used, effectively removing the problems of immune rejection or abnormalities. Many people who are religious would argue that harvesting the embryo is against belief. This is a main controversy because these people believe that the four-five day old embryo has a soul and is evidently murdered when harvested. They believe that the research on these cells violates the sanctuary of life. Their argument is that the embryo in the situation is a potential human being and see the fertilized egg as starting a…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Embryonic stem cell research is widely controversial in the scientific world. Issues on the ethics of Embryonic Stem (ES) cell research have created pandemonium in our society. The different views on this subject are well researched and supportive. The facts presented have the capability to support or possibly change the public's perspective. This case study is based on facts and concerns that much of the research done on embryonic stem cells is derived from human embryos. This case study will provide others with a more in depth view of both sides of this great debate.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is an age-old question. The pro-life versus pro-choice debate has been argued for many years now. The stem cell debate is a similar concept, but the biggest difference is in most states a fetus can be aborted until they are 20 weeks old (editors, shape.com)! Whereas, embryonic stem cells come from embryos 3-5 days old. A common misconception with embryonic stem cells is that the child is getting taken away from their mother. This is because embryonic stem cells come from leftover vitro fertilizations so the cells would have gone to waste but instead are gone to help other people. These fertilization centers often have extra frozen cells. Many consider not using these cells is a waste (cirm). An important aspect to note is the difference between a fetus and an embryo. An embryo is an organism from the moment of fertilization to the 8 week mark. Whereas a fetus is from 8 weeks to the moment of birth (O’brien).According to Theresa Ellefson, mother and biology teacher, “ although I think that the pros of embryonic stem cell research outweigh the cons, I am not the mother of the embryo, and if I was it might alter my opinion.” This is a common opinion with mothers because they know how many benefits can come from the cells but they also do not want to volunteer their eggs. Although embryonic stem cells are not directly taken away from mothers, they are still sensitive with giving up their…

    • 2096 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The CBHD in the same article asserts that “...some evidence suggests that stem cells cultured in the laboratory may have a tendency to recongregate and form an aggregate of cells capable of begining to develop as an embryo...If embryonic stem cells do indeed possess the ability to form or develop as a human embryo, research on such stem cells could itself involve the creation and/or destruction of human life...”(100). Thus, despite of these evidences, condoning human embryonic stem cell research would be irresponsibility. Besides, in order to determine significance of stem cell research, Goldstein asserts in his article “Providing Hope Through Stem Cell Research” that “...the grim arithmetic of most organ transplants is that those who are seriously ill wait for the tragic accidental death of another person so that they may live.”(82). From this point, stem cell is an incredible discovery yet it is unethical. However, in order not to use human embryos to harvest stem cells, the CBHD submits alternative methods and adds that “ ... a promising source of more mature stem cells for the treatment of disease is hematopoietic (blood cell- producing) stem cells from bone marrow or even from the placenta or umbilical cord blood in live births.”(100). Moreover, the CBHD also argues that “These cells are already widely…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Stem Cell Research

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The first task of dissecting this debate is to differentiate between the two types of stem cell research. The first is adult (also called somatic or germ-line) stem cell research and is generally accepted and endorsed by all groups. Taken from human bone marrow or other deep tissues, this type of research has already been used for years in the treatment of many diseases, most notably Leukemia. Even the Catholic Church supports adult stem cell research, going so far as to partner with certain groups to further adult stem cell research funding. The disagreement lies in embryonic stem cell research. In embryonic stem cell research, a human embryo is created and then destroyed in order to obtain the intended stem cells. The circumstances which make the embryonic cells more desirable are two-fold. First, technology for embryonic stem cell research is currently farther along than somatic cell research; and therefore, it is cheaper. The more important distinction is in the quality of the cells collected. Adult…

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stemcell Research

    • 4323 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Every day millions of Americans across the country suffer from ailments ranging from diabetes to spinal cord injuries. However, new scientific advancements in the field of stem cell research may one day end their pain and suffering. Therefore, it is essential for Americans to support stem cell research. Unfortunately, the research has become the center of a controversy in recent years. Opponents of the research argue against the destruction of a human embryo. Proponents of the research support it because of the promise that the tiny cells show. Scientists have already coaxed the cells into forming several different tissues and even entire organisms and with continued research they may one day be able to cure a myriad of diseases.…

    • 4323 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Embryonic stem cells are stem cells that come from inner mass cells of a human embryo that are undifferentiated. They are a new and innovative way to help people of society, and with all innovative ideas comes controversy. Some people believe that embryonic stem cells should not be researched or toyed with, while others are all for it. Embryonic stem cell research is a positive thing that can enhance the world in several ways. It can boost the economy, save the lives of many people, and not offend any religions or people with religious beliefs at the same time.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stem Cell Debate

    • 4026 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Few recent scientific issues have stimulated so much media attention, public debate and government involvement as that of stem cell research. Stem cells offer people hope by promising to greatly extend the number and range of patients who could benefit from transplants, and to provide novel therapies to treat debilitating diseases such as diabetes, Parkinson's, Huntington's, heart disease and stroke, as well as accidental damage such as spinal cord injury. So why would anyone object to research in this area? The problem is simply that a particular type of stem cell, which potentially could provide many cell types for a wide range of therapeutic uses, is obtained from the very early embryo. To make matters even more contentious, the same cloning technology that gave Dolly the sheep could in theory be used to tailor stem cells to the patient. Some people worry that we are taking research too far down paths that make them feel uncomfortable, others think it is downright immoral and against their deep-held, often religious, beliefs. But what are the scientific issues and why do many of us feel equally passionate that the research should be allowed?…

    • 4026 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stem Cell Research

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One reason many people don’t agree with embryonic stem cell research is that they believe that scientists use embryos that have started to develop into babies. This is a myth (UMichigan). Scientists fertilize an egg in a dish, and use it 5 days after the fertilization when the embryo only contains about 100 cells, none of which are specialized (UMichigan). The embryo is no larger than a period at the end of a sentence (UMichigan). This embryo, although beginning to form, has no heart, no spine, no limbs, and no systems (UMichigan). If this was known by more people, then many people may change their minds about stem cell research.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    bstract: Embryonic stem cell research involves the destruction of an embryo after stem cells are extracted. The ethical considerations of destroying an embryo results in a controversy where proponents of the research are pitted against pro life supporters who see the destruction of the embryo as immoral. This paper addresses the objections to embryonic stem cell research, similar to those against abortion, which are rooted in the belief that it is morally impermissible to intentionally take the life of an innocent human being. The counterargument is presented such that the utilization of embryonic stem cells in research does not represent the death of a human being; instead it provides valuable life preserving medical breakthroughs, and thus…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This debate on embryonic stem cell research has held on over three decades. The controversy has not ended at this time. The controversy is about the work that holds immense promises from the scientific end and the opponents who view them as giving less value to human life. The most recent debate uses the very early part of development of stem cells for the potential to be alleviate conditions ranging from diabetes to Alzheimer's Disease. In 2001 the Bush Administration proclaimed a policy that permits some research with federal funds used with very strict rules. This policy has gathered little support three years later from the…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Embryonic stem cells are not acquired through the intentional killing of a fetus but through legal fertility clinics that have left over embryos soon to be discarded. When a couple or individual undergoes in vitro fertilization, several embryos are created in the lab to increase the chance of the embryo successfully implanting in the womb of the female. There are various scenarios in which several embryos are left over from the process and are either discarded or donated to scientific research. It seems logical to harness each embryo’s potential contribution to scientific research instead of discarding them in the trash. Regardless of this fact, much of the opposition continues to argue that embryos should be respected as a human life. Beau Watts counters this argument by stating that the embryos used for research do not “. . . contain any individualized components until after implantation into the uterus” (460). Ultimately, an embryo has the potential to become a life but scientifically is not an individual since it cannot grow into a fetus with individual characteristics until it has fully attached to a female uterus. Additionally, the embryonic stem cells used for research never reach that particular stage of fetal development. Through the process, a human life is not destroyed but instead an embryo is being used to create…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The population of the United States is much divided on the subject of stem cell research. The majority of the controversy surrounds the fact that, during the process of harvesting embryonic stem cells, the embryo is destroyed. Comparable to the abortion debate, some people believe that an embryo, no matter how old, is considered a human and should be given respect as well as the right to life. There is also concern that…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays