Preview

What Are The Reasons Why Jury Nullification Should Be Legal

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
522 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Reasons Why Jury Nullification Should Be Legal
There is a rule that lawyers are not allowed to inform the jury about.
It can drastically change the outcome of the case and what will happen to the accused.
This rule is called jury nullification. It is when a jury chooses humanity over law and makes their verdict based on what they think is right. Although jury nullification has some downsides when it is abused by a biased jury, there are many reasons to support it. Jury nullification helps keep unfair laws in check by allowing them to be bypassed. It is protected by the rights given in the 6th amendment. And it is needed to nullify the law when a person breaks it in order to protect themselves. Jury nullification needs to be legal because it is necessary to the court process. By keeping
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    cja 344
    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages

    cja 344

    Jury Nullification “It is not only the juror’s right, but his duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” This is what John Adams said of jury nullification. John Jay, who was the first justice of the Supreme Court said, “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.” So what is jury nullification and how does it influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices? The definition of jury nullification according to thefreedictionary.com website jury nullification is defined as a sanctioned doctrine wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented or the…

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rights And Duties In The Hollywood Film Run Away Jury
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rights And Duties In The Hollywood Film Run Away Jury

    Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury System Changes In American Government
    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jury System Changes In American Government

    The jury system is simply a system in which the verdict in a legal case is decided by a group of twelve regular citizens(the jurors). A lot of questions have been asked about the validity and importance of the jury system. I think the jury system is not a good idea and should therefore be removed because the jurors sometimes do not consider or even understand the evidence provides. They often let their personal feelings affect their verdict, or base it on unreasonable factors, and…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Jury Nullification Research Paper
    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Nullification Research Paper

    The act of jury nullification occurs when a jury comes back with a verdict of not guilty despite the belief that the defendant is guilty of what he or she is charged with. This generally takes place when a jury finds a law is not morally right or that it does not associate with the defendant. “Jurors decide to disregard judicial instructions and arrive at their own resolution of all contested matters of law at trial” (Jenkins & Moore, 2004, p. 1).…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Pullification In Criminal Cases
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    Jury Pullification In Criminal Cases

    “Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict that is the opposite of what the jury believes or the verdict it was instructed to return by the court” (Rottenstein Law Group, 2014). In the course of a regular criminal trial, the judge will hand down some directives to the jury. The judge will inform the jury that they should set aside any feelings that they may take personal and achieve a decision exclusively in light of the truth displayed at trial. However, juries overlook these directions and clear criminals who plainly disobeyed the law. Current lawful guidelines firmly disapproval jury nullification and restrict encouragements for a jury panel to nullify the law. Therefore, a legal counselor may not, even with the within the…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification Research Paper
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Nullification Research Paper

    Jury Nullification CJA 344 October 6, 2014 Johnny Cotton Jury nullification is defined as when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may set free a defendant who violated the law. Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. In the legal system that we use today, jurors have the power to give a non-guilty verdict even when the evidence clearly shows that the defendant is guilty. In cases like this, the jurors decide that the certain laws should not be applied to the particular case or that the laws are unjust for the case. In other cases the jurors may believe that the laws are certainly bias against the defendant to begin with. The 14th amendment in our Constitution promises that all persons no matter race,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Jury Nullification
    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page

    Arguments Against Jury Nullification

    Just like how police officers and prosecutors can make discretionary decision; Jury nullification is simply a power granted to jury to make discretion regarding whether criminal punishment is appropriate in a given case. Just as police and prosecutors take into consideration as whether the defendant’s behavior was a technical violation or whether other circumstances not recognized by the law justified or excused a defendant’s actions; it serves jury nullification to get rid of inappropriate prosecutions where police and prosecutors failed to do so. So when critics criticize jury nullification without knowing that similar judgments are being made by police officers and prospectors, people who have such bias view don't even realize their argument…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification Research Paper
    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Nullification Research Paper

    Since it has been used righteously in the past it is a hard decision to contemplate getting rid of it. If there was no jury nullification of any kind then the country would have missed out on juries taking a stand against poorly thought out laws. The answer is that jury nullification has played a dual roll in our history. At times it is a useful tool as in the cases involving slavery or differential prosecution, at times allowing racists to go free. So having weighed the merits of the situation it is best left as is currently. There is a real risk for overuse if everyone were aware of the power but in its absence the government would exercise too much power unbalanced by the power of the…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Stereotypes
    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury Stereotypes

    In normal cases, jurors are asked to stay away from the media and to avoid anything outside of the information that they are given that could sway their vote. However, as previously stated, in a case with so much public attention, it is nearly impossible to prevent jurors from gaining outside information. Researchers argue that any type of public information given to jurors may be “dangerous” (Kassin, Wrightsman cited in Greene 1990: 440) to said case and could leave a “lasting impression on jurors” (Snyder cited in…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Race-Based Jury Nullification
    • 365 Words
    • 1 Page

    Race-Based Jury Nullification

    Jury nullification is a situation where the jury gives a non guilty judgment to a defendant whom he has evidence that he is guilty of the offence based on various reasons. It occurs when there is enough evidence to convict the defendant but the jury is persuaded that conviction is being injustice to the accused. Jury nullification is mainly based on the race of the defendant or the unjustness of the ruling against the defendant among other factors (Rivera, 2006).…

    • 365 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Speedy Trial Vs Fifth Amendment
    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Speedy Trial Vs Fifth Amendment

    This is expressed in the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. Now, once a jury receives its instructions from the judge, the members will deliberate in a private setting. A verdict is reached, sent to the judge, and once approved, is told to the defendant. If he is found guilty, the defendant may appeal the verdict.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Importance Of The 7th Amendment
    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Importance Of The 7th Amendment

    if the case is tried under the rules of the common law branch, the judge can still inform the jury…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification
    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Nullification

    “It is not only the juror’s right, but his duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” This is what John Adams said of jury nullification. John Jay, who was the first justice of the Supreme Court said, “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.” So what is jury nullification and how does it influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices?…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miscarriages Of Justice In The 19th Century
    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miscarriages Of Justice In The 19th Century

    One accused is allowed to remove six jurors who are considered to be potentially biased against him or biased in favour of the plaintiff. Furthermore, prejudicial publicity, hearsay and rumors can influence the jury’s opinions, and ultimately, jeopardize the accused’s right to receive an impartial trial. In high-profile trials, jury are expected to follow the sequestration in order to make their judgements without media bias or community pressures. Isolating jury from the public promote fairness of…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    What Is The History Of The Jury System
    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Is The History Of The Jury System

    The Court of Common Pleas requested the judge release the jury as “jurors could not be punished for their verdict” (“History of the Jury System”). This event established that jurors could not be challenged for their verdict because they are the only authority to fact in the decision of a case. Another instance that called for changes was in 1960 during the R v. McKenna case. The judge of this case threatened jurors to come up with a verdict in a set amount of time. If they did not come back with a verdict they were to be imprisoned for the night.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics