What Are The Similarities Between The Crucible And Mahatma Gandhi

When in the face of an adversary, keeping a calm mind and a peaceful approach are key to finding a resolution. Our founding fathers, Jefferson and Washington, had the choice to end their disputes through violence or non-violence. They put every effort into non-violence until it no longer worked. It was only when all peaceful options were exhausted that they resorted to force as a last resort.

Gandhi believed in the nonviolent approach he refused to submit. He led peaceful protests and civil disobedience movements to achieve independence for India from British rule. His philosophy of ahimsa, or nonviolence, inspired many other civil rights leaders around the world. He upheld the truth and didn’t back down when faced with violence. I would guess that King probably looked up to Gandhi and took inspiration from Gandhi's teachings. Gandhi fought for civil rights for the Indian people, and King fought for civil rights for the African American people. Both leaders were advocates for peaceful protests and civil disobedience in the face of oppression.
At the end of the Crucible, John Proctor chose to uphold the truth, even if it would result in his death. I believe this is more impactful than violence. I imagine the feeling of knowing you did what was right in the face of what was wrong is far more rewarding than doing the wrong thing when wronged. When researching Gandhi, I found that he once stated, "Truth is God." John Proctor's inner dilemma reflects this very well. Both Gandhi and John Proctor demonstrated a strong commitment to truth and justice, even in the face of adversity. Their actions serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of standing up for what is right, regardless of the