Preview

What Determines the Stock Market's Reaction to Monetary Statements

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
13659 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Determines the Stock Market's Reaction to Monetary Statements
Review of Financial Economics 21 (2012) 175–187

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Review of Financial Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rfe

What determines the stock market 's reaction to monetary policy statements?☆
Alexander Kurov ⁎
College of Business and Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA

article

info

Article history:
Received 5 October 2011
Received in revised form 30 May 2012
Accepted 26 June 2012
Available online 4 July 2012
JEL classification:
E44
E52
E58
G14

abstract
We find that information communicated through monetary policy statements has important business cycle dependent implications for stock prices. For example, during periods of economic expansion, stocks tend to respond negatively to announcements of higher rates ahead. In recessions, however, we find a strong positive reaction of stocks to seemingly similar signals of future monetary tightening. We provide evidence that the state dependence in the stock market 's response is explained by information about the expected equity premium and future corporate cash flows contained in monetary policy statements. We also show state dependence in the average stock returns on days of scheduled FOMC meetings and in the impact of monetary policy statements on stock and bond return volatility.
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:
Monetary policy
FOMC statements
Stock market
Business cycle

1. Introduction
At a media dinner in April 2006, the Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke told CNBC reporter Maria Bartiromo that investors underestimated his willingness to use monetary policy to fight inflation. Immediately after Ms. Bartiromo reported it on her program, the S&P 500 index dropped by about 0.8% and Treasury bond yields jumped to four-year highs. Investors interpreted Mr. Bernanke 's remark as a sign that the
Fed may continue its interest-rate boosting campaign longer than previously



References: Andersen, T. G. (1996). Return volatility and trading volume: An information flow interpretation of stochastic volatility. Journal of Finance, 51, 169–204. Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., & Vega, C. (2007). Real-time price discovery in stock, bond and foreign exchange markets. Journal of International Economics, 73, 251–277. Bakshi, G., & Madan, D. (2006). A theory of volatility spread. Management Science, 52, 1945–1956. Basistha, A., & Kurov, A. (2008). Macroeconomic cycles and the stock market 's reaction to monetary policy Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Bernanke, B. S., & Kuttner, K. N. (2005). What explains the stock market 's reaction to Federal Reserve policy? Journal of Finance, 60, 1221–1257. Birru, J., & Figlewski, S. (2010). The impact of the Federal Reserve 's interest rate target announcement on stock prices: A closer look at how the market impounds new information. Working paper: New York University. Blinder, A. S., Ehrmann, M., Fratzcher, M., De Haan, J., & Jansen, D. (2008). Central bank communication and monetary policy: A survey of theory and evidence Bloom, N., Floetotto, M., Jaimovich, N., Saporta-Eksten, I., & Terry, S. (2011). Really uncertain business cycles. Working paper: Stanford University. Bollerslev, T., Tauchen, G., & Zhou, H. (2009). Expected stock returns and variance risk premia Bollerslev, T., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1992). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time varying covariances Bomfim, A. N. (2003). Pre-announcement effects, news effects, and volatility: Monetary policy and the stock market. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 133–151. Boyd, J., Hu, J., & Jagannathan, R. (2005). The stock market 's reaction to unemployment news: Why bad news is usually good for stocks Campbell, J. Y., & Cochrane, J. H. (1999). By force of habit: A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 205–251. Campbell, J., & Shiller, R. (1988). The dividend–price ratio and discount factors. Review of Financial Studies, 1, 195–228. Campbell, J., & Vuolteenaho, T. (2004). Bad beta, good beta. American Economic Review, 94, 1249–1275. Chauvet, M., & Hamilton, J. D. (2006). Dating business cycle turning points in real time. Chauvet, M., & Piger, J. (2008). A comparison of the real-time performance of business cycle dating methods Chen, L., & Zhao, X. (2009). Return decomposition. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 5213–5249. DeStefano, M. (2004). Stock returns and the business cycle. Financial Review, 39, 527–547. Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2004). Taking stock: Monetary policy transmission to equity markets Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2007). Communication by central bank committee members: Different strategies, same effectiveness? Journal of Money, Credit, and A. Kurov / Review of Financial Economics 21 (2012) 175–187 Fama, E Faust, J., Swanson, E., & Wright, J. (2004). Do Federal Reserve policy surprises reveal superior information about the economy? Contributions to Macroeconomics, 4 (article 10). Flannery, M. J., & Protopapadakis, A. A. (2002). Macroeconomic factors do influence aggregate stock returns. Review of Financial Studies, 15, 751–782. Gao, Z. (2011). Expected earnings growth, stock valuation and investor sentiment. Working paper: Lancaster University. Gürkaynak, R. S., Sack, B., & Swanson, E. (2005). Do actions speak louder than words? The response of asset prices to monetary policy actions and statements Gürkaynak, R. S., Sack, B., & Swanson, E. (2007). Market-based measures of monetary policy expectations Hausman, J., & Wongswan, J. (2006). Global asset prices and FOMC announcements. Hughes, J. (2006, May 3). Bernanke remarks leave analysts bemused. The Financial Times, 10. Jones, C. M., Lamont, O., & Lumsdaine, R. L. (1998). Macroeconomic news and bond market volatility Karolyi, G. A. (1995). A multivariate GARCH model of international transmissions of stock returns and volatility: The case of the United States and Canada Kohn, D. L., & Sack, B. P. (2004). Central bank talk: Does it matter and why? Macroeconomics, monetary policy, and financial stability (pp Kurov, A. (2010). Investor sentiment and the stock market 's reaction to monetary policy. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 139–149. Kuttner, K. N. (2001). Monetary policy surprises and interest rates: Evidence from the Fed funds futures market McQueen, G., & Roley, V. V. (1993). Stock prices, news, and business conditions. Review of Financial Studies, 6, 683–707. Meyer, L. H. (2000). The economic outlook and the challenges facing monetary policy, Speech at Washington University, October 19, 2000. Piazzesi, M., & Swanson, E. T. (2008). Futures prices as risk-adjusted forecasts of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55, 677–691. Rigobon, R., & Sack, B. (2004). The impact of monetary policy on asset prices. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51, 1553–1575. Romer, C., & Romer, C. (2000). Federal Reserve information and the behavior of interest rates Rosenberg, J. V., & Engle, R. F. (2002). Empirical pricing kernels. Journal of Financial Economics, 64, 341–372. Stock, J., & Watson, M. (1989). New indexes of coincident and leading economic indicators. In O. J. Blanchard, & S. Fisher (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1989 Cambridge, Massachusetts. Swanson, E. (2006). Have increases in Federal Reserve transparency improved private sector interest rate forecasts? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38, 791–819. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity Yohai, V. J. (1987). High breakdown-point and high efficiency robust estimates for regression. The Annals of Statistics, 15, 642–656.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This pack of ECO 203 Week 4 DQ 1 Federal Reserve Bank Policy during the 2007-2008 Recession comprises:…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "U.S Monetary Policy." San Franisco Federal Reserve. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 2004. Web. 10 Dec. 2011.…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    FINC5001_Major_Assignment

    • 679 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mayfield, S. 2004, ‘Estimating the Market Risk Premium.’ Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 465–496.…

    • 679 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    are mounting, the central bank steps on the brakes by raising interest rates. If the economy is slumping, the central bank cuts interest rates.”…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Quantitative Easing

    • 4947 Words
    • 20 Pages

    8. Bullard, James. "QE2: An Assessment." Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 30 June 2011. Web. 13 Nov. 2011. <http://research.stlouisfed.org/econ/bullard/pdf/Bullard_QE_Conference_June_30_2011_Final.pdf>.…

    • 4947 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Investors, economists and academics ignored the warning signs of the looming financial crisis during the boom phase, lulled into a false sense of confidence by the relative stability of previous decades. Known as the ‘Great Moderation’, the economic era in the decades leading up to the global financial crisis (1970-2008) left many economists and academics in state of disbelief regarding market volatility and informed incorrect perceptions of risk. The era’s nickname was coined by Federal Reserve Governor Ben Bernanke who, in 2004, claimed that the decline in macroeconomic volatility in recent economic history was attributable to structural changes. He credited improvements in the economy’s ability to absorb shocks to changes in economic institutions, technologies, business practices and other structural features. One author claims that between 2005 and 2007, a mere 12 economists and analysts predicted a recession to be likely (Bezemer 9). This delusion that economic volatility would continue to remain low was based on seemingly empirical evidence from this same period of economic history. This was a dangerously optimistic interpretation, and played a large role in the crisis by informing the severe underestimation of risk. Given the global and historical context, the 2007 financial crisis as a whole questioned the belief that the monetary policy was effective at maintaining…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper presents the effects of expansionary monetary policy to macro economic variables in the economy. The United States of America recorded a mortgage crisis since 2007. The financial sector issued out massive amounts of money to individuals to acquire homes. This was in line with government campaigns for equitable housing of US citizens in the United States. This led to an increase in loans offered to citizens to purchase homes, leading to an expansionary monetary policy. Though this strategy brought equity in home ownership, it also brought financial imbalance in the economy as a high number of home owners who had borrowed the money could not afford to pay back the borrowed amounts. It thus became hard for the financial institutions to take back the excess liquidity in the hands of individuals in the society (Borek, 2010).…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An examination of “Orders for Durable Goods Plunge by 6%,” [The Wall Street Journal, May 25, 1995] yields an example of how this cycle works. Note Marilyn Schaja’s prediction that the Fed will move toward “an easier policy stance” and the reaction of investors in the bond markets to this statement and others similar to it; the bond market soared due to speculation that interest rates might be cut soon. This is only one example of how economists’ predictions directly affect the bond market, but the bond market rises and falls dramatically each day in response to speculation about what the Fed will do or whether the…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lopez, Luciana, and Ellen Freilich. "TREASURIES-Prices Jump as Obama Win Drives Monetary Policy View." CNBC.com. N.p., 7 Nov. 2012. Web. 8 Nov. 2012. http://www.cnbc.com/id/49732686…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The current 12-month forward S&P500 P/E multiple stands at 17.9, still way below its all-time peak of 25.2 reached in April 1999. Historically, the third hike in the federal funds has presented an obstacle for US equities, although these have not always been an insurmountable barrier for higher prices. Investors have taken the view that reflation and deregulation are sufficient offsets to higher interest rates via their purportedly beneficial impact on corporate profits. They need to pay attention to the 12-month forward S&P500 P/E multiple. Typically, during a Fed tightening cycle, this metric will peak before equity prices. Over the past 25 years, the time lag has varied between 11 months (1999-2000) to just 2 months in 2007. The bottom line is that Fed tightening has eventually ushered in the death knell of equity bull markets by firstly producing P/E multiple compression and subsequently lower equity prices. In the era prior to quantitative easing, the danger signal for equities typically occurred when the 12-month S&P500 prospective earnings yield minus the 10-year Treasury yield dipped below 170 basis points. Currently, this differential stands at just under 320 basis points, thereby implying, by historic standards, a sizeable buffer even as the Fed continues to normalise short-term interest rates. Investors need to be wary that yields on long-dated Treasury security securities are still being aided to the downside, courtesy of the Fed’s continued reinvestment of maturing principal on existing holdings. The cessation of this practice will help to normalise the behaviour of long-term interest rates, as well as helping to define the timing of peak of the S&P500 prospective P/E…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Barber, Brad, and Terrance Odean (2000), “Too Many Cooks Spoil the Profits: Investment Club Performance,” Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 56, no. 1 (January/February), 17-25. Benninga, Simon (2000), Financial Modeling (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press) Chen, Joseph, and Harrison Hong (1999), “Differences of Opinion, Rational Arbitrage and Market Crashes,” NBER Working Paper No. 7376 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research). Chen, Joseph, Harrison Hong, and Jeremy Stein (2000), “Forecasting Crashes: Trading Volume, Past Returns and Conditional Skewness in Stock Prices,” NBER Working Paper No. 7687 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research). De Bondt, Werner, and Richard Thaler (1985), “Does the Stock Market Overreact?” Journal of Finance, vol. 40, no. 3 (July), 793-808. Fama, Eugene (1965), “Random Walks in Stock Market Prices,” Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 21, no. 5 (September/October), 55-59. Fama, Eugene (1965), “The Behavior of Stock Market Prices,” The Journal of Business, vol. 38 (January), 34-105. Fama, Eugene, Lawrence Fisher, Michael Jensen, and Richard Roll (1969), “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information,” International Economic Review, vol. 10, 1-21.…

    • 6438 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monetary policy is known to have both short and long-term effects. While it generally affects the real sector with long and variable lags, monetary policy actions on financial markets, on the other hand, usually have important short-run implications. Typical lags after which monetary policy decisions begin to affect the real sector could vary across countries. It is, therefore, essential to understand the transmission mechanism of monetary policy actions on financial markets, prices and output.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ball, L. and Sheridan, N. (2004). Does inflation targeting matter?. University of Chicago Press, pp.249--282.…

    • 2789 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    - Introduction I. Fed’s Stock Valuation Model How can we judge whether stock prices are too high, too low, or just right? The purpose of this weekly report is to track a stock valuation model that attempts to answer this question. While the model is very simple, it has been quite accurate and can also be used as a stocks-versus-bonds asset allocation tool. I started to study the model in 1997, after reading that the folks at the Federal Reserve have been using it. If it is good enough for them, it’s good enough for me. I dubbed it the Fed’s Stock Valuation Model (FSVM), though no one at the Fed ever officially endorsed it. On December 5, 1996, Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, famously worried out loud for the first time about “irrational exuberance” in the stock market. He didn’t actually say that stock prices were too high. Rather he asked the question: “But how do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values, which then become subject to unexpected and prolonged contractions….”1 He did it again on February 26, 1997.2 2 He probably instructed his staff to devise a stock market valuation model to help him evaluate the extent of the market’s exuberance. Apparently, they did so and it was made public, though buried, in the Fed’s Monetary Policy Report to the Congress, which accompanied Mr. Greenspan’s Humphrey-Hawkins testimony on July 22, 1997. 3 The Fed model was summed up in one paragraph and one chart on page 24 of the 25page document (see following table). The chart shows a strong correlation between the S&P 500 forward earnings yield (FEY)—i.e., the ratio of expected operating earnings (E) to the price index for the S&P 500 companies (P), using 12- month-ahead consensus earnings estimates compiled by Thomson Financial First…

    • 6943 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay on Dreams

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The basic discount rate is adjusted from time to time, in light of changing market conditions, to complement open market operations and to support the general thrust of monetary policy. Changes in the discount rate are made judgmentally rather than automatically and may somewhat lag changes in market rates. The immediate response of market interest rates to a change in the discount rate -- the announcement effect -- depends partly on the extent to which the change has been anticipated. If rates have adjusted in anticipation of a change in the discount rate, the actual event may have only moderate effects on market conditions.…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics