Preview

What Does Aristotle Identify as the Ultimate Human Good? Why Does He Select That Condition?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1794 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Does Aristotle Identify as the Ultimate Human Good? Why Does He Select That Condition?
In the quest to find out what is the ultimate human good, Aristotle dedicated Book 1 of the Nicomachean Ethics to provide an account of what is the ultimate human good, and what it consists of. This essay will examine why Aristotle thinks that eudaimonia (happiness), is the ultimate human good. Through this discussion, we will see Aristotle suggest four central views which are critical to eudaimonia being the ultimate human good. Firstly, one has to live a life according to one’s function. Secondly, natural, virtuous activity is required in order to live a life of happiness. Thirdly, one requires possessing external goods such as wealth, power and friends in order to be happy. Last but not least, in order to live a life of happiness, one has to live a whole life in accordance to virtue in order to determine if the person lived a happy life.
Whatever we do in life, according to Aristotle, we do for the sake of some good, or at least something we perceive to be good (Ross, Book 1, chap. 1). Aristotle points out that ends pursued for some further purpose, such as wealth is said to be incomplete because it has not reached the final end (Ross, Book I). Without a final end, all actions will be pointless and empty. Aristotle’s search for the ultimate good is a search for the “highest good”. Aristotle argues that the good must be something complete, which is not desired for some further end (Ross, Book I). Therefore it is just to say that the most complete end is intrinsically valuable.
Aristotle proposes that eudaimonia is the most intrinsically valuable. Eudaimonia is defined as happiness, or well-being. It is the universally recognized chief good (Runes, 2004). Happiness is the ultimate human good, because when we ask ourselves why we do something, ultimately we come to the conclusion – because it makes us happy. Happiness is an end to itself. It is the ultimate human good. Through this, we can see three distinct characteristics to happiness: it is desirable for


Cited: Runes, D. Dagobert. Dictionary of Philosophy. July 10, 2004. Digital Text International. April 5th, 2007. http://www.ditext.com/runes/e.html Ross, D. W. “Nicomachean Ethic, Book 1.” Nicomachean Ethics. 350 BC. March 28th, 2007. http://www.constitution.org/ari/ethic_01.htm#1.1
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Arguments And Ideas In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments And Ideas In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    In Book 1, Aristotle states “but in every activity and undertaking, it is the end, for it is for the sake of this that they all do the rest” (Arist. EN 1.7, 1097a21, trans. Rowe). By excising this rationality for goodness, it ultimately leads to happiness, which is the reason for all action. Here, Aristotle supplies his teleological perspective that humans are goal or purpose oriented. For businesspersons, the goal could be considered to supply goods and services while adding value to all stakeholders. Although, Aristotle would argue that the goal of the businessperson is not an end in itself, rather it is a subordinate end that creates means to higher ends. Thus, to understand how to be a good person, one must understand the higher end purpose, happiness, which is pursued for its own sake. Aristotle's conception of happiness focuses on the activity of success and fulfillment (Green, R. M. G. A., 2013, p. 9). Aristotle considers happiness as an activity. For the businessperson this could mean receiving a promotion. Happiness is not a single activity, rather it is the consistent exercise of reason and appropriate virtues that lead to success and fulfillment (Green, R. M. G. A., 2013, p. 10). The virtues…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle and John Stuart Mill on Happiness and Morality
    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Aristotle and John Stuart Mill on Happiness and Morality

    In this section I will explain Aristotle’s definition of eudaimonia and its relationship to happiness, morality and the virtues. Aristotle defines eudaimonia in the first book of the Nicomachean Ethics as “virtuous activity in accordance with reason” and that this is the highest good for human beings. For Aristotle, eudaimonia can be translated into a “human life of flourishing” since it occurs throughout a person’s life. This lifelong happiness is complete and sufficient in itself, meaning that a person lives it as an end in itself and not for anything else beyond it. An important aspect of reaching our own eudaimonia is to function well as human beings. Aristotle presents his concept of the human function by stating that what makes human function so distinct is not just to obtain nutrition and to grow because that aspect of life is shared with plants and it is also not perception because that is something shared with animals. Our ultimate human function therefore is reason and not just reason alone but to act in accordance to reason.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    A Critical Study of Virtue Ethics in Aristotle and Kant
    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Critical Study of Virtue Ethics in Aristotle and Kant

    Three works on ethics have come down under his name: Nicomachean ethics in ten ‘books’, Eudemian ethics in eight ‘books’, and the so-called Magna Moralia or ‘great Ethics’. In these Nicomachean ethics is considered as Aristotle’s major and definitive work in ethics at least than others. According to Aristotle the highest good for human beings is Eudaimonia/happiness and that a rational choice of life will be one directed to one’s own happiness. Only a life in which one cultivates the traditional virtues will be a happy life. Eudaimonia, or 'happiness ', is the supreme goal of human life. Aristotle believed that everything has a purpose - the good for a knife is to cut, and a good knife is one that cuts well. In the same way, Eudaimonia is the 'good ' for a person.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato's View on Happiness
    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Aristotle vs Plato's View on Happiness

    Many people try to define and consider different definitions of what happiness is, and I think that Plato and Aristotle offer interesting views of happiness and what it means for one to live a good life. Both philosophers agree that happiness is an important factor in one’s life and essentially the essence of how to live a good life. Plato offers many theories and definitions of justice leading to happiness, while Aristotle argues that happiness is the main goal that all humans aim for in their entire life. Plato offers a philosophical view of a happy life for an individual by explaining a just state and what it would entail and also the theory of the forms that one must understand to achieve happiness. After learning about both philosophers, I have come to the conclusion that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness more because he gives us a broad outline of what a good life is. Although Plato was Aristotle’s mentor, Aristotle offers a view of happiness that is more plausible and relevant than Plato’s because it places a large emphasis on the idea of the function of a human being. Therefore, in this paper, I will argue that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness over Plato’s because of the way Aristotle describes how humans can achieve the greatest good in life: happiness.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Argument In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Argument In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    His first endeavor is to say that humans should act wholly rationally in all situations, as rationalism is the highest form of thought that we can aspire to, and therefore would enable us to make the most sound decisions. Secondly, he argues that people have a “function” or purpose which they must fulfill, and said “function” is to achieve the Greek concept of “eudaimonia,” or happiness. Finally, we should aspire to have “excellences of character.” To have an “excellence of character,” one should seek intermediates between traits, an example being that the intermediate of cowardice and recklessness is courage. When combining these three principles, Aristotle believes that a person will achieve eudaimonia, a Greek word meaning overall happiness, or a general satisfaction with one’s own life, a polar opposite to the French word…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Better Morality: Kant and Aristotle on Happiness
    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Better Morality: Kant and Aristotle on Happiness

    It is clear that Aristotle thinks happiness is what every human desires. He defines happiness as the highest good (Ethics 1095a), which by definition every person pursues as an ultimate end (1094a). Furthermore, he says that happiness can only be achieved through fulfillment of our characteristic activity, which is the thing that something does which makes it be that thing; for example, the characteristic activity of a flute-player is playing the flute. The good of anything with a characteristic activity is to perform that activity well (1097b). The characteristic activity of a human, says Aristotle, is a life concerned with reason (1098a), or more specifically, the activity of a soul concerned with reason. Therefore, the good of a human is to perform this activity well; that is, to live a life in accordance with virtue. Because this is a good of the soul, and goods of the soul are the best type of good (1098b), and because achieving the good of a human is the ultimate goal of being a human, Aristotle says that a life in accordance with…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Aim of Man
    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Aim of Man

    Aristotle starts off in his essay explaining the definitions of Good, Primacy of Statecraft and the study of Ethics. He defines good as where all things are to be aimed, for example health. He then defines Statecraft as citizens of a state, a country, and of the world need to do good for their own good but more importantly for the good of the state. He also characterizes various types of good. Finally, the definition on study of Ethics. This talks about the pure excellence of justice that involves the disagreements and agreements of uncertainty and certainty. Aristotle also talks about happiness and where a certain point can be overlooked and how arguments can be led from first principles. First principles came about in a variety of ways: by induction, direct perception, and habituation. The question then leads to where the sources of happiness come from but a result of virtue of learning or some kind of training. Because the virtue of learning and the some kind of training is rewarded by a blessing that is generally shared but with the exception of the virtue being stunted. Aristotle concludes his essay by examining the most human element, the soul, and its relationship to virtue. Aristotle’s definition of happiness is, “Happiness is a certain activity of the soul in accordance with perfect virtue”.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis
    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy 120w
    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Philosophy 120w

    Looking at the world as a big picture and everyone who is in it, they all seem to strive for the same thing in life, happiness. Happiness or Eudemonia as Aristotle calls it, is created through the process of combining five different components. These are the following components: Human function, the rational part of the soul, habituation, character, and virtue. Since our society craves happiness and views it as the best achievement we could have, Aristotle described it as the ultimate end.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Niconmachean Ethics
    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle's Niconmachean Ethics

    In Books 9-11 of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle works to segregate the explanations of happiness as a result of fortune and happiness as a result of virtuous actions. However, after he reaches an ideologically pure explanation, he quickly pivots backwards, settling on an explanation that incorporates elements of both theories. This allows posthumous events to affect one’s state of happiness, impacts his definition of happiness, and exemplifies the text’s ideological inclusion.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Apology And Nicomachean Ethics
    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Apology And Nicomachean Ethics

    A big question of western civilization is how one achieves human excellence. The answer lies in the words of two well-known philosophers, Socrates and Aristotle. Throughout Plato’s, The Apology, and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, the two tell all as to what it means to be a genuine, good person. In Socrates defense speech he explains to the jury what it means to be a just person, shown through his own actions in Greek society. Aristotle writes about what it takes to achieve happiness and how in doing so one becomes a virtuous person.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle
    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle

    Aristotle believes that there is only one goal, one ultimate end for every individual—that is eudaimonia, translated as happiness, not as a feeling but happiness as the highest human good or a life full of activity. He claims that a person should live a way of life distinct from the lives of animals, where they only live for the sake of living or pleasure.1 As human beings, people should use their power of speech to communicate and make rational decisions within a polity, striving to live their lives up to their full potential and to their full capacity for a happy life.2 The life of politics, the via activa, is thus the key to the chief good or the best life for humans; however, the life of action must be of certain type of quality, in accordance with reason, since different actions may lead to the good or the bad life. In other words, a person’s actions must be in line with arête, with virtue or excellence.3…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Odyssey: The Human Ideal
    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Odyssey: The Human Ideal

    The basic idea behind Aristotle’s book is that the ultimate goal in life is to achieve true happiness. This particular idea makes the most sense to me. “Happiness, then, is found to be something perfect and self-sufficient, being the end to which our actions are directed” (Aristotle, Page 15). This quote states that happiness is the final, the end and all other things will lead up to this. Happiness is stated to direct our actions because people all want to be happy. This idea gives people the feeling of “self-sufficient” because no other person can make another person achieve the ultimate good because it is all dependent on the person. Happiness is a perfect thing because no one truly knows what it is until they reach it themselves. The idea of happiness is subjective around the world given the different cultures so it is impossible to even begin to describe specifically how to reach the ultimate good. He also says "Since happiness is a certain sort of activity of the soul in accord with complete virtue, we must examine virtue; for that will perhaps also be a way to study happiness better" (Aristotle, 16). Happiness is a virtue and in order to know happiness then you need to have an idea of what a virtue is. Virtue is the behavior showing high moral standards. Moral standards are important in all culture and especially in the Geek culture because of the gods who…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Kant Vs Aristotle
    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kant Vs Aristotle

    In Aristotle’s work ‘Nicomachean Ethics’ he defines eudaimonia as ‘activity of the soul in accord with virtue, and indeed with the best and most complete virtue if there are more virtues than one’ (Zunjic, n.d.), and he identifies eudaimonia as the highest good as it meets two conditions that must be met in order to be considered the highest good: completeness and self-sufficiency. His work ‘Nicomachean Ethics’ however presents two views on what happiness is, a inclusive conception and a dominant conception. The inclusive conception consists of many different things that are considered to be intrinsically valuable such as happiness itself, whilst…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics