Preview

What does David Cameron believe in?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
345 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What does David Cameron believe in?
David Cameron

David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (2010-present).
David Cameron won the subsequent leadership campaign. Cameron beat his closest rival, David Davis, by a margin of more than two to one, taking 134,446 votes to 64,398. He then announced his intention to reform and realign the Conservatives, saying they needed to change the way they looked, felt, thought and behaved, advocating a more centre-right stance as opposed to their recent staunchly right-wing platform.[33] Although Cameron's views are probably left of the party membership and he has sought to make the Conservative brand more attractive to young, socially liberal voters,[34] he has also expressed his admiration for former PM Margaret Thatcher, describing himself as a "big fan of Thatcher's", though he questions whether that makes him a "Thatcherite". For most of 2006 and the first half of 2007, polls showed leads over Labour for the Conservatives.[35]
Polls became more volatile in the summer of 2007 with the accession of Gordon Brown as Prime Minister although polls gave the Conservatives a lead after October of that year and, by May 2008, with the UK's economy sliding into its first recession since 1992, and a week after local council elections, a YouGov poll commissioned by The Sun newspaper was published giving the Conservative Party a 26-point lead over Labour, its largest lead since 1968.[36] The Conservatives gained control of the London mayoralty for the first time in May 2008 after Boris Johnson defeated Labour incumbent Ken Livingstone.[37]
The Conservative lead in the opinion polls had been almost unbroken for nearly three years when Britain finally went to the polls on 6 May 2010, though since the turn of 2010 most polls had shown the Conservative lead as less than 10 points wide. The election ended in a hung parliament with the Conservatives having the most seats (306) but being 20 seats short of an overall majority. Following the resignation of Gordon

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One reason why the Conservatives won was there Stop-Go economic policy. Although the policy itself was bad the Conservatives engineered it by making it a go period when the election came round. They did this by ‘electioneering’ the Budget and cut income tax, purchase tax and the duty on beer. This made the public feel like the economy was good.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Possibly the most important reason for the Tory victory was the growing economic prosperity. This ideology was one of the Tories key focuses since they came back into power in the post war elections of 1951 and Macmillan did a sterling job in continuing the great work by creating what was known as the “age of affluence” allowing Britain to shine through as one of the World’s major economic powers. Bolstered by an improvement of world trade in the later 1950s, which enabled Britain to import about 29% more goods than it had in 1951 for the name number of exports proved that Britain was truly changing for the good. This massive economic growth also had a positive effect on the citizens who saw their average weekly wage double since 1951. The increase in real wages saw an augmented national purchase of goods such as TVs, motorbikes and cars. This sudden and vast economic recovery was harmful to Labour’s electoral campaign. With the working classes able to afford considerably more under Conservative rule due to the mass economic prosperity left Labour without a message or a receptive audience as the former traditional Labour voters were now middle-class conservatives. I think the age of the economic prosperity proving “life was better” with the conservatives was the most paramount factor that contributed to their victory.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the 1924 Labour government was undoubtedly one of the most important developments in party politics, there were other factors that contributed to the change from Liberal vs Conservatives in the 1880 to Labour vs conservative with Liberal's downfall by 1951. The 1924 Labour government was arguably a significant development as it was the first time Labour won an election, proving they had progressed from a small independent party to a real opponent of the Conservatives. This was significant as it showed that Labour had finally gotten their foot in the door and how Conservatives had not fully recovered from their decline in the previous 2 decades. The win was a huge shock to the Conservatives, but they won in a weak position and only lasted 10 months.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 1935 election the Liberals campaigned by saying that Conservatives had stolen most of their new reforms from the Liberals, who were better able to operate them. The depression gave King his greatest Parliamentary majority up to that time, 171 seats out of 245.…

    • 3163 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Cameron took over as Conservative Party leader in 2005. Due to his privileged background, upbringing and education many see him as the stereotypical Tory politician, supportive of those with money, out of touch with the problems faced by the working classes and stuck in the traditional values of a bygone age. We have seen since he became Prime Minister however that he is far more liberal than many of his fellow Party members.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing that affects voters’ minds when they cast their vote is there current living conditions. If they are prospering economically and enjoying life, a change to that would not be welcomed warmly. An example of this was in 2001; New Labour had won by a land slide in 1997 and did so again in 2001. Many political commentators believe that Tony Blair and his chancellor of the exchequer Gordon Browns success in national economic growth had its part to play. Most voters were enjoying the economic boom and did not want an end to that. It will also be quite interesting to see the outcome of the 2010 election is due to the fact many blame Gordon Brown for leading the country into recession and of course as many more people are unemployed or struggling financially more people want change.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thatcher offered different and better ideas for the country and government which many people believed an improvement, gaining her a lot of popularity amongst the public but before the Conservatives were in government with Thatcher, the Labour party had a few difficulties (such as the winter of Discontent) whilst in power, which is possibly why the Conservatives won the General election. However this win could be purely down to the conservatives and their new policies or it could’ve been down to the failure of the Labour party. I believe that it was combination of the two that led to the Conservatives win but the win, as much as it seemed likely wasn’t indefinitely certain.…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea that the prime minister is now more presidential is drawn from the knowledge of the United States president and how the British Prime Minister is compared to him. Firstly, the media turns the Prime Minister into a political celebrity. The action the Prime Minister takes is published in newspapers and television. The Prime minister is the spokesperson for the government. This is presidential in the sense that the PM is in the hot seat among his peers, which the president would be but only because he doesn't really have any peers.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Last an absolute ruler should have full control over their military. After the Parliamentary elections of 1690, William began to favor the Tories, led by Danby and Nottingham. While the Tories favored preserving the king's prerogatives, William…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prime Ministers of the last 25 years have been notes for deviating of what would be considered ‘Prime Ministerial’ into more of a ‘Presidential’ role. This is due to the expansion of a key power that the Prime Minister has, that of the Chief Executive, being expanded.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    |Following the election of the New Labour government into power in the UK in 1997, referendum on the devolution of power in both|…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea that the prime minister is now more presidential is drawn from the knowledge of the United States president and how the British Prime Minister compares to him. Firstly, the media turns the Prime Minister into a political celebrity. The actions the Prime Minister takes inside parliament and also much of the PM’s personal life is publicised in newspapers and television. The Prime minister is the spokesperson for the government. Although their access to the media can be used for personal benefit, the media has been more critical of politicians in recent years. There is evidence of this as the BBC made allegations that the Iraq dossier was ‘sexed up’ during Tony Blair’s time as Prime Minister (class notes). The U.S President tends to have media coverage also. The wider use of special advisors increases how presidential the Prime Minister appears. The ‘Spatial leadership’ that the Prime Minister now adopts also gives us this impression. Prime Ministers now distance themselves from parties and government and develop their own ideologies. Examples of this include Blairism and Thatcherism (class notes). In times of distress in the country the people often turn to the Prime Minister in search of a solution. They PM tends…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Mattias Mattijis in “David Cameron’s Dangerous Game.” Foreign Affairs. 92(5), 2013: pp10-16, a British exit from the EU will not be the result of rational political or economic calculations. Mattias Mattijis says David Cameron is playing dangerous game that is the flirtation concerning possible withdrawal from the European Union. The right-wing has been putting pressure on Cameron to withdraw from the EU and this actions as emulating those of other Prime Ministers like Margaret Thatcher, with the resulting negatives against the conservative party. The relationship between United Kingdom and Europe has never amicable, so it looks like a marriage of convenience. Nowadays, Cameron and his chancellor of the exchequer, George Osborne, have put British economy’s lack of growth down to the European sovereign debt crisis not his own government’s problems. That’s the one reason why many British people are in favor of leaving the EU. However, the author says the idea that economy of the United Kingdom would be better off outside the EU is misguided. If the British leave the Common Market in Europe, economy of the British would be restricted than now. Also, the EU will loose their power on economic and defense policy. Isolation of the British apart from the EU would be harmful both the British and the EU. Therefore, Cameron should make an objective observation of the situation of his country and appease the Euroskeptics in his party. The United Kingdom should remain in the Europe community and make amicable relationship with the them.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays