The normal answer is likely to arrive at the conclusion that under monopoly the industry will produce a lower output at a higher price as compared to perfect competition. This will result in a loss of technical/productive and allocative efficiency. Good candidates might also comment on the loss of consumer welfare and sovereignty. The candidate who, in addition, comments on the possibility of economies of scale under monopoly would obviously score very highly.
Monopoly * only one seller the firm is the industry * firm faces the market demand curve and is a price-maker * demand is inelastic because no substitutes are available firm has significant market power * entry into industry is blocked by barriers * economies of scale natural monopoly * patents * ownership of key resources * legal restriction on entry
EFFECIENCY IS REDUCED WHEN A COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY IS MONOPOLISED
1. Lack of competition
The lack of competition may give a monopolist less incentive to invest in new ideas. Even if the monopolist benefits from economies of scale, they have little incentive to control their costs and 'X' inefficiencies will mean that there will be no real cost savings compared to a competitive market. 2. Reduced consumer surplus
If the industry is taken over by a monopolist the profit-maximising point (MC=MR) is at price Pmon and output Q2. The monopolist is able to charge a higher price restrict total output and thereby reduce welfare because the rise in price to Pmon reduces consumer surplus. 3. Higher prices
A competitive industry will produce in the long run where market demand = market supply. Consider the diagrams below. Equilibrium output and price is at Q1 and Pcomp on the left hand diagram and Pcomp and Q1 on the right hand diagram. At this point, Price = MC and the industry meets the conditions for allocative efficiency.
4. Dead weight welfare loss
Some of this reduction in welfare is a pure transfer to the producer through higher profits, but some of the loss is not reassigned to any other agent. This is known as the deadweight welfare loss or the social cost of monopoly and is equal to the area ABC.
INCREASED EFFICIENCY WHEN THE COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY IS MONOPOLISED
At the same time, the highly competitive industry take s advantage of the following and increases its efficiency.
Economies of Scale
A monopolist might be better placed to exploit increasing returns to scale leasing to an equilibrium that gives a higher output and a lower price than under competitive conditions. This is illustrated in the next diagram, where we assume that the monopolist is able to drive marginal costs lower in the long run, finding an equilibrium output of Q2 and pricing below the competitive price.
Monopoly Profits, Research and Development and Dynamic Efficiency * Patents provide legal protection of an idea or process. Generic patents allow legal copying of a product. * As firms are able to earn abnormal profits in the long run there may be a faster rate of technological development that will reduce costs and produce better quality items for consumers. * Monopoly power can be good for innovation. Despite the fact that the market leadership of firms like Microsoft, Toyota, GlaxoSmithKline and Sony is often criticised, investment in research and development can be beneficial to society because they expand the technological frontier and open new ways to prosperity. Many innovations are developed by firms with patents on ‘leading-edge’ technologies.
Chinese broadband monopolised
Antinti-monopoly case held against two of the country’s biggest broadband providers, China Telecom and China Unicom, in one of China’s more high profile inquiries
China Unicom and China Telecom, the two biggest telecommunications operators in the country, are facing an anti-monopoly investigation by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). The case is related to their actions in the broadband market.
Regulators in China believe the two companies are using their dominant position, together they account for more than two thirds of the entire broadband market, to offer lower prices to non-competitors while charging competitors higher rates.
The deputy director of the Price Supervision and Antimonopoly Department of the NDRC, Li Qing, said in an interview with the government-run China Central Television, “According to the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML), we call such behaviour price discrimination. If we can bring about effective competition to the market, the prices to access the internet could be lowered by 27 percent to 38 percent in five years.”
It is believed that price discrimination has been responsible for low quality connection between the networks of the two companies and also low internet speeds.
According to Li the two companies collectively own bandwidth of 1,078 gigabytes, but they have restricted the amount of bandwidth for connections between the two networks to 261.5 gigabytes.
In addition to this causing low capacity, it also resulted in inefficient inter-connection, says Li. According to official statistics for the first nine months of 2011, the packet loss and inter-connect delay are still way above official requirements. This has had a negative impact on
China’s broadband speed, which is only about one tenth of competing countries, such as Japan, the UK and the USA.
If they are found guilty, both China Unicom and China Telecom could face fines amountingto between one and 10 percent of their annual business turnover. Taking into account that both of these companies have a yearly turnover of more than RMB30 billion, they could face a substantial fine that might amount to several billions of RMB, such is the Chinese government’s current view of monopoly behaviour.
The current Anti-Monopoly Law
(AML) in China is only three years old and there have not been many groundbreaking cases under the new legislation, apart from interventions in a small number of merger cases. However, over recent months the authorities have started to adopt a more hard line approach towards companies that have been found guilty of monopolistic behaviour. The Municipality of Guangdong, for example, quite recently received a hefty fine under AML legislation.
It is clear that China fully recognises the disadvantages of having a monopoly in its telecommunications industry. Indeed, the current investigation into China Telecom and China Unicom is not the first attempt to bring about a more competitive marketplace. As long ago as the 1990s, the creation of China Unicom, itself, was seen as an attempt by the government to establish more competition in the industry.
In a statement released on November 9, China Unicom denied the allegations. The company stated that it had “always provided broadband services strictly in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations.”
EU fines Microsoft again
Lack of browser choice gets Microsoft fined in Europe again after 2009 ruling
The focus of legal battles over competition in the technology industry has shifted back towards Microsoft yet again after the European Union fined it €561m yesterday. Microsoft have been fined for not sticking to a 2009 ruling that instructed them to offer a choice of web browsers after complaints from rivals that said it had been favouring its Internet Explorer software.
It follows many years of heavy criticism towards Microsoft over the way the company bundles its software with its widely-used Windows operating system. In 2004, Microsoft were fined €497m, the largest ever imposed by the EU at the time. Then in 2006 it was fined an additional €280.5m, followed by a €899m fine in 2008. After the ruling in 2009, the company began offering a choice of browsers, including Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, and the Opera browser, but in an update to Windows 7 in early 2011 the choice screen was removed.
Microsoft describe the removal of the screen as a “technical error”, but the EU competition commissioner Joaquin Almunia was adamant that new fine was needed to deter any companies going back on previous rulings. He said: “In 2009, we closed our investigation about a suspected abuse of dominant position by Microsoft due to the tying of Internet Explorer to Windows by accepting commitments offered by the company. A failure to comply is a very serious infringement that must be sanctioned accordingly.”
In response to the fine, Microsoft admitted their mistake in a statement: “We take full responsibility for the technical error that caused this problem and have apologized for it. We provided the Commission with a complete and candid assessment of the situation, and we have taken steps to strengthen our software development and other processes to help avoid this mistake – or anything similar – in the future.”
Recent years have seen a series of courtroom disputes between tech giants, with Apple, Google and Samsung fighting over patent infringements and competition.
http://www.theneweconomy.com/business/eu-fines-microsoft-again
Russia ‘s monopoly over gas supplies
It has been a bit chilly in the UK for the last few days, but nothing compared to the temperatures as low as -35 which have hit parts of central and eastern Europe. Of course, they are used to far colder winters than us, and have different ways of dealing with the weather, but reliance on gas supplies from Russia for the majority of their heating fuel leaves countries including Bulgaria, Serbia and Bosnia vulnerable to disruption in that supply.
Gazprom, the Russian gas export monopoly, said on Friday it was supplying as much gas as it could spare. However, higher demand for the gas in their domestic market means that less is available for export than usual, with a consequent reduction in supply to other countries. An EU spokeswoman has confirmed that there has been a decrease in gas deliveries in various member states - Poland, Slovakia, Austria, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Greece and Italy, and although this is not yet a crisis, it is a notable change.
There have been similar disruptions to supply in the past during particularly cold spells, and notably in 2009 when political tension between Russia and Ukraine led to a cut in supplies to parts of Europe, which pass through Ukraine, for about two weeks. This gives a clear example of some of the wide-ranging negative externalities which can come from monopoly power over such a vital resource.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
1. Discuss using examples from a leisure industry of your choice, the extent to which competition creates efficiency.…
- 1512 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The correct answer is zero profit. You may have read monopolistic competition in the context of monopoly. The monopoly feature of monopolistic competition suggests that firms charge MC = MR, and in this case, P is above MC, so a zero profit as it sets P = MC is incorrect. The competition feature of monopolistic competition suggests that firms enter as long as there is positive profit. As more firms enter, each firm’s demand becomes increasingly flat—more elastic—until P = ATC and profit goes to zero.…
- 998 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The structure of the market in any industry is important. Which market structure is the best is dependent on whether you are the consumer or the provider of the goods or services. In a monopolistically competitive market place there are many firms providing homogenous products meaning there are similar substitutes available which also means the demand curve is more elastic. The economic efficiency and barriers to entry for all practical purposes don’t exist. A normal rate of return in a long run competitive equilibrium results in sufficient earnings to keep owners and investors adequately satisfied (Case, Fair & Oster, 2009, pg. 137). In a monopolistic economic environment you have one firm that controls the entire market place. The barrier to entry is high and profit maximization is usually high. In the potato chip industry in the Northwest, moving from a monopolistically competitive market place to a monopoly has different ramifications for the potato chip manufacturer and the various stakeholders.…
- 1517 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
I do not feel that monopolies are really bad for society. One common argument suggesting they are bad is that they make extra profits. And while it is true that they make extra profit. A monopoly can be inefficient if it not able to perfectly price discriminate. If they can 't price discriminate, some consumer surplus will be lost without a gain to producer surplus because the producer can 't gain a surplus without selling. So, if…
- 623 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
4. Monopolistic competition has few to many competitors and is a little difficult to enter the business because the goods and services they have to offer are similar products to the competitors but differentiated by the brand name and price. The individual firms have some control over the prices, examples of goods and services they offer are sports wear which look the same but have different prices depending on the brand names, local fitness center, etc.…
- 574 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Monopoly is a term to describe an industry where a seller of a product or service does not have a competitor offering a close substitute. The word is derived from the Greek words monos (meaning one) and polein (meaning to sell). Rarely does a pure monopoly exist. In a pure monopoly there is only one company making and selling the item in question; however there can also be the situation where there is one company who has the bulk of sales and the other firms in the same market have little or no impact on the overriding company. Due to lack of competitors, the monopoly company has control of the supply and price of the good or service, unless there is government intervention. The monopoly will continue to make more goods as long as their marginal cost is equal to their marginal revenue. The monopoly will stop selling goods at the point when the next item sold lowers their marginal revenue on the previous goods sold. Because there is no competition the monopoly company has more control in making a profit. In normal business situations this would cause other companies to form and try to get into the same industry hoping to make a profit as well.…
- 2034 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
HOW DID THE FORMATION OF MONOPOLIES AFFECT THE US and ARE MONOPOLIES GOOD OR BAD? Definition: A monopoly is a business that's the only provider of a good or service. That gives it a tremendous competitive advantage over any other company that tries to provide a similar product.…
- 1831 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A pure monopolist faces no immediate competition because certain barriers keep potential competitors from entering the industry. Those barriers may be economic (economic of scale), technological,…
- 594 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The book The Monopolists is above all else about the hidden and untold truth behind the popular and legendary Monopoly. By giving earlier examples of the board game, The Monopolists piece by piece unveils the history of game through its many forms and varieties. It is well implied that the overall goal of the book is to give a complete history, like never told before, of how it came to be. Due to the ambiguous nature of the exact founding and development of the game, the author gives other historical versions that would influence the game we know today, and key players that made Monopoly what it is.…
- 413 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A natural monopoly is said to exist in any market where the costs of production are such that it is less expensive for demand to be met by one firm than it would be for that same demand to be met by more than one firm (Benjamin et al., 2005).…
- 777 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Monopoly power occurs when a business is a dominant seller of a good or service with a market share that exceeds 25%. There are many disadvantages for societies where monopolies exist. A higher price than those in competitive markets is one of the main disadvantages for society. As monopolies are the main seller of goods and services in the market they can use their market power in order to raise the prices well above the marginal cost and thus make supernormal profits. As their prices are set so high and people have little other choice than to pay for them this reduces the amount of consumer surplus income.…
- 744 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
How would you feel if you went shopping and your only options are the awful red Nike shirt or the really bright green Nike shirt, and that both cost 55 dollars? In the early twentieth century, the United States went through one of the most influential changes which impacted economic growth. This change was known as the second economic revolution. This economic growth came with the benefits of abundant resources, an increase in labor, a growing market, and available capital investment. However, with all of this growth, there were also some setbacks. A huge setback was the over growing power of monopolies (Foner, 34 ). “A monopoly is a market structure characterized by a single seller, selling a unique product in the market, with no competition” (The Economist,1). Monopolies, during the Industrial Revolution, were bad because of overpriced items, corruption, and a lack of clothes and apparel.…
- 1027 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Market in which firms can enter freely, each producing its own brand or version of a differentiated product.…
- 569 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In a perfectly competitive market, producers are price-takers and consumers are price-takers. There are many producers, none having a large market share and the industry produces a standardized product, also free entry and exit of the industry. They produce using the optimal output rule: produce where marginal revenue equals marginal cost as Smith (1904) demonstrated.…
- 585 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Notice first the total market demand curve for the industry as a whole. Then notice the marginal cost curve for the competitive fringe of firms. This is a model in which there is one firm which is dominant and then a fringe of small firms who are so small that they behave like perfectly competitive firms – they take the price that is give by the dominant firm (and then set P = MC to profit maximize).…
- 628 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays