What Is Breed-Specific Legislation Against Dogs Necessary?

Is breed-specific discrimination and legislation against dogs really necessary? Many different breeds of dogs are discriminated against simply because of stigmas behind their breeds. Breed-specific legislation applies only to dogs that happen to look a certain way, not to any and all dogs. These types of legislation do not take into account how the owners have raised, trained, or managed their dogs. Legislation of this kind does not take into account the dog’s actual behavior. Imagine being a pet owner to a lovely animal only to have to live with the constant threat of it being taken away simply because of it’s breed. To pet owners around the world, this issue is constantly being discussed and litigated against. Restrictions and bans do much more harm than good.
The topic of Breed-Specific legislation also referred to as “BSL” for short, are any laws “that ban or restricts certain types of dogs based on their appearance, usually because they are perceived as “dangerous” breeds or types of dogs” (stopbsl.org). In most locations, these bans apply to dogs that share a common appearance. These bans are made as a effort to limit attacks against possible victims. These types of legislations do not take into account how owners have trained, raised, of managed the dog while in the owner’s care.
Finding adequate housing that will allow certain dogs to live in these establishments can be hard to find. Completing daily tasks like going for a walk or visiting certain parks or places can also be very limited based on what. The opposition stance against BSL believes that “regardless of the fact that it has proven to not only cause harm to responsible pet owners, but also smear the lines between legal and illegal” (worldofangus.org). Pet owners who have been able to have dogs without any problems should not be hindered due to the fact that other dogs that share a breed with their own dogs have caused possible harm in the