He thought that, physical objects must contain “intentional reality”, in that they possess the qualities of the representation of our ideas, for example, the idea of a tree is in fact intentionally true. But to say that a tree is the cause of this idea, for Descartes, is to say that the tree itself contains “formal reality”, it actually does contain the physical attributes of a tree, such as branches and bark, rather than the mental representation of branches and bark, which are less vivid. Descartes then continued to reason that, nothing which contains formal reality is capable of containing more intentional reality than its cause, as this reality would be existing from nothing, which is …show more content…
To do this, Descartes asked himself, that when we think of physical objects clearly and distinctly in our minds, which properties cannot be separated from the idea of that object. Descartes discovers, that the ideas of the objects do not require properties of: “colour, taste, texture or scent”, but must have the qualities of: “shape, size, is the object in motion, or rest, place”. Therefore, Descartes concludes that the consensus which all these qualities share, is the “extension”, or volume of the material thing. They are, as Descartes puts it, “objects of pure mathematics”. In other words, the three dimensional space of which it occupies in the physical world, which must be the true essence of material