Preview

What Is Ernest Van Den Haag Thesis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
222 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Ernest Van Den Haag Thesis
Ernest van den Haag’s thesis of this work is there are certain things that give way to controversy of the death penalty but that he would prove reasons for it through justification. His main reasons for having this thesis is in the delivery of the death penalty, mistakes made in court in death penalty cases, proof of lack of deterrence, cost complaints, and suffering through degradation. For starters he believes that his argument on its delivery does not fall under certain groups, races, or minorities. It falls under the particular crime and that all humans have a choice in committing that crime. Next, he notes the mistakes made by the court systems of innocent people being charged with crimes they did not commit. Although this is a valid concern,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Admit the patient using critical thinking skills to assess and prioritise nursing interventions related to Audrey’s.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Summary

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the author the modern executioner's job has changed, likewise, the death penalty has also changed. Jeffrey Toobin suggests killing prisoners who are on death row is necessitated but harm should not be caused. The author believes that the death penalty is uncivilized in our civilized society. Toobin also affirms the fact that the death penalty has become unpalatable and gruesome because of the great length's states have gone to come up with other ways of execution. For…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Presented in the book entitled Catcher in the Rye, Holden Caulfield rebels against what life has to offer. Symbolized throughout the book, Holden shows his many dislikes towards the normal actions of a human being. The normal things that take place in society seem to irate Holden. Stated in chapter two, Holden says “People always think something’s all true.” Holden is explaining his frustration of the lack of education towards things people say and do. Holden tends to see the bigger picture, and the smaller details. Also stated in chapter two of Catcher in the Rye, Holden states “People never notice anything.” This also shows Holden’s great attention to detail. Holden notices the little things; he notices the little girl, later on in the book, that is having…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Koch

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his essay, the author includes seven main arguments opposing capital punishment and refutes them. People may find that the death penalty is a barbaric act and Koch argues this point by suggesting that the method of lethal injection is actually quite humane and literally painless. He also argues that although no other democratic country imposes the death penalty as a form of punishment, no other country boasts a murder rate as high as the United States. The author contends with those who believe capital punishment diminishes life’s value by suggesting the contrary. He has found those who are sentenced to death have been judged fairly and with a great deal of examination. Koch then refutes the argument of capital punishment as a state-sanctioned murder by acknowledging that the state holds much different rights and responsibilities than the individual.…

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, we revisit the late Van den Haag's challenge. Assessing the pros and cons of the death penalty and how Ernest van den Haag feels it’s morally justified. Research results revealed that the death penalty is deemed cruel and unusual punishment to some members of society and an act of justice to others. Thinking at a high level it easy to say that punishment for the sake of punishment is never a good idea; what is the point of incarcerating a person if they do something wrong. This is reflected in the retributivist statement, “eye for and eye”. It really serves no purpose except for the feelings of those who’ve been hurt. This essay will also discuss how Haag uses retributivism to justify the death penalty and capital punishment.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers do deserve nothing less than a death for themselves and that although everyone is born with the right to live, criminals lose these rights at the moment when they take away the rights of another human and only by punishing them in such way, the society is affirming the value which is placed on the victim’s right to live.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    death) is distributed, is of little importance compared to the benefits reaped by the punishments; essentially downplaying the tragedy of an innocent man being put to death. While there is a certain logic to this argument, and I can not refute its necessity in a complex and civilized society, it begs the question "Which is worse, for a murderer to kill an innocent man or for the government to kill an innocent man?" Van den Haag then continues to state that if one innocent life is saved by the execution of a convicted one, then the death penalty is just—a rather brash statement, and for multiple reasons. First, Van den Haag has clearly taken a Utilitarian approach to the death penalty, assuming that all or most convicts are in fact guilty and in such a case the death penalty would be just. The problem is there is no way to literally calculate the amount of happy and sad points without some sort of biased arbitration (how many sad points does an innocent man killed by the government earn?). Second, there is no statistical evidence of any kind, that execution is a more effective deterrent than life in prison or any other punishment—and given the finality of death, imprisoning a man for life seems a much more prudent option. And so, as a modern, complex, civilized, scientific society, with no evidence to support the claim that the death penalty prevents crime any better than life in prison, why should we gamble with the life of a potentially innocent man, when we may imprison him and statistically be just as…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ernest Van den Haag strongly contends the need for capital punishment in our society in his article. Van den Haag provides a substantial amount of convincing facts and information to support “The Ultimate Punishment”. Van den Haag discusses such topics as maldistribution, deterrence to society, miscarriages of the penalty, and incidental and political issues (cost, relative suffering, and brutalization). The death penalty is indeed the harshest/ultimate punishment a convicted criminal can receive in our society. I agree with Van den Haag’s article. I am in favor of the death penalty system in the United States. Through capital punishment’s determent process, I feel it is a necessary and effective tool in implementing a type of ultimatum to basic life in our legal system. The ethical theory of consequentialism is often referred with capital punishment. Consequentialism mainly points out the benefits of the death penalty to society, like deterrence.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oedipus Tragic Hero

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The foundations of Greek tragedy were laid down by the philosopher Aristotle in his famous "Poetics" which discussed the characteristics of a tragic hero. In this composition of philosophy and literary theories, Aristotle's ideas revolve around three crucial effects to audience members. First, the audience must develop an emotional attachment to the tragic hero. Next, the audience must fear what may befall the hero. Finally, once misfortune strikes, the audience pities the suffering hero. Clearly, for Aristotle's theory to succeed, the tragic hero must be a complex and well-constructed character, as is seen in Sophocles' Oedipus the King. Like any tragic hero, Oedipus elicits the three needed responses from the audience far better than most.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has been used around the world for many thousands of years as a way of enforcing justice when someone has done wrong by what standards that the cultures have. Over the past few centuries capital punishment has started to be questioned by many people in Europe and in the United States. Many people who support the death penalty cite reasons such as deterrence and not wanting to spend money a person who will never be a productive member of society again. Many who are in opposition to the death penalty say that the death penalty is killing innocent people and is actually not saving any money at all and that it is in fact costing too much and that it is wrong to simply kill someone who commits a crime. There are also questions to the fairness of the death penalty and many who question if it is being applied fairly. Both sides of the debate over the morality and legitimacy of capital punishment will be presented in this paper with this author taking one side. While the thought of having someone put to death is not something that anyone would like, the death penalty is the only way for ultimate justice to be administered for victims provided that it is fairly administered.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment has been a topic that has been talked about for ages. It has been an issue in the adjudication process since the first execution took place in the United States of America in 1608 (Schneider & Smykia, 1991). Today, cases are being brought before the courts constantly, and they are forced to decide what exactly is “cruel and unusual punishment” in accordance with the eighth amendment. This paper will be looking at how the death penalty has evolved and developed in the United States. It will also be evaluating the effects of the death penalty and looking at the issues that are being faced today in regards to capital punishment. Also, does the death penalty have a place in the future for America?…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gavrila utilizes the statistical data and policy interpretation of the capital punishment model which is extremely pertinent to my research paper. Within it, the author describes the growing trend towards a capital punishment while also looking at the policies of the 23 countries still utilizing capital punishment as a punishment method. An in-depth analysis of human rights laws and religious arguments are analyzed along with statistical data from organizations such as the United Nations and Amnesty International. This is an important paper for my utilization as the data is relevant and up to date and it explores the ethical issues of capital punishment while also putting to rest several arguments used by proponents of the capital punishment model. Above all else, this paper provides me with a clear and concise argument favoring the abolishment of capital punishment as a means of punishment for criminal offenders.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays