Preview

What Is Hobbes View On Human Nature

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Hobbes View On Human Nature
I agree with Hobbes point of view because I believe human nature is naturally “evil”, he states “Civil society is the application of force by the state to uphold contracts and so forth.” He’s saying, without the social contract that people are morally obligated to withhold, we would follow our human nature to simply do as we please.

The definition of human nature is “The general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, shared by all humans.” Hobbs had a negative point of view on human nature, he believed our natural human tendency is to be “nasty and brutal…” He believed “without subjection to a common power, men are necessarily at war”. For example, without the guidelines of government telling us how we
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract

    According to Rousseau, the civil society is what represses people’s freedom who argues that people’s freedoms are better secured in the state of nature. This point of view sharply contrasts with that of Hobbes who sees the state of nature as one of constant battles. Hobbes sees a civil society as the most ideal way of ensuring that collective freedoms are preserved.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes: A Basis For Politics
    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page

    Thomas Hobbes: A Basis For Politics

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for

    Sadly, I think Hobbes is correct, though clearly he was writing in the abstract. While all people do have within them elements of both good and bad, as The Osmond Brothers said so succinctly in the 1970's, "one bad apple can spoil the whole darn bunch." Even if 99.99% of the population was good, pure, philanthropic, and just, it only takes one "evil" individual to upset everything. As Hobbes pointed out – everyone must make a singular commitment to have freedom from the natural condition.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke
    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes and Enlightenment Ideas
    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes and Enlightenment Ideas

    Thomas Hobbes contribution was the suggestion that the social order was made by human beings and therefore could be changed by human beings. Hobbes looked on the individual as selfish, concerned with self-preservation, searching for power, and (potentially at least) at war with others. For Hobbes, in the state of nature, there was a war of all against all and life is nasty, brutish, and short. Since individuals are rational, they agree to surrender their individual rights to the sovereign in order to create a state whereby they can be protected from other individuals. Locke and Rousseau further developed this idea of a social contract, although in a somewhat different form than Hobbes.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Debate on Human Nature and How it Should Play in This Role- Hammurabi
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Debate on Human Nature and How it Should Play in This Role- Hammurabi

    -Human nature refers to the distinguishing characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling and acting that humans tend to have naturally, independently of the influence of culture.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato - Ideal of the Examined Life
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato - Ideal of the Examined Life

    Human nature is the distinguished characteristics, ways of thinking, feeling and acting that each human has. These characteristics are shaped by the people and environment surrounding us and they are what completely prevent us from following one model or one concept of perfection.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke
    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes vs Locke

    Thomas Hobbes believed mankind good and evil depended on what the individual loved and hated. He believed that life in the state of nature is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." (119) Mankind was naturally equal in power of mind and body so no individual was capable of dominating another. In a strictly natural condition there was no justice or injustice because everyone had their right to seek and take whatever is good and dispose of whatever was bad for them. He was for absolute monarchy. Thomas Hobbes believed that “authoritarian governments were necessary to keep human beings’ worst impulses under control.”(119) He did not believe that a large group of men would agree with one and other and peacefully run a country. Hobbes opposed constitutionalism because of his pessimistic view of human nature. The passages in Hobbes writings show that he did not desire the possibility of anything like modern totalitarianism. For Hobbes, any division of power was an invitation to chaos.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Importance of Being on Time in the Military
    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Importance of Being on Time in the Military

    Hope that you all thoroughly enjoyed the last lazy days of summer, and have settled into the cool, crisp, weather of fall. We traded baseball and softball games for football and soccer, and fall softball leagues, so we still have no rest around here! Our men and women’s basketball and volleyball seasons are in full swing at the college, so almost 5 or 6 nights a week, I get to watch somebody play some kind of “ball”! I guess that’s what keeps me going! Was able to have a nice visit in October with Allan and Dot Brennecke and Bill Brenecke in St. Louis. Aunt Marilyn and I took a road trip to see them and we hope that you all enjoy the many photos they shared for this edition, and some to go in the January edition. I have some excerpts from letters written by Ed Brennecek, Allan and Bill’ father, to their mother before they were married. Ed mentions Pete French several times in his letters from 1918 anyone have a few tales on Pete? I know he is related to Erma (Harding) Merrill on her mom’s side. I can barely remember him as a kid, seems like the school we Merrill kids rode went by their house.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature in the Great Gatsby
    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human Nature in the Great Gatsby

    Human nature refers to the general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans. F. Scott Fitzgerald with the use of selection of detail, selective diction, and imagery, portrays both condescending and bona fide aspects of human nature.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is The State Of Nature A Hobsian State Of War Of All Against All

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Is The State Of Nature A Hobsian State Of War Of All Against All

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Individual Rights and Freedoms
    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Individual Rights and Freedoms

    The source given discusses the prominence of the commonly debatable topic of individual rights and freedoms being neglected to fulfill the goals of the state. The source is clearly biased and against modern liberalism; in favor of a more collective society focusing more on the survival and prosperity of the state, rather than individual rights and freedoms. The source evidently identifies collectivism as well as authoritarianism as its most prominent ideological perspectives. If this source was a legitimate society in today’s world it would undoubtedly reject the natural rights of individuals as well as rule of law, egalitarianism along with the general will of the people. This can be most strongly supported by the following sentence stating, “The individual must serve the interests of a state.” The evidence taken from the source depicts a very strong presence of an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. This type of a society most commonly resembles the life in the medieval period, where everything and anything was used to benefit the state before benefitting its people, due to the divine right of the kings, which left no room for individual worth. The source states “Individual rights and freedoms are less important that the survival and prosperity of the state”, this is an excellent example of the thinking of the early English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Hobbes believed that people are motivated by selfishness and greed, to avoid disorder and turmoil; he thought people should give up their freedom to a government that will ensure order, which this government would be strong and able to suppress rebellion. The thinking of Thomas Hobbes and the source, both disagree with liberalism. Both Hobbes and the source given prefer the people of a society to peacefully hand in their rights, so that one single body of government can lead to the progressivism of the state through reform…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crash Human Nature
    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crash Human Nature

    * Human nature is The general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioural traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes View Of The State Of Nature
    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page

    Thomas Hobbes View Of The State Of Nature

    Hobbes credits to each person in the state of nature a liberty right to preserve herself, which he terms “the right of nature”. This is the right to do whatsoever one sincerely judges requiring for one's protection; yet because it is at least possible that virtually anything might be judged necessary for one's protection, this hypothetically limited right of nature becomes in practice an unlimited right to potentially anything, or, as Hobbes puts it, a right “to all things”. Hobbes further assumes that people should accept what they see to be the necessary means to their most important ends.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics