What Is Hume's Argue With Skepticism?

Hume’s appeals to human nature in order to explain knowledge, but his writings are more about discrediting the common beliefs and replacing them with skepticism. Hume accounts for human’s believing in cause and effect because of the habit that comes from common experiences, and not too dissimilar is his explanation for the existence of necessary connections, which he believes is due to our ability to examine enough similar instances to call something a connection. Hume does not provide anything that stands out as outrageous because he simply explains the way humans work, but his critic of our habits is influential to most who read it.
Hume begins his inquiry by mentioning that human reason may be divided into relations of ideas and matters of fact; the former are the sciences which covers every affirmation that is demonstratively
Hume’s solution allows for connections to be made improperly because the only standard for creating a connection is if there are enough similar instances. The standard for connections that Hume tries to apply to cause and effects can only be applied to certain things that can be replicated through multiple instances which limits what can actually be determined as a connection. This solution incites disputes regarding what is connected and what is simply conjoined. Hume would respond that his solution may not have an exact threshold but when it is properly applied to the correct cause and effect then it can be determined how much utility can come from that particular event (563). People need to be determine connections because it will help prevent future generations from making mistakes. A threshold was not determined by Hume because it is different for nearly every cause and effect. Hume believes his solution has a certain amount of ambiguity but if it is applied properly there should not be a