West Civ II
March 20, 2012
What’s the ISM?
What’s the meaning of ism? Ism is used to form uncount nouns that refer to political or religious movements and beliefs. It is also used to form uncount nouns that refers to attitudes and behaviors. For example, Buddhism, nationalism, heroism and pacifism are all ism. Ism is also used to form nouns that refer to unfair or illegal discrimination against particular groups of people. Examples of this discrimination based on racism, sexism, and disability. The political history of the western world begins with the rise of statism, goes through the age of absolute monarchism, building up to the French Revolution and the rise of nationalism. An analysis of the
Western world reveals “isms” helped define, mold and shape their culture.
Lets begin with Statism. Statism is defined, according to Merriam Webster, as concentration of economic controls and planning in the hands of a highly centralized government often extending to government ownership of industry. In the western world, we see rise of this beginning with the Mongol Empire. The Mongol Empire was the largest contiguous land empire in human history. From 1206 – 1297, the empire was unstoppable. This couldn’t have been done without the Khans. Beginning with Genghis Khan in 1206 through 1337 with Toghan Temur Khan, they conquest Central Asian steppes, Eastern Europe to the Sea of Japan, covering large parts of Siberia into Southeast Asia, Indian Subcontinent and the Middle East. Genghis did govern a code of law for the empire, which was called Yassa. Under Yassa, chiefs and generals were selected based on merits, Religious tolerance was guaranteed, and thievery and vandalizing of civilian property was strictly forbidden, those of ranks shared much of the same hardships as the common man. Penalties were also imposed; death penalty was decreed if one mounted a solider following another did not pick up something dropped from the mount in front. Penalties were also decreed for rape and to some extent for murder. The Mongol empire very tightly disciplined which made the empire extremely safe and well ran. The Mongol empire was the foundation of statism for the western world. For the most part, the Khan was the central government of the empire. The way they conquered and governed their empire was repeated through out history, with little changes here and there.
Next we’ll move into absolute monarchism. Absolutism was a political theory that encouraged rulers to claim complete sovereignty within their territories. An absolute monarch could make law, dispense justice, create and direct a bureaucracy, declare war and levy taxation, without the approval of any other governing body. Louis XIV was determined to demonstrate that the power of central monarch was absolute. It is claimed that Louis was disturbed. As a child, Parisians entered his bedroom and Louis witnessed the intrusion as a horrid affront not only to his own person but also to the majesty of the French state he personified, According to the textbook. He reigned from 1643-1751. During his time he pursed such a policy on many fronts, asserting his power over the nobility, the clergy and the provincial courts. This made Louis have total control. They had no other choice but to look to him to guarantee their interests, and their own power became more closely connected with the sacred aura of the monarchy itself. On the other hand, Absolutism’s promise of stability, prosperity and order was the most appealing, especially compared to the disorder of the “iron century” that preceded it. Fundamental to Louis's theater of power was the display of monarchical wealth, power, and largesse. To this end, he moved the monarchical residence out of the center of Paris to a suburb in Versailles. There he built the single most opulent palace ever built for a king of Europe: the palace of Versailles. It was an awe-inspiring structure and was built as a stage on which to perform the public rituals and to display monarchical power. Louis also required all the nobles to spend time at the Versailles. He would have performances and rituals designed to show the nobility his power. In order to secure his power, Louis had to centralize the military, take control of national taxes, reign in independent territories, break up the legislative assemblies, and imposed a religious unity on the country. Louis did all of these to not only display his control but to also maintain it. Without the control over taxes, the nobles and territories, Louis would have not been able to keep his reign. Everyone and everything under him was his foundation. Without them, he would have failed.
There are many causes of the French Revolution. International struggles for hegemony and Empire outstrips the fiscal resource of the state. Political conflicts between the Monarchy and the nobility over the “reform” of the tax system led to bankruptcy. The Enlightenment was a cause because it intensified political conflicts and also went against traditional aristocratic constitutionalism. Also, Conflicts between aristocracy and the bourgeoisie, Louis XVI and economic hardships were causes too. The French King Louis XVI was very unpopular. He was an ineffective monarch and France wasn’t doing well. France was in very bad debt, so the peasants who made up 98 % of the population had to pay higher taxes while the aristocracy and clergy paid NO taxes. Most of the French debt was because they helped American against Britain during there revolution. This gave the French the idea of fighting against there monarchy. The Revolution started in 1789 and overthrew Louis XVI and his unpopular Austrian wife Marie-Antoinette. The guillotine executed them. A man called Maximiellien Robspierre hijacked the revolution and killed millions by the guillotine during the Reign of Terror. Robspiere was later killed the gulliotine. Eventually Napoleon would take control of France. The French Revolution brought together the people as a nation. Once Napoleon took power, he made France a powerful nation again. He stabilized the government and threw his military conquests he conquered more land for France. A new sense of nationalism arose as Frenchmen began to again think of them as one of the super powers of the world, along with Great Britain. The poverty lessened and the disparity between the two classes shifted for the better. Napoleon made all people equal before the law regardless of whether someone was of royal blood or peasant. By reopening the Louvre and bringing hundreds of famous painting and other works of art, he inspired national pride. The Grande Armee was created by Napoleon and was made up of French citizens. French soldiers marching and fighting across Europe, spreading the ideas of the revolution, winning great victories inspired much nationalism in France.
Statism helped shape Western Culture. Absolute Monarchism helped rule Western Culture. The French Revolution helped redefine France, while Nationalism help rejuvenate the love the French have for their country.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
When the Mongols moved into china and Persia they immediately took over the political structures at the top. The smartest and most loyal Mongols took the highest position in political structures. The political structure of both was a dominating force squashing rebellions when necessary. Also In both Native Mongols always were the strongest political figures. They both took control of the political structures because it let them be in control and know what’s happening around the empire. Both Mongols in Persia and china at the top of political structures strongly…
- 501 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Many who felt this way spent time in the capital city, seeing the huge empire function firsthand. The idea that Genghis Khan was a bringer or order and peace is evident, as shown by the Khan’s shaman, (Doc. 1). However, the shaman may have been influenced by his elite position in contact with the Khan himself. Writing in a book that was public, he may have intentionally praised Genghis Khan as a peace-bringer, as it could help advance his own position in the eyes of the Khan. Not only native Mongols, but also European visitors viewed the Mongols as a well-organized, productive force. The Mongols had an impressive system of accountability in the military, (Doc. 3) and good law enforcement in the cities, (Doc. 5). These statements indicate the belief that Mongol government was both just and disciplined. Lastly, some Muslims also held the Mongols in esteem for their good government, describing how it was possible to travel far and wide in their territories without fear of robbery, (Doc. 8). People in contact with and conquered by the Mongols were not only impressed by their ability to organize and provide peace to their empire, they were impressed by the vast wealth of the Mongols, as…
- 843 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
After the rise to power of Genghis Khan in the early 13th century, Mongolian politics were adapted to rule the vast empire they now controlled. At the head of the system was the Great Khan who held absolute power; to ensure this power, Genghis replaced former leaders with loyal military commanders, created army divisions made up of diverse tribal and ethnic groups, and implemented an imperial guard of specialized soldiers…
- 71 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In the years between 1100 and 1400 the Mongol empire stretched the farthest of any empire throughout history. Within the massive land under Mongol rule laid the lands of China and Russia. The Mongols knew how to maintain their empire but had different ways of doing it in each part. This lead to the separate, divergent ways of governing the two lands. In China and Russia, the Mongol era brought an immense change in political and economical power.…
- 384 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Mongols, created by Genghis Khan, is perceived by some as a brutal and uncivilized culture. They are known to carry out treacherous massacres as they conquered parts of Asia and Eastern Europe. However, this perception is false because the Mongols were a very much rather civilized culture. A civilized culture can be defined as having advancements in society, being well organized, and having the ability to prosper. Organization of a society allows for more time and an easier way for the economy to prosper making them even more advanced.…
- 1135 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Mongol leaders also contributed greatly to their success. Khan (known as Great Khan), the very powerful military leader, didn’t tolerate the defiance of others “if you do not obey the command of Heaven, and run counter to our orders we shall know that you are our foe,” (Doc: 9). This statement is a response to the Pope, another powerful leader. The Pope recognizes the force which Khan is using “with a fury still unabated you do not cease from breaking the bonds of natural ties, sparing neither sex nor age, you rage against all indiscriminately with the sword of chastisement” (Doc: 8). This reestablishes the brutal force that Khan is using to benefit himself by leaving no survivors to spread information or become his enemies. Chinggis Khan was also a brutal leader, “he sent soldiers out against those of…
- 522 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In conclusion, the Mongols were considered barbaric. They had high murder tolls, participated in the destruction of villages, and in the destruction of marriages. They believed in taking control of everything, and killing the people who didn’t follow what they did and believed in. They could have been called a Communist government, but really there was no need for a government for people who killed for world…
- 533 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Mongols were a nomadic people until 1206, when they acknowledged Temujin as the supreme leader, Genghis Khan. A huge empire was created under his rule, linking Eastern and Western Eurasia. An analysis of these documents will discuss the topic of how the Mongols expanded their empire so far in such a short time through their power of violence. This analysis will also show the admiration and respect of the Mongols by others in surrounding regions. Ultimately, this analysis will discuss how the fear from other people gave the Mongols their biggest advantage in conquering other regions to expand their enormous empire.…
- 999 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Albert Dunlap was known for turning around badly shaped companies into profitable companies. Through his radical restructuring and downsizing methods, he created shareholder value. At Scott Paper, Dunlap fired 35% of all the employees and 71% of the corporate staff raising the stock price from $38.00 to $120.00 and sold the company to Kimberly Clark for more than $6B. Due to his past success, Al Dunlap was hired to turn around Sunbeam. Sunbeam had a long period of management and financial instability. In other words, Sunbeam needed a “savior.” Many believed this was Al Dunlap. Unfortunately, through his tenure at Sunbeam, stock price fell from a high $53.00 to $16.00 on the day that he was fired. Were his “rightsizing” techniques not adequate? or was he just an overpaid CEO?…
- 1394 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Many different people have studied and observed the Mongols throughout history. Ruled by Genghis Khan, they were an empire that sought out and conquered whatever they could. Throughout their reign, many different opinions began to form about it. Through these different attitudes,it can be seen that some viewed the Mongols as a admirable and respectful empire while other saw them as deceiving and ruthless.…
- 541 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
''I began writing at the age of 12 when my form master presented me with a challenge instead of detention for bad behaviour. The challenge was, '3,500 words on the life of baked beans inside their tin . . . Cross & Blackwell Beans.' My form master was the Swansea poet and artist Alan Perry, my absolute mentor and I have written ever…
- 64 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The Mongols lived in the 13th century and known for having one of the largest connected land mass empire. But throughout Asia and Europe, they have a reputation for being a fearsome tribe and a threat to civilizations and their people. They also have some “customs” within their own nation that would earn them the title of “barbarians.” Despite these actions, their empire was actually quite civilized and well thought out.…
- 568 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Document 1 shows that Genghis Khan, a Mongolian leader, conquered 4,860,000 square miles of land. Genghis Khan also made sure that every soldier had someone in charge of them, allowing no room for mistakes. He organized the army in a way that every ten people had a ¨captain of ten¨ and every 10 of these captains had a ¨captain of a hundred¨ and so on (Doc 2). If they did not obey one of their leaders or tried to run away, they would be killed (Doc 2). This shows how the leader did not allow any room for disorder and showed no mercy for even his own army. Document 5 shows the Mongolian leader, Genghis Khan, in action executing a prisoner. He and his soldiers were so Barbaric, they would execute on spot and burn people alive while hanging upside down. Genghis was very strict and forbidded theft and adultery of Mongols. They would not even steal two horses running astray with the owners already moved out of the country because of how strict the laws were on theft (Doc 7). Mongke Khan, also a Mongolian leader, made his profession to of faith to Rubruck and declared that all Mongols believe there is one God (Doc 9). In document 10 about Adultery, it shows again how Genghis Khan was strict on is policies of committing adultery, which says they will be executed if they have had previous convictions or…
- 871 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Though the Mongols were very crude and unsophisticated people at war or while they were conquering other lands, in their own towns they had their own law and own little makeshift civilization set up. They all followed a religion under what the Khan of the time period decided the dominant religion would be, and all believed in the one or multiple gods that religion told them to believe in. (document nine) This was very hypocritical of them though, since they were constantly changing the dominant religion of the empire, causing and forcing people to not only believe in one god, but in all of the gods that they decided to worship from time to time. They also had a very severe set of laws against stealing (document seven) and being a thief, but when it came down to conquering other lands, and going into somewhere that wasn’t there they had no issues whatsoever in stealing another man’s land, or another man’s life. They would parade into someone else’s home, with a set plan of conquering a land and how they were going to do it, and it seemed as if they always wanted to take the most brutal of routes. In war, the Mongols didn’t have one constant army on their front lines, they worked their armies in shifts, so that no one man was out for so long that he could get seriously fatigued and weak. Once battle began, they would send a little body of captives out, to face the opposing…
- 1071 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Genghis Khan’s legacy is one of the most well known. They are known for their large empire that stretched across Eurasia. They were brutal and violent, but somehow it worked out and they obtained one of the largest empires in the world and what is now known as the second greatest empire to ever exist (after the Roman Empire of course). The most important aspect of the Mongolian Empire’s legacy was the strength of the military organization, along with their superior archery skills and their tactics.…
- 518 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays