Preview

What Is John Stuart Mill's Understanding Of Freedom

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
541 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is John Stuart Mill's Understanding Of Freedom
Mill's understanding of freedom values the desires and goals of the each individual in a community. He states that "the only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good, in our own way." By this, Mill is saying that freedom should guarantee liberty of rights based on personal interests and desires; it is evident that he puts a significant emphasis on individuality. Mill demonstrates that people should be allowed to do whatever they want by stating that states do not have the legitimate power to limit the freedom of its people, as long as it does not violate the harm principle. The reason why Mill endorses individual diversity is because he believes that the will of a society only reflects the will of politically active members of the society; this goes back to his criticism of a government with the tyranny of the majority. To sum up, Mill's understanding of freedom as allowing people to "pursue their own good in their own ways" results from his emphasis on individualism and harm principle while rejecting the idea of the majority rule. …show more content…
Another reason why Rousseau would disapprove of Mill's understanding of freedom is because Rousseau believes that people should prioritize the good of the society as a whole. Moreover, he argues that, although people have to give up some of their physical freedom, they can enjoy liberty more by trying to contribute to the achievement of the general will. Therefore, Rousseau would criticize Mill's idea of freedom as allowing people to pursue their own goals because Rousseau values the presence of social contracts and endorses the idea of the general

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mill begins his essay by expressing a concern with the amount of control that society can exert over an individual 's liberty. Mill is afraid of the "the tyranny of the majority"1 and suggests that one should protect himself not only from the tyranny of the state itself, but also from the prevailing opinions of the majority. He says that the opinions of the majority become the rules and laws…

    • 2441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From John Stuart Mill’s perspective, Mill can perceive this controversy in a few ways, but for the sake of this argument, we will focus on his main idea of liberalism to further critique Harper’s assertions. Mill’s principle of liberalism can be seen with dealings of society as the sole end for which mankind is authorized, as individuals and collectively, to not interfere with the liberty of action of their fellow citizens, and to subject themselves to the law in order for this protections, which is exercised through coercion and fear. In Mill’s perspective, religion and religious clothing is acceptable insofar that it doesn’t harm another person or the state, morally and physically. But to Harper this can be seen as harm to the values of…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history philosophers have introduced new ideas and belief systems into society in hopes to better the world they lived in. Many philosophers have introduced ideas that are still in practice in American government. While popular belief among those trying to pave a path forward was that government, as it stood, was tyrannical and overly restrictive, however John Stuart Mill believed that through government happiness and freedom can be achieved.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Mill's perspective, oppression of the dominant part is more regrettable than oppression of government in light of the fact that it is not constrained to a political capacity. The predominant feelings inside of society will be the premise of all tenets of behavior inside of society. In this manner there can be no protection in law against the oppression of the larger part. The greater part assessment may not be the right supposition. The main avocation for a man's inclination is the individual’s inclination itself whenever a specific good conviction is the situation. Individuals will adjust themselves either for or against this issue. To analyze the examination of past governments, Mill recommends a solitary standard for which a man's freedom may be limited and that the main reason for which authority can be legitimately practiced over any individual from an civilized group, without wanting to, will be to prevent harms to others. Consequently, when it is not helpful, it may be…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill vs Dworkin

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "I forego any advantage which could be derived to my argument from the idea of abstract right as a thing independent of utility. I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions; but it must be utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being". Mill does not argue that liberty is a right but rather that giving people liberty has beneficial consequences. Mill thinks that paternalism does not serve the utilitarian purpose (to provide the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people) because the extent that “the most ordinary man or woman” knows about him or herself “immeasurably surpassing” anyone else. Any effort from the state to interfere, even from good intention, tends to lead to “evil” rather than good, since no one knows or cares more about his own interest than himself. As a result, “Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest”. The state should not interfere at all, except for when the act can harm others (Mill’s Harm Principle).…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pleasures and pain contribute in determining the classification of one’s actions. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences are significant in determining the results of one’s actions.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Topic: "The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it” (John Stuart Mill, On Liberty).…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Final Exam Study guide

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages

    -The idea advanced by John Mill that a society should only concern itself with actions that pose a direct harm to others.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Shared Humanity

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill feels strongly about people being free to express their opinions. There are a few reasons Mill states of why it is so important to society and for shared humanity. First off it is healthy for the human mind individually. Shared humanity is about being there for others and being kind for no reason. So by listening and helping and individual feel great mentally, it shows that is important to shared humanity. If people were not to listen or deny people of their right to express their…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I understand that his liberty links individual and self-improvement freedom. Therefore, I think his liberal political theory from scientific method on utilitarianism theory. Furthermore, Mill's point of economic philosophy was one of free market depending on his liberalism theory. Mill promoted economic democracy instead of capitalism, a labour cooperate.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    S. Mill, the only and liable reason for interfering into other people’s lives is if they do harm to others. This principle is very common and applied principle in many social and political settings. A supporter of many unacceptable issues in our society refers to this principle if they get into an argument of such nature. Drug legalization supporters often take shelter under this principle of J.S. Mill’s.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill was considered a Utilitarian. The philosophy of Utilitarianism is that an action should be decided by what is best for society. Mill’s philosophy was in part developed by his upbringing as a child. His childhood was restricted and he was raised in an enviroment where is emotionally needs were not met. Also his father was a friend of Jeremy Bentham. Bentham was a philosopher credited with starting the beginings of the Utiltarianism philosophy. He focused on the relationships between the social classes and working towards social reform. His philosophy focused more on social conditions and human behavior than previous philosophies had. He looked at practical solutions for societies problems and less on the metaphysical aspects…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The foundation of this viewpoint is the harm principle, which serves as a focal point for the competing ideologies of tolerating diversity, rejecting oppressive traditions, and accepting diversity. This principle maintains personal freedom while guaranteeing the welfare of the community by suggesting that society should not interfere as long as an individual's actions do not hurt others. According to Mill, this strategy is essential for creating a society in which a diversity of beliefs and ways of living are not only tolerated but also encouraged. Mill's conception of liberty advocates for a kind of freedom that is both socially and personally gratifying, going beyond simple independence from constraints. Mill challenges the difference between individuality and conformity, diversity and unity, by seeing individual liberty and…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Js Mills Conformity

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In “Principles of Political Economy & On Liberty,” J.S. Mills states that you have as much liberty as is consistent with other people therefore humans are inherently individuals. You are free to do what you please and to pursue your own idea of the good, so long as you do not harm another or prevent them from pursuing their good. Humans are naturally individuals, which is good because it is essential to the cultivation of the self. A basic problem that Mill sees with society is that individual spontaneity is not respected as having any good in itself, and is not seen as essential to well-being. Mills writes that in early stages of society, it is possible that there could be too much individuality.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays