Preview

What Is Nasser's Response To British Imperialism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
810 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Nasser's Response To British Imperialism
King Abdullah of Jordan and Nasser of Egypt both responded to British influence and colonialism by creating a nation, separate from Britain, that run on the same western and modernized principles with the hope of creating a reputation for themselves as a nation equal to Britain and other western nations. The British presence and control in Egypt caused Nasser to oust this foreign presence in attempt to create his own Egyptian nation, run only by the people of Egypt. Similarly, King Abdullah, after heading the Great Arab Revolt of the Ottoman Empire that the British urged him to start, planned to create a large Arab Kingdom, centered in Jordan, with a fair, westernized governmental system. Nasser, an Egyptian citizen who later became president, …show more content…

The British were bringing their culture into the country of Egypt, while heavily taxing the Egyptian people. Although Egypt seemed to be running its own country under Farouk, in actuality the British were in control of the country of Egypt. Nasser’s response to this, was to oust the British. The first step in doing so, was taking the Suez Canal back. The Egyptian people built the Suez Canal with their own hands—many died in the process—but the British had taken it as their own. The act of taking it back as the property of Egypt, gave the Egyptian people a national identity centered around the hard-work that their Egyptian ancestors had put into the Suez Canal, that was now theirs again. This was instrumental in separating the Egyptians from the British, because the Suez Canal gave the Egyptian people something to call their own whereas before, the British were in control of everything. Nasser also gave Egypt its own strong and independent army, that was before lead by a British general. This again showed Egypt emerging as a nation that was equal to the British, and other western nations. When he became president, Nasser …show more content…

When Lawrence of Arabia and the British convinced Abdullah to lead the Great Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Empire—to ensure that the Ottomans would not take back Egypt and other Middle Eastern countries that they had colonized—they sparked a nationalist disposition in Abdullah. After the Great Arab Revolt agains the Ottomans subsided, Abdullah was offered the kingship of Iraq, but he declined and became the leader of Transjordan. Contrary to the situation in Egypt, the British presence in Transjordan was not as prominent. However, the British still prevented Abdullah from having full control over his nation. As the leader of Transjordan, Abdullah set out to eliminate the archaic tribal governmental system, and create a westernized constitutional monarchy, drafting a constitution and electing a parliament. This marked the beginning of his separation from the British as his own strong nation. Abdullah also created a strong army for Transjordan, called the Arab Legion and began working to create international legitimacy for his country. He began negotiating with British to create his own independent nation, which finally occurred with the Anglo-Transjordanian treaty. As the leader of an independent nation, Abdullah changed the name of the nation from Transjordan to Jordan in attempt to further separate it from British control. Although Abdullah was assassinated before he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    2. Many people converted to Islam and there was a certain amount of political unity given by the Abbasid Dynasty but that was soon destroyed, causing North Africa to split into several divided states and contending states. Islam preached egalitarianism which made the people acknowledge conquerors and new rulers more easily. Additionally, Islam’s practice of combining the powers of the state and…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Gifts of the Nile”: Herodotus said Egypt was “the gift of the Nile” because of Egypt’s advantages over the floods from the Nile. With the floods, Egypt became a very productive agricultural region.…

    • 3713 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the subtitle “Orthodoxy as ‘Objectivity” of “Thinking About Empire” Michael Parenti argues that all opinions are not of the same value, and the more entrenched the orthodox view becomes, the more irrelevant evidence will be.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Troops were withdrawn and replaced by the UN. Causing Britain to be under pressure “Britain's declining status was highlighted and its Prime Minister - Anthony Eden - resigned”. Because of this resignment, Egypt had the authority to regain their Canal. Proceeding with the Suez was popular to British in the public “the humiliation caused by the conflict, the government rapidly lost the support of the country.” This resulted in British loss in efforts to achieve their proceeding goals towards the Suez Crisis.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pharaohs ordered the construction of a canal between the Nile River and the Red Sea…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    George....

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If the Hyksos did not control Egypt for thirty years, Egypt would have never been as successful as they were after the Hyksos was expelled from the throne. During their control, Hyksos absorbed Egypt’s native ways, and maintained their institutions while also adopting their language. At the time, Egyptians viewed Hyksos’s as foreigners, and after three decades of fighting them off, Hyksos was expelled from Egypt by Kamos and Ahmos, and the New Kingdom of Egypt was born. During this era, the Egyptians extended their territory into Nubia. They gained timber, copper, gold, and wealth from taxes. They built a buffer zone to protect themselves against foreign attacks, and controlling Nubia spread the Egyptian language and culture from the support of local rulers.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia and Egypt DBQ

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Egyptian civilization began to develop near to the Nile River. The Nile River provided the population food and water because of its location in a fertile area in the middle of the desert. Farming began developing along the Nile River around 5000 B.C. Egyptian civilization consolidated about around 3150 B.C. with political unification of Upper and Lower Egypt under the first pharaoh, Narmer. Ancient Egyptians had a king but referred to him as a Pharaoh which was the most powerful person of Egypt. The pharaoh possessed the power of a god so he was considered the political and religious leader of the Egyptian people. The Pharaoh had two roles which were titled: “Lord of the Two Lands (Ruler of Upper and Lower Egypt)” & “High Priest of Every Temple (Gods on Earth)”. He was provided with own of land, collection of taxes, defense of Egypt, and also, creation of laws. As a God, he did rituals and built temples to honor gods. The huge pyramids built by the workers in Egypt where used as tombs to buried the kings (Pharaohs) with their possessions after death.…

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A strategic factor that began expansion is the Suez Canal. Disraeli bought the Egyptian ruler Ismail’s shareholding in the Suez Canal to secure control of this strategic waterway. During this time Britain was under intense political pressure from colonies within the empire. This is displayed with the Indian Mutiny in 1857, where the British wanted to secure this waterway to gain quick access to India and can therefore stop rebellion in India if necessary. Thus, securing the waterway between East and West Africa was crucial to deter encroaching rivals and secure important trade between continents. This is displayed in 1882, not only was 80% of Suez traffic British, but 13% of Britain’s entire trade passing through the Canal. Therefore Robinson and Gallagher suggest British military intervention into Egypt was due to ‘crucial changes that took place in Africa itself’ this signaled the end of Anglo-French financial control over Egypt that had once existed and ended in outright British occupation as British Military seized control over the country to ensure it’s trading…

    • 2331 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because Egypt was currently being protected by England they were involuntarily very involved in World War 1. Saad Zaghul, an Egyptian speaker, attempted to speak out against the British and fight for their independence. Zaghul was arrested in 1919, after his arrest riots and protest broke out all throughout Egypt. Through the boycotts and riots the British adviser, Milner, advised the England to remove the protectorate over Egypt. On February 28th, 1922, Britain declared limited Independence to…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sparked the resurgence of the Theban kings, due to a few hundred years of isolation and domination by the hands of the Hyksos, with there new found knowledge they were ready to take back Egypt.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The people held very special thing's on the Nile so the Nile was very important to Egypt. Because they…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As opposed to the film where Mr. Dryden sent Lawrence to assess the prospects of Prince Faisal in his revolt against the Turks, in reality the Arab Bureau and Lawrence supported the idea of an Arab Revolt as outlined in the McMahon Letter.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt and India government and society were going through difficulties which allowed the Europeans to control and take over their country. In the 1870s, Egypt was heavily in debt to European government and investors. Egypt sold their share of the canal to Britain in 1875. Eventually, Britain seized control over Egypt by using military forces. The Muslims Mughals ruled over India in the 1700s but lost power in the 1800s.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benjamin Disraeli, the British prime minister, saw buying the Suez Canal as a move for more political power rather than wealth. He may have seen it as such because the canal was a major choke point where other nations would passing through their territory thus giving the British full power over them while they were passing through the canal. THey would be able to impose a tax on ships or goods, allowing them to gain a lot of power politically and economically. He stated this in a speech to the House of Commons, a group of people in parliament who have input on major political decisions and he makes certain to mention political growth because giving more power to England would give more power to the House of Commons. This document fully supports the fact that political power over other countries was a definite motivator for expansion (doc…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paul, Honorable Ron of Texas. The End of Dollar Hegemony. Before the U.S. House of…

    • 2008 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays