As a harbinger of the United States failure in Vietnam, The Ugly American seems a terribly prophetic book. How could the warnings Lederer and Burdick sounded have gone unheeded? An examination of their book shows us precisely how, for in The Ugly American knowledgeable and skillful executors of American foreign policy (those who believe that "the things we do must be done in the real interest of the people whose friendship we need--not just in the interest of propaganda") are routinely replaced by those who know less, care less, and are eminently less qualified to serve those interests.…
United States foreign policy has always been characterized by a commitment to free trade, protection of American interests, and a concern for human rights. Our founding fathers, specifically George Washington, are responsible for much of the influence regarding foreign policy after their time period and up to the present day. Washington, in his Farewell Address, warned the country to stay out of permanent foreign entanglements and to stay neutral. The United States stayed faithful to Washington’s warnings for about 125 years. But, when the age of Imperialism hit, the country was forced to intervene to prevent other countries from rising up and becoming world powers. The atrocities of imperialism caused something that America will always regret; The First World War. After the war, the United States’ foreign policy changed from all out intervention to almost complete isolation, similar to what George Washington suggested. After the Second World War, American foreign policy back once again to intervention to try and make the world a better and more peaceful place. In comparison, each foreign policy have nearly no similarities, but a wealth of differences.…
DeConde, A., Burns, R. D., Logevall, F., & Ketz, L. B. (Eds.). (2002). Encyclopedia of American foreign policy (2nd ed.) (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Scribner 's.O’Malley, M. (1999)…
Thesis: The duty to protect and intervene in other counties affairs, militarily if necessary, to protect freedom, liberty and to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other atrocities is a doctrine to which the United States of America should hold fast to under all circumstances. Throughout American history, the government has struggled to define the fundamental purpose of U.S foreign policy: whether or not the US should intervene internationally to promote freedom and preserve democracy or to maintain national sovereignty. The international community and the obligation that it holds to preserve peace is a responsibility not to be taken lightly. The commitment to uphold freedom and liberty as stated by our very own Pledge of Allegiance should…
Since George H.W. Bush (41) took office in 1989, the United States has intervened in several high-risk situations such as the Gulf War, military deployment in Iraq, and the ongoing War in Afghanistan resulting in thousands of deaths of American soldiers. This is not okay because these soldiers are sons, daughters, brothers, and sisters, of fellow American citizens. Although the President can involve the United States’ military in any situation with the permission of Congress, he should not so if the opposition is a threat. The United States should not be the world’s policeman because foreign affairs require a substantial amount of resources that the U.S. should not let go; more so the United States should focus resources to being a global caregiver.…
It is imperative to understand the differences in ideology when studying the concepts of United States foreign policy towards Latin America. Realistic goals and strategies must be created in order to reshape United States policy towards Latin America. In regards to Smith, the aspect of realism helps people understand how the world operates and how to establish they viable framework of policy (Smith, 2013 p.334). As of now, there are two versions of realism. The first version is conservative realism. What is conservative realism? According to Smith, these are the five basic premises. One, the international system is anarchical. Two, sovereign…
America, a nation built upon the values of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,' has been referred to as the most powerful country in the world. While some people praise the U.S. for this great triumph, others resent it. And despite this obvious victory, many of America's leaders and policymakers suffer from an inferiority complex,' often feeling the need to act in ways that make the U.S. seem more superior. The actions exerted by America are reminiscent of a very outdated practice, called imperialism. This term has recently brought upon many arguments concerning the United States as an empire, particularly in the character and logic of U.S. domination that is at issue. America should not assert its economic, military, and cultural…
The goal of any nation has and the means it uses to pursue them are influenced by its traditions, core values, ideology, and advantages and limitations imposed by its geographical locations, size, and wealth relative to other nations. Here, American foreign policy terms include Physical Security, Physical Security of neighbors and allies, Economic security, and Extending our sphere of influence.…
The United States acquired many nations during the Age of Imperialism, which led to very invasive foreign policy in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Imperialism caused the US to have a paternalistic attitude, and a craving to expand- which shaped their selfish policy. The United States derived an overbearing feeling of paternalism from imperialism that bled on to their foreign policy during the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The US felt that they were a superior nation and that they had a duty to better underdeveloped nations. They saw themselves as the police of the west and wanted to protect the peace, “Chronic wrongdoing or any impotence which results in the general loosening of the ties of civilized society […]…
Walter Lafeber, The American Age, U.S Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad, W.W. Norton and Company, New York, 1989, p.327…
Even though soldiers are heroes and countless people feel superior to minorities, black people and women should be treated with respect since black people and women have been treated as lower class citizens and American soldiers have been treated as heroes when the soldiers are scared to be fighting. American Idealism forms the way something should be and how it is perceived. However, the idealism of American thought is not always correct. An individual should strive to come up separate opinions and thoughts on what is right and not conform to popular belief. In the past, there were preconceived perceptions of the war, on the treatment of blacks and women. Americans are taught that the country possesses a right to fight whomever and by going…
This unchallenged faith in American exceptionalism makes it harder for Americans to understand why others are less enthusiastic about U.S. dominance, often alarmed by U.S. policies, and frequently irritated by what they see as U.S. hypocrisy, whether the subject is possession of nuclear weapons, conformity with international law, or America’s tendency to condemn the conduct of others while ignoring its own failings. Ironically, U.S. foreign policy would probably be more effective if Americans were less convinced of their own unique virtues and less eager to proclaim…
In his Farewell Address, George Washington advised the nation against foreign affairs. It is plainly obvious that America did not heed Washington’s warning, as the onslaught of international world wars, among other things, forces the United States to interfere. America often plays the part of the “big brother” when it comes to national conflicts. The U.S. is revered by other countries, recognized as a powerful ally and a devastating enemy. Some historians and moral philosophers claim that it is America’s democratic duty to abandon the policy of isolationism and secure the liberty of the U.S. by fighting when necessary.…
has promoted, to the rest of the world. Therefore, American exceptionalism requires U.S. foreign policy to be altruistic and righteous. Although exceptionalism is not exclusive to the U.S., American exceptionalism stands out due to its nature as national identity. American exceptionalism has inherited among American elite and mass public from the beginning of its history, and therefore has strongly affected U.S. foreign policy. Indeed, the U.S. has been exceptional because American public has believed in American exceptionalism, and expressed their opinion through various means. Because public opinion matters, accordingly, administrations have intentionally promoted American exceptionalism to gain the public support. This utilization of American exceptionalism has led a serious problem of American exceptionalism: double standards in foreign policy. Under the name of American exceptionalism, U.S. military interventions have been overly justified as a noble mission to combat the evil for the entire world. American exceptionalism conceals the true intention aiming to maximise U.S. national interests, as well as allows disrespect towards foreign cultures and traditions as inevitable process to complete the mission. In addition to military-related issues, American exceptionalism has caused unacceptable double standards, most prominently in human rights issues. It allows the U.S. to create its own standards specifically favourable to itself and allies, while claiming to promote international standards of human rights, as if those two standards are always identical. American exceptionalism has been utilized to legitimate U.S. foreign policy. As a result, American exceptionalism has attracted criticism by academics and non-academics both from inside and…
The year of 2014 has proven to be that no president gets a free pass when it comes to difficult international decisions. Over the last term and a half, the Obama administration really has been picking up the disruptions of the Middle East right where Bush left them while simultaneously being dealt with more issues of diplomacy. The occurrences involving Ukraine and Syria have, in opinion, shown the current administrations true colors. It is the prime example of the realism ideology and the contrast between “hard” and “soft” power. In both situations, Obama has shown great reluctance in putting to use the American military. Although tens of thousands Syrians have been murdered and Ukraine has been under direct attack from Russia, present administration has moved from the “hard power” that killed Osama bin Laden and essentially ended the war in Iraq to a potential isolationist. However, as some could argue, like Stephan M. Walt, “foreign policy is not philanthropy.” Unless allies have direct benefits for the United States, perhaps the nation has no business jumping to the rescue (Walt). In other words, America is once again bringing focus back to the home front and has the potential of taking a more realist approach to foreign policy than ever before. If the nation truly does not want to look out for the interest of fellow democratic states simply because it…