Preview

What Is Socrates A Tyrant

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
792 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Socrates A Tyrant
In Book II of Plato’s Republic, Glaucon argues that a person who can act unjustly and get away with it has no reason to live a just life. In fact, he would be happier if he didn’t. To support his claim, Glaucon told the story of the ring of Gyges. This story is about a servant who discovered a ring that gave him the power of invisibility. With this power, he seduced the queen, and then, with her help, was eventually able to kill the king. Furthermore, because no one knew it was him, he was able to claim the kingdom as his. Glaucon said that if the same ring were given to a just and unjust person they would act in the same way out of the natural desire to do and be better. However, later on in Book IX, Socrates describes the life of a tyrant …show more content…
He says that the tyrannical man is like the tyrannical city in that both are ruled by lawless appetites and the desire for honor and power. Socrates describes these appetites as, “the ones that wake up when we are asleep, whenever the rest of the soul—the rational, gentle, and ruling element—slumbers” (571c3-5) and rids the soul of temperance. So, then just as a tyrannical city is enslaved to the tyrant, the tyrant is enslaved to the most wicked part of himself. And because the tyrannical city is least able to do what it wishes, so is then the tyrannical soul. The character, Dorian Gray, from the 1945 film The Picture of Dorian Gray can also be described in this …show more content…
The first similarity is that neither of these characters were born unjust. They only became this way under the influence of someone or something else. Socrates describes this as something like a winged drone that implants a powerful passion inside anyone it stings. He goes on to say that this causes the person to be ruled by his own lawless desires and draws him towards shameless and criminal things. And, to protect himself from the consequences of this, he instills a fear in the people of his city. But, just like Dorian Gray, he never has any true friends. Because of these experiences, he will be full of disorder and regret, and as Dorian did, he will beg for forgiveness only when it is too late. Once the appetitive element of the soul has taken over and destroyed the rational element, there is no way to turn back; subsequently leading Dorian to a willful

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will show that Glaucon and Thrasymachus' positions on justice are entirely different. We argue that Thrasymachus despite his slippage and confusion between a traditional and immoralist definition of justice, is really intending to illustrate a political system ruled by a rational-minded and exploitative tyrant. On the other hand Glaucon clearly presents justice as a necessary evil originating out of a social contract constructed by the weak of society. He then challenges Socrates to prove to him that the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, many stories are used as allusions and metaphors to describe the issues being discussed. One of these stories is in chapter two and is known as the “Ring of Gyges.” This story has many similarities to the Ring of Power in The Lord of The Rings saga, which also grants the ability to turn invisible. In this essay, I will compare and contrast the “Ring of Gyges” and the events surrounding the Ring of Power in The Lord of the Rings trilogy.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ring Of Gyes Summary

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Using the invisibility power of the ring, Gyes seduces the queen and, with her help, murders the king and takes control of the kingdom. Glaucon uses the Ring of Gyes story to claim that no one is willingly a…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The similarity between the two lie in their belief to fight an unjust law through persuasion and to do so in a peaceful way. He also claims “In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are alive, negotiation, self-purification and direct action,” and Socrates does participate in the several of these actions to further his point. They both agree that in cases of unjust law, they should fight it (despite that one was willing to go further than another) but still respect the laws in place. King knew that disobeying the law would only bring chaos and reflect badly on the idea of change they wanted and to get the desired results he needed to act in a way that would properly show what he desired.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glaucon supports his view of justice with the story of Gyges and the golden ring. According to the story, Gyges, a simple farmer living in service to the king, came across a golden ring which possessed the ability to turn whoever was wearing it invisible. After learning of his newly acquired power, Gyges seduces the queen, kills the king, and takes the kingdom for himself. This…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his philosophy, Plato places a large emphasis on the importance of the idea of justice. This emphasis can be seen especially in his work ‘The Republic’ where, through his main character Socrates, he attempts to define the nature of justice and to justify this definition. One of the methods used by Socrates to strengthen or rather explain his argument on justice is through his famous city-soul analogy, where a comparison between a just city and a just soul/individual is made. Through this analogy, Socrates attempts to explain the nature of justice, how it is the virtue of the soul and is therefore intrinsically valuable to the individual, but it becomes apparent in the analysis and evaluation of the analogy that there may have been several purposes behind it. Inconsistencies within the analogy itself also raise questions to the validity in Plato’s definition and justification of justice.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After this, Socrates goes on to show that there are four types of regimes, listed in the order of most just to least just: aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy and tyranny. Then he goes on to say how each develops from the other, and why each is just and/or unjust. Similarly, the men from each era represent the amount of justice in their souls. This in turn proves that the just man is happier than the unjust man.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “ring of Gyges” refers to a story told by Glaucon found in Plato’s Republic. In Book II, Glaucon uses this story to challenge Socrates’ idea that people are just by nature and argues that many people would rather prefer to act unjust over just. The story he tells talks about a man who stumbles upon a magical ring that makes him invisible whenever he wants, thus giving him the power to do whatever he desired, while not getting caught and still maintaining a good reputation. He ends up seducing the queen, murdering the king, and eventually taking over the kingdom with the help of the magical ring, with no direct consequences he would have faced if he were not invisible. The point of Glaucon’s story is to demonstrate how if anybody, no matter how just or unjust they truly are, had the opportunity to do what they wanted, whether it would harm others or not, and get away with it, they would do it, and if they did not, they would be seen as a fool for not taking up the opportunity.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He must do this regardless of the opinion of the majority or possible consequences for himself; he must act only in accordance to the opinion of the few wise, knowledgeable men who understand what is justice, and the laws of the State. Unfortunately, in all of the dialogues the author of this essay has read5, Socrates never clearly explains what ‘the laws’ really are — they remain a sort of abstraction, a divine essence of justice. However, this does not invalidate our definition of a champion of…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the just man is always more intelligent than the unjust man. Socrates' argues that the one who is the more intelligent human being between the just and unjust man. The second is concern with the idea that the unjust man gains strength from acting unjustly. According to Socrates, this idea is really the unjust man's down…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Socrates Unjust

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What is the difference between a. and a. Both Socrates and Glaucon ultimately agree that it is better to be actually just and seemingly unjust than it is to be actually unjust but seemingly just. Their reasons for holding this position are because people just have control over themselves. They are able to maintain dominion over their desires, to avoid self indulgence in evil desires, and to choose good things. This is something the unjust person loses no matter how just he may seem.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glaucon believes the idea of justice comes from man experiencing both sides of evil acts and deciding to no longer experience either end. Secondly, Glaucon cases implemented laws force man to behave justly, against their own will. He portrays a story where a man possess a ring, the Ring of Gyges, making him invisible to others. With this power, the man seduces the Queen of his town, manipulating her into overthrowing the King so he is at rule, furthermore proving man will do what is advantageous to him when there are no consequences to hold one accountable. Glaucon’s concluding argument is people living unjust lives exist in more content than those who live justly.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Socrates Failure

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The virtue in individuals does not always bring prosperity to the state on the whole. Not everyone is sensitive to the good of the others. Socrates' republic is, in this sense, utopic. Socrates states, "Anyone who intends to practise his craft well never does or orders but his best for himself " (Plato, 23). This belief does not match the modern experience nor does it match the experience of a Greek citizen in Ancient Greece. In reverse, Thrasymachus believes that justice is a means for the strong to exercise advantage. In a sense Thrasymachus associates the strenght of a citizen with his authority and position in the society. He famously states, "Justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger" (Plato, 14). Justice is a tool for the established order to preserve itself. The strong citizen with a sizeable authority makes use of justice in a manner to assert his private interests. Under the shadow of justice, he can easily practise injustice and impose it as justice to the others. Thats why the strong is in a position to employ justice and injustice at their own interest. For instance, since a ruler makes laws in a position to twist justice for his own benefit. Therefore, his prior concern is to preserve and enhance his own authority. In order to do that, he ignores the welfare of his subjects. He does not act always within a moral…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays