The pros of lifetime of judges in the Supreme Court are that they do not have to worry about the political pressure or to contribute with money for any political campaign. “The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is to assure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch”. (laws, n.d.). In addition, there are judges in the Supreme Court that worries about make a fair system…
| Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…
Write a 350- to 700-word paper in which you compare the three models of the criminal justice process. Include your opinion on which model you think best describes today’s criminal justice system and your rationale for that choice.…
Having our Supreme Court Justice serving on the bench for life can have pros and cons. Although, most of our fellows americans seem to have more drawbacks about our Supreme Court of Justice life tenure position. With this in mind, let me first mention the pros…
When Justices are appointed, they take the oath to make decisions that are fair and according to the Constitution. The decisions justices take every day affect the lives of Americans in many ways. The Justices are given the heavy responsibility to interpret the law and Constitution. However, many times Justices get confused about the original intent of the law, and therefore interpret it different from what the legislators wrote back then. Since the legislators of the Constitution are not alive today, Justices have to try their best to make decisions according to the law.…
This means that the Justices may hold office until they die, reign, or are impeached. Impeachment is the only exception to the phrase good behavior. As it states in Article II that Supreme Court justices can be removed from office by impeachment, just as the president and vice president can. Only one Justice, Samuel Chase, was ever impeached and that was in 1804.…
The defendant was a terrible person and it may be understandable to many people why the officer got into the back seat and gave him what he truly deserved. However, these actions were totally against the law and there is no exception for an officer of the law to hold himself above the law. Unfortunately in this case you do not really have too many options and none of them are and easy fix. The brotherhood factor; you are part of a organizational police force that regards its self as a family of sort, and everyone knows you not suppose to turn your back on family or give them up. After seeing the uncontrolled brutality of your partner you have to be having thoughts that may include if you really know exactly the person that you are working with. However the brotherhood factor brings you back to the reality of things; that you are both cops and on the same team, unfortunately for right or wrong. So you go into the court room and lie for your fellow officer (Pleas/Options).…
The Supreme Court justices are appointed in the same manner as all Federal Constitutional Judges, by the President with the advise of the U.S. Senate for life terms without a reduction in pay. This is to assure judicial independence. The impact would be enormous if the Supreme Court justices had to be elected to office by the people. If they were elected by the people they would not make every decision fairly, they would not be in office for life and they wouldn't be as well respected.…
Just like the presidential cabinet, all justices are nominated by the president and approved by the Senate. When the president appoints a person to become a member of the judicial branch, they are in that position for the rest of their life unless…
They are appointed by the president and gets to serve for life. People would want to chose who there own supreme court justices are. In addition, they can serve there whole life for unlimited years meaning they potitionaly could become lazy in there duties and corrupt. On the other hand, when they are appointed judges it goes thought congress to make sure the person is politicly right for the job. If they do not do a fair job with good behavior they can be impeached and hold accountable for there actions. Finally they will have more wisdom and experience with being a judge because they are running for life. The judicial branch lays a major part of our national government, security and rights of our…
During their tenure, a Justice will be able to continue learning and understanding the law, so that in every situation they know what is constitutional and unconstitutional. Confucius once said, “Study the past if you would define the future.” The decisions of Supreme Court Justices have led to many new laws. However, those decisions are made by justices who have been doing that for a while. These Supreme Court Justices understand our past, the decisions, laws, and consequences, and know how to act upon that because of their prolonged tenure as justices. Under no circumstance does anybody just stop learning, so Justices will be ripe with knowledge until their time is done, they choose to step down, or are impeached. Therefore, Supreme Court Justices life tenure helps them understand and master their role in the Supreme…
The Supreme Court of the United States serves as the judicial body that interprets the implementation of the U.S. Constitution. Over the years, this Court as a whole has made some landmark decisions, forever altering the direction of our country. However, the Court is a sum of its parts, in which each individual justice has a say in the outcome of each case. Today, the Court is made up of one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices. While there is no set standard on how the justices are to cast their vote, there are several common constitutional interpretation styles justices tend to utilize.…
Many justices are approaching an age at which they can retire, and the next justices elected to the supreme court will heavily influence the U.S. for years, possibly decades. The next justices will most likely be elected according to the next president's views. However, the president should elect justice who will be best for the country as a whole, not just according to their own views. The next president must be able to think about the entire nation when electing justices. They must show leadership by listening to others, and not just…
The Supreme Court is a very powerful part of the government. The Supreme Court is the highest federal court in the United States. This court has a higher power than any other court in the nation meaning that they alone decide the meaning of the constitution. The Supreme Court has nine justices that decide the constitutionality of cases that petition them. The Supreme Court derives their power through “judicial review” Judicial review is the act of declaring of a law or act of another branch as constitutional or not.…
The theory that I found the most interesting in Justice 251 this semester is the trait theories. The glossary in our textbook describes trait theory as “The view that criminality is a product of abnormal biological and/or psychological traits” (Siegel 564). I found this theory to be very interesting because it talks about all of these factors that could increase the likelihood of someone becoming a criminal. When looking at this this theory it suggests that maybe the driving factor in someone making them do criminal activities is something simple like a hormonal imbalance. This could be very useful to know because there might be a cure whatever it is that is making them commit crimes.…