What Is The Difference Between Charlie And Buster Keaton

Charlie Chaplin made audiences laugh, but he also made us feel. Buster Keaton may not have drawn as much laughter or emotion as Chaplin, but his comedy was at least as creative. Throughout the 1920s Keaton took great risks both physically and financially. Harold Lloyd lacked the training and natural comedy of Chaplin and Keaton, yet he could make us laugh as hard as we did when watching Chaplin, and could draw as much sympathy and suspense as Keaton. These were the great pioneers of cinema.

Today, Chaplin is probably the most iconic of the three figures, there is no reason why other men should not be working in the same manner, along the same broad lines as he follows. Chaplin has brought improvised comedy to the screen, the commedia dell'
Harold Lloyd we remember today not for his “Lonesome Luke” character which was a Charlie Chaplin knock off and with what he started his career, but with his “Glasses Character.” Like Keaton, he faced impossible odds to achieve his goals, but unlike Keaton his face was very expressive. His comedy was physical like Chaplin’s, a combination of raw slapstick and animated emotion. His objectives on screen were like those of Keaton’s characters, with physical stunts equally impressive and often more suspenseful. Of course, no one could equal Keaton’s use of special effects, as evident nowhere more so than in The General that was a big budget film for its day in which he collapses an entire bridge with a train on it. Lloyd’s character was more of an everyday man. Lloyd’s glasses, like Chaplin’s ill-fitted suit, firmly established his character. For Lloyd, the glasses make him seem common and they also challenge the general perception that men with glasses are more
is perhaps etched in their consciousness even if they have never seen the film. And it is probably one of the most iconic shots in film history at that, paid homage only a few years ago in Martin Scorsese’s visually stunning 2011 film, Hugo, an adaptation of Brian Selznick’s beautifully illustrated children’s book and tribute to early cinema, The Invention of Hugo Cabret.

Chaplin is considered a pioneer and one of the most influential figures of the early twentieth century. He is often credited as one of the medium's first artists. He was the first to popularise feature-length comedy and to slow down the pace of action, adding pathos and subtlety to it. Although his work is mostly classified as slapstick, Chaplin's drama A Woman of Paris (1923) was a major influence on Ernst Lubitsch's film The Marriage Circle (1924) and thus played a part in the development of "sophisticated